That Obamacare ‘Bailout’ Saves Taxpayers $8 Billion

The Congressional Budget Office expects insurance companies to pay in more than they take out.

Marco Rubio listens to Senator Max Baucus as he testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for his confirmation to become the next US ambassdor to China on Capitol Hill in Washington,DC on January 28, 2014.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sam Baker
Feb. 4, 2014, 8:24 a.m.

The Obama­care pro­gram Re­pub­lic­ans have cri­ti­cized as a “bail­out for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies” will ac­tu­ally save the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment about $8 bil­lion, the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice said Tues­day.

The pro­gram in ques­tion, known as risk cor­ridors, was de­signed to sta­bil­ize in­sur­ance premi­ums if the pool of people who sign up for cov­er­age is dif­fer­ent than ex­pec­ted.

Many Re­pub­lic­ans, led by Sen. Marco Ru­bio, want to re­peal the pro­gram — per­haps as part of an agree­ment to raise the debt ceil­ing. But the pro­gram will prob­ably save the gov­ern­ment money, CBO said in its re­vised budget fig­ures.

Here’s how risk cor­ridors work: When in­surers’ real-life costs are high­er than what they ex­pec­ted when they set their premi­ums, the gov­ern­ment ab­sorbs some of the losses. When in­surers’ costs are lower than ex­pec­ted, they pay in­to the pro­gram.

In ef­fect, the gov­ern­ment shares in un­ex­pec­ted costs as well as un­ex­pec­ted sav­ings. And the sav­ings will likely be big­ger, CBO said.

In­surers will prob­ably re­ceive about $8 bil­lion in risk-cor­ridor pay­ments, CBO said, but will pay in roughly $16 bil­lion — for a net sav­ings to the gov­ern­ment of about $8 bil­lion.

CBO Dir­ect­or Doug El­men­d­orf said that doesn’t mean re­peal­ing the risk cor­ridors would add $8 bil­lion to the de­fi­cit — in­surers change their be­ha­vi­or be­cause they’re count­ing on these pay­ments, he noted, so re­peal would need to be scored on its own.

Still, today’s es­tim­ate cer­tainly makes it easi­er for vul­ner­able Demo­crats to res­ist any polit­ic­al pres­sure to re­peal risk cor­ridors. It might also re­flect some un­der­ly­ing op­tim­ism about Obama­care en­roll­ment.

Every­one knows over­all en­roll­ment will be some­what lower than ex­pec­ted — CBO says about 1 mil­lion lower — be­cause of the botched rol­lout of Health­ That un­cer­tainty has stoked fears that in­surers will end up with sick­er, more ex­pens­ive pa­tients than they planned, caus­ing them to raise premi­ums next year.

But by pro­ject­ing that risk cor­ridors would save the gov­ern­ment money, CBO is say­ing it ex­pects in­surers’ costs, over­all, to be lower than ex­pec­ted — not high­er.

“Des­pite the tech­nic­al prob­lems that have im­peded en­roll­ment in ex­changes “¦ CBO ex­pects that premi­um bids will still ex­ceed costs,” the budget of­fice said.

Risk cor­ridors wouldn’t save the gov­ern­ment money if in­sur­ance mar­kets na­tion­wide were flooded with sick, ex­pens­ive pa­tients. In a worst-case scen­ario, in­surers would have to pay out far more claims than they an­ti­cip­ated when they set their premi­ums, trig­ger­ing risk-cor­ridor pay­ments from the gov­ern­ment and then premi­um in­creases next year.

By pre­dict­ing sav­ings from the risk-cor­ridor pro­gram, CBO isn’t ne­ces­sar­ily pre­dict­ing that Obama­care’s ex­changes will be health­i­er than ex­pec­ted; there are oth­er reas­ons for spend­ing to be low. But the pro­jec­tion is a sign that CBO doesn’t ex­pect the kind of ex­cep­tion­ally bad risk pool that could threaten the ex­changes’ ba­sic solvency.

El­men­d­orf noted that there is con­sid­er­able un­cer­tainty in CBO’s ana­lys­is of how the health care law will af­fect in­surers and said the $8 bil­lion fig­ure was in the middle of a wide range of pos­sib­il­it­ies. It could save the gov­ern­ment more, he said, or it could end up cost­ing tax­pay­ers.

Catherine Hollander contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
McCabe Authorized Criminal Probe Of Sessions One Year Before Firing
1 hours ago

"Nearly a year before Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired senior FBI official Andrew McCabe for what Sessions called a 'lack of candor,'" McCabe launched a federal criminal investigation into whether Sessions withheld information from Congress regarding his contact with Russian operatives. "Democratic lawmakers have repeatedly accused Sessions of misleading them" during his testimony, "and called on federal authorities to investigate." When Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation, "several top Republican and Democratic lawmakers were informed of the probe during a closed-door briefing with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and McCabe."

Senate Passes Bill Combating Sex Trafficking Online
1 hours ago

The Senate passed the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act, or SESTA, by a vote of 97-2. The bill now heads to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it into law. SESTA lifts federal immunity for internet platforms involved in sex trafficking, "a move that prosecutors, victims and anti-trafficking activists are heralding as an essential step in cracking down on the crime." Opponents of SESTA argue had argued that lifting the immunity could open websites up to lawsuits based on user-generated content, which could lead to a crackdown on free speech.

How Trade Associations Come Down on the Tariffs
2 hours ago

The Economist

Mark Zuckerberg Responds To Cambridge Analytica Scandal
2 hours ago

In a lengthy Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg responded to reports that Cambridge Analytica had accessed the personal data of 50 million users, and kept the data after being told by the social media company to delete it. "I started Facebook," wrote Zuckerberg, "and at the end of the day I'm responsible for what happens on our platform ... While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn't change what happened in the past." On Monday, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, called for “Mr. Zuckerberg and other CEOs” to testify "about social media manipulation in the 2016 election."

White House Backs Omnibus Spending Bill
3 hours ago

"The White House is backing a $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill despite opposition from some House conservatives ... 'The President and the leaders discussed their support for the bill, which includes more funds to rebuild the military, such as the largest pay raise for our troops in a decade, more than 100 miles of new construction for the border wall and other key domestic priorities, like combatting the opioid crisis and rebuilding our nation’s infrastructure,' White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement." The details of the bill are expected to be released later today.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.