Anti-NSA Crusader Outraises Susan Collins in Fourth Quarter of 2013

Does “the Elizabeth Warren of civil liberties” pose a serious threat to Maine’s moderate incumbent?

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill February 1, 2011 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Feb. 5, 2014, midnight

Is gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance an is­sue to win on in the midterm elec­tions?

At least one up­start Demo­crat­ic chal­lenger in Maine vy­ing for Re­pub­lic­an Susan Collins’s Sen­ate seat thinks so — and she’s got the early fun­drais­ing clout to sug­gest she might be onto something.

Shenna Bel­lows out­raised Collins in the last quarter of 2013, rak­ing in $331,454, com­pared with the $314,921 raised by Collins dur­ing the same peri­od, ac­cord­ing to fil­ings made with the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion. The mar­gin is slight, but it’s note­worthy in part for Bel­lows’s vo­cal stance against the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance pro­grams, which she de­rides as un­con­sti­tu­tion­al.

Fans of Collins’s unique brand of mod­er­ate con­ser­vat­ism should hold off on pan­ick­ing just yet, though. The 17-year in­cum­bent has more than $3 mil­lion in cash on hand and has eas­ily won reelec­tion each cycle since first ear­ing her seat it in 1996. The race didn’t crack Na­tion­al Journ­al Hot­line’s rank­ings of the 15 most likely Sen­ate seats to flip in 2014, and few ex­pect Maine to sud­denly be­come a top battle­ground state.

But if Bel­lows keeps haul­ing in im­press­ive dona­tions — more than 80 per­cent of her con­tri­bu­tions amoun­ted to $100 or less — her can­did­acy could, at a min­im­um, pull the cent­rist Collins fur­ther left dur­ing the cam­paign sea­son, and demon­strate that gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance is an is­sue that res­on­ates with voters.

“That’s how I win,” Bel­lows said. “I win by build­ing an un­usu­al co­ali­tion of pro­gress­ives, liber­tari­ans, and in­de­pend­ents who are en­er­gized by my po­s­i­tion to re­store con­sti­tu­tion­al freedoms and eco­nom­ic fair­ness.”

Collins, who joined the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee last year, has pre­vi­ously de­fen­ded the NSA’s sur­veil­lance pro­grams for hav­ing “thwarted dozens and dozens of ter­ror plots both here and over­seas.” But she has ad­mit­ted that the spy­ing rev­el­a­tions and oth­er is­sues have led to a “loss of faith in gov­ern­ment” that is “in some ways, de­served.” 

Bel­lows, mean­while, is noth­ing short of a pro­gress­ive’s dream can­did­ate, and not just be­cause of her NSA views. Her plat­form also in­cludes marijuana leg­al­iz­a­tion, stronger en­vir­on­ment­al pro­tec­tions, Wall Street re­form, and a firm plank in fa­vor of abor­tion rights. She served as the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Maine’s Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on for the past eight years, a ten­ure that found her cham­pi­on­ing lib­er­al causes such as same-sex mar­riage and same-day re­gis­tra­tion. She also worked in D.C. for the ACLU, a job where she said she was “hired spe­cific­ally to work on rais­ing aware­ness against the Pat­ri­ot Act,” the post-9/11 bill that gran­ted the gov­ern­ment much of its present-day sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity.

“I op­pose the con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­gram, and I would re­peal the Pat­ri­ot Act,” Bel­lows said. She ad­ded that the Free­dom Act, a bill be­ing pushed by Sen. Patrick Leahy and Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner that would lim­it the NSA’s sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity, is “ab­so­lutely a step in the right dir­ec­tion to re­store checks and bal­ances.”

Bel­lows would un­doubtedly have a lot in com­mon with Sens. Ron Wyden of Ore­gon and Mark Ud­all of Col­or­ado, both Demo­crats who have ag­gress­ively pur­sued NSA re­form meas­ures on grounds that the agency’s sur­veil­lance ap­par­at­us poses a ser­i­ous threat to Amer­ic­ans’ pri­vacy and civil liber­ties.

Her polit­ics have led the Pro­gress­ive Change Cam­paign Com­mit­tee to dub her the “Eliza­beth War­ren of civil liber­ties,” a monik­er she finds flat­ter­ing. The group en­dorsed Bel­lows Wed­nes­day and blas­ted out a fun­drais­ing no­tice to its net­work ask­ing for con­tri­bu­tions of $3.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×