The Behind-the-Scenes Battle for the Future of the Internet

The noise over net neutrality is coming from Congress, but the real action is elsewhere.

National Journal
Feb. 6, 2014, 6:49 a.m.

Demo­crats can’t do any­thing about a court rul­ing that struck down their cher­ished net-neut­ral­ity rules, but they know someone who can.

The now-van­quished “Open In­ter­net” rules were the province of the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion, and that’s where Demo­crats are pin­ning their hopes to re­store them.

At stake, they say, is no less than the fu­ture of the In­ter­net. The FCC’s rules re­quired In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders to treat all web­sites equally. Demo­crats fear that without the rules, In­ter­net pro­viders could soon start slow­ing down ac­cess to web­sites like Net­flix and Google un­less the sites pay for spe­cial In­ter­net “fast lanes.” The In­ter­net pro­viders could even block ac­cess to par­tic­u­lar sites al­to­geth­er.

In Con­gress, top House and Sen­ate Demo­crats launched le­gis­la­tion Monday aimed at restor­ing the rules, at least while the FCC crafts new ones. But that’s all for show: The bill is dead on ar­rival in the House, where Re­pub­lic­ans have long des­pised the FCC’s net-neut­ral­ity rules — vir­tu­ally every one of them voted to re­peal the rules in 2011. Per the GOP, the reg­u­la­tions are an out­dated, un­ne­ces­sary, and bur­den­some in­tru­sion in­to the busi­ness de­cisions of In­ter­net pro­viders such as Com­cast and Ve­r­i­zon.

In­stead, the Demo­crats’ bill is aimed at mak­ing their voice heard at the site of the real fight for the fu­ture of the In­ter­net: the FCC. The rep­res­ent­at­ives are beg­ging com­mis­sion Chair­man Tom Wheel­er to act uni­lat­er­ally to re­store the rules.

“It is con­gres­sion­al pres­sure,” a Demo­crat­ic aide said, adding that the le­gis­la­tion shows that Demo­crats on the Hill will stand be­hind Wheel­er if he moves to re­in­state the rules. “Many seni­or mem­bers be­lieve that the FCC needs to take ac­tion — that simply ac­cept­ing the court’s de­cision is not sat­is­fact­ory.”

And Wheel­er has all the votes he needs to do so; he’s an Obama ap­pointee and at the head of an ideo­lo­gic­al ma­jor­ity on the five-mem­ber com­mis­sion. The ques­tion now is wheth­er he’ll take ac­tion, and how.

He has a few op­tions for try­ing to sal­vage the reg­u­la­tions, which were first pro­mul­gated by his pre­de­cessor, Ju­li­us Gen­achow­ski, in 2010. Wheel­er could ap­peal the de­cision, but with a un­an­im­ous rul­ing against the FCC from a three-judge pan­el of the Court of Ap­peals for the D.C. Cir­cuit, the agency’s chances don’t look good.

The most dra­mat­ic op­tion would be to re­clas­si­fy broad­band In­ter­net as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice,” which the FCC has broad au­thor­ity to reg­u­late. Re­clas­si­fic­a­tion would put the rules on firmer leg­al ground but would prompt an im­me­di­ate back­lash from con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, who would view the move as a gov­ern­ment takeover of the In­ter­net.

The FCC has sweep­ing powers over phone com­pan­ies, down to the prices they charge and the areas they serve. Im­pos­ing a sim­il­ar reg­u­lat­ory re­gime on the In­ter­net would strangle its growth, Re­pub­lic­ans fear. The FCC could re­clas­si­fy broad­band while also im­pos­ing cer­tain lim­its on its own abil­ity to reg­u­late, but that re­straint may do little to ap­pease the agency’s crit­ics.

An­oth­er op­tion would be to try to re­work the rules un­der the ex­ist­ing au­thor­ity.

Al­though the court struck down the spe­cif­ic rules in the case, it did up­hold the FCC’s over­all au­thor­ity to reg­u­late broad­band pro­viders. Wheel­er could start a new rule­mak­ing pro­cess or just an­nounce the prin­ciples he in­tends to pro­tect un­der the agency’s cur­rent powers. But re­work­ing the rules would al­most cer­tainly mean wa­ter­ing them down.

Har­old Feld, the seni­or vice pres­id­ent for con­sumer ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Know­ledge, ex­pressed doubt that the FCC will be able to en­act ef­fect­ive reg­u­la­tions without re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band as a tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.

“[FCC of­fi­cials] may be think­ing that they can pick off enough of the most ob­vi­ous forms of ab­use that it would be ad­equate,” he said. “I don’t think it would be.”

Feld noted that be­cause Demo­crats con­trol the White House and the Sen­ate, Re­pub­lic­ans can’t pass le­gis­la­tion to undo an FCC de­cision to re­clas­si­fy broad­band. “People get paid to do their job,” Feld said. “And one of the things that every­body said about Wheel­er that was go­ing to be so great was that he was go­ing to have the spine and will­ing­ness to do his job, and he wasn’t go­ing to chick­en out just be­cause people make a lot of noise.”

The Demo­crat­ic Hill aide said law­makers are in­ten­tion­ally try­ing to leave Wheel­er’s op­tions open and not dic­tate what ac­tion he should take. But the aide said most Demo­crats be­lieve the FCC needs to have some kind of net-neut­ral­ity rules on the books.

“The ac­tion right now is at the FCC. The ball is in their court,” the aide said.

Wheel­er has re­peatedly stated that he is com­mit­ted to pro­tect­ing a free and open In­ter­net. Speak­ing after the FCC’s meet­ing last week, he said he is still look­ing at “all of the tools in the tool­box” and that the agency will an­nounce a “plan and ra­tionale shortly” for deal­ing with net neut­ral­ity.

What We're Following See More »
BREAKING WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AFTER TRUMP INSULTED THE SENATOR
McCain Family to Endorse Biden
39 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"The late Sen. John McCain's family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden's White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party's crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned. In an extraordinary snub to Trump, who derided McCain's Vietnam War service and mocked him even after his death last August at age 81, the McCain family is preparing to break with the Republican Party. McCain represented the party in Congress for 35 years and was chosen as its presidential nominee in 2008, losing to Barack Obama."

Source:
LEGAL BATTLE BETWEEN THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS LOOMS
IRS Resists Giving Congress Trump's Tax Returns
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin left little doubt Tuesday that the administration will reject a congressional request for President Donald Trump's tax returns by a self-imposed May 6 target for a "final decision," setting the stage for a legal battle that will test the limits of congressional oversight."

Source:
CALLS CONGRESS "VERY PARTISAN"
Trump Opposes White House Aides Giving Congressional Testimony
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump on Tuesday said he is opposed to current and former White House aides providing testimony to congressional panels in the wake of the special counsel report, intensifying a power struggle between his administration and House Democrats. In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump said that complying with congressional requests was unnecessary after the White House cooperated with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference and the president’s own conduct in office."

Source:
GAG RULE WOULD HAVE KEPT CLINICS FROM REFERRING WOMEN TO ABORTION PROVIDERS
Judge Blocks Trump Abortion Rule
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane late Tuesday said he’ll grant a preliminary injunction against new federal restrictions that bar taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring patients to abortion providers, calling the rule a 'ham-fisted approach to public health policy.' Oregon is one of 20 states and the District of Columbia that challenged the Trump administration’s changes to the Title X family planning program in U.S. District Court in Oregon, along with Planned Parenthood affiliates and the American Medical Association."

Source:
WANTS IT BY MAY 1
Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
5 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login