The chemical spill in West Virginia’s Elk River has attracted a chorus of complaints about the lack of regulation and accountability before and after the spill, but Sen. Jay Rockefeller sees a bigger problem.
The West Virginia Democrat said that Freedom Industries’ chemical spill and its bankruptcy filing just a week later are encouraging the state’s “Scotch-Irish” sense of fatalism, during a hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Water and Wildlife Subcommittee.
There is “an Appalachian myth,” Rockefeller said, that the federal government will not look out for the state, and that companies like Freedom Industries cannot be held accountable.
“The idea that God has it in his plan to make sure that industry is going to make life safe for you — not true,” he said.
Rockefeller said West Virginia residents have told him they want to leave the state because they have no faith that their water will be clean, either in the short or long term.
That belief, Rockefeller said, was exacerbated when Freedom Industries filed for bankruptcy, which he and several senators said could be a means of avoiding liability for the spill.
“They will cut corners, and they will get away with it,” Rockefeller said.
Much of the hearing was focused on strengthening the Toxic Substances Control Act, which requires testing and reporting on chemical-storage facilities. The Freedom Industries facility had not been tested since 2002. Rockefeller cosponsored a Senate bill with fellow West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin, as well as Barbara Boxer and Dick Durbin, which would amend TSCA’s system of assessing chemical risks.
Rockefeller was adamant that federal legislation is necessary to prevent similar chemical spills in the future, rather than leaving the issue to state regulators. That’s partly for practical reasons relating to environmental regulations, he said, but also to put a dent in West Virginians’ passive views.
“You don’t accept the world as it is,” Rockefeller said. “You accept it as it should be, and then you make it conform to that posture.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.