Obama Climate Plan Revives Talk of a Carbon Tax

Sweeping power-plant regulations would enable states to use pollution trading, fees to cut heat-trapping emissions.

President Barack Obama speaks about climate change during an event in the East Room at the White House August 3, 2015 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Aug. 3, 2015, 3:55 p.m.

The big na­tion­al cap-and-trade plan died on Cap­it­ol Hill five years ago, and it re­mains very much dead. A car­bon tax — the per­en­ni­al aca­dem­ic solu­tion for curb­ing green­house-gas emis­sions — had even less trac­tion in Con­gress and lives on mostly in think tanks.

But Pres­id­ent Obama’s En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency cli­mate reg­u­la­tions for power plants, un­veiled on Monday, may give those policies new life at the state level.

In a change from the draft plan, the fi­nal EPA rule now ex­pli­citly says states can use “fees” (i.e., taxes) as a tool for meet­ing their emis­sions-cut­ting re­quire­ments. That’s on page 899 of the massive 1,560-page rule. Plans that states craft to com­ply with the man­date, the rule states, “could ac­com­mod­ate im­pos­i­tion by a state of a fee for CO2 emis­sions from af­fected [elec­tric gen­er­at­ing units], an ap­proach sug­ges­ted by a num­ber of com­menters.”

That lan­guage is a rather brief bless­ing but enough to ex­cite the ad-hoc, Left-Right mix of en­vir­on­ment­al­ists, eco­nom­ists, and a few con­ser­vat­ive car­bon-tax ad­voc­ates who have long been swim­ming up­stream at the na­tion­al and state level.

Dav­id Book­bind­er, a former high-level Si­erra Club law­yer, says car­bon-tax back­ers will im­me­di­ately be­gin fresh dis­cus­sions about how they can con­vince states to get on board. “We have all been wait­ing for this,” said Book­bind­er, now an ad­junct schol­ar at a think tank called the Niskan­en Cen­ter. “The calls will prob­ably start to­night or to­mor­row.”

“The next step is to en­sure that states know about this op­tion and con­sider it ser­i­ously,” said Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion eco­nom­ist Ad­ele Mor­ris, who has long ar­gued that EPA should let states use taxes to meet the power-plant man­dates.

Mor­ris said she’s “de­lighted” by the new rule lan­guage.

“This is great news for states that want to pur­sue a cost-ef­fect­ive, eas­ily-ad­min­istered, mar­ket-based ap­proach,” Mor­ris said. “States can not only com­ply with the new rule, they can also solve fisc­al short­falls and ac­com­plish pro-growth tax re­form.”

Car­bon taxes don’t guar­an­tee emis­sions cuts, however, so it’s among the state meas­ures that would re­quire a “back­stop” of “fed­er­ally en­force­able emis­sion stand­ards” in case they don’t bring about the man­dated re­duc­tions.

While the rule very briefly blesses car­bon taxes as an op­tion, ex­perts pre­dict that an­oth­er form of put­ting a price on car­bon emis­sions — the trad­ing of pol­lu­tion cred­its or al­low­ances — is more likely to gain steam un­der EPA’s rule. The Clean Power Plan provides de­tailed dis­cus­sions of how states can use emis­sions-trad­ing sys­tems to com­ply with the rules, which are aimed at cut­ting power-plant emis­sions 32 per­cent over­all by 2030.

The plan also de­scribes how states can make their power plants “trad­ing ready,” which al­lows them to par­ti­cip­ate in trad­ing with plants in oth­er states even in the ab­sence of form­al in­ter­state pacts.

EPA’s pro­mo­tion­al ma­ter­i­als on the rule call trad­ing “cost-ef­fect­ive,” and the agency is vow­ing to sup­port states’ ef­forts on track­ing emis­sions and emis­sions cred­its in or­der to help im­ple­ment multistate trad­ing.

“Clearly EPA is do­ing what they can to make it easy for states to opt for emis­sions trad­ing,” said Kev­in Kennedy, a cli­mate ex­pert with the World Re­sources In­sti­tute.

The rule could sub­stan­tially ex­pand use of mar­ket-based trad­ing sys­tems bey­ond what’s in place in Cali­for­nia and the Re­gion­al Green­house Gas Ini­ti­at­ive, a con­sor­ti­um of North­east­ern states with a re­gion­al cap-and-trade sys­tem for power plants.

“I think we can ex­pect de­vel­op­ment of more mar­kets around the coun­try,” said An­thony Paul of the en­vir­on­ment­al think tank Re­sources For the Fu­ture, who pre­dicts that “many more” states will ad­opt car­bon-pri­cing policies. “We could see rather large mar­kets that in­volve many states un­der the Clean Power Plan.”

To be sure, Re­pub­lic­ans turned against cap-and-trade years ago, even though it was once favored among many con­ser­vat­ives as a way to cut pol­lu­tion us­ing mar­kets to steer the most cost-ef­fect­ive and ef­fi­cient emis­sions curbs.

But now that EPA has fi­nal­ized the rules, Paul pre­dicts that trad­ing could find fa­vor in states with GOP lead­ers. “The ad­vant­ages of mar­ket-based reg­u­la­tions are many, and I think even in Re­pub­lic­an states it will be hard to ig­nore those ad­vant­ages,” he said.

Book­bind­er notes that Clean Air Act rules are the only tool avail­able to cut power-plant emis­sions, but says the am­bi­tious but com­plex rules will bring years of leg­al chal­lenges.

He ar­gues that a fed­er­al, “rev­en­ue-neut­ral” car­bon tax is a bet­ter ap­proach, and be­lieves that if some states ad­opt taxes to com­ply with Obama’s rules, it could make Con­gress more open to the idea.

“It’s the most eco­nom­ic­ally ef­fi­cient way of re­du­cing emis­sions. … If we can get states to do this, it will give Con­gress some com­fort that it can be done in a bi­par­tis­an man­ner,” Book­bind­er said, ar­guing that there are open­ings for car­bon taxes in states with di­vided gov­ern­ment, such as Illinois.

Mor­ris, for her part, says tax back­ers need to make their case to states.

“When the dust settles, I think states will come to see this as a very vi­able op­tion. For ad­voc­ates of tax­ing car­bon, EPA’s fi­nal rule is a threshold achieve­ment,” she said. “The next step is to en­sure that states know about this op­tion and con­sider it ser­i­ously.”

What We're Following See More »
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
14 hours ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT
Baltimore Removes Confederate Monuments
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Confederate statues in Baltimore were removed from their bases overnight, as crews using heavy machinery loaded them onto flat bed trucks and hauled them away, an end to more than a year of indecision surrounding what to do with the memorials. The action comes after Baltimore City Council approved a plan Monday night to remove four statues linked to the Confederacy from public spaces in the city."

Source:
“TOLERATES BIGOTRY”
AFL-CIO Head Trumka Quits Council
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login