Why Elizabeth Warren Isn’t the Most Liberal Senator

She broke with her party over a key element of Obamacare, and opposed the estate tax. Plus, she has many very liberal colleagues.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks during a briefing on a Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule October 30, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Peter Bell
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Peter Bell
Feb. 6, 2014, 7:13 a.m.

Ten years ago, Na­tion­al Journ­als vote rat­ings showed John Kerry to be the Sen­ate’s most lib­er­al mem­ber. Some called the rat­ing un­fair, but con­ser­vat­ives were glee­ful that someone else had so labeled the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee for pres­id­ent. Pres­id­ent Bush even men­tioned Kerry’s rat­ing dur­ing their second 2004 pres­id­en­tial de­bate, de­scrib­ing it as “the award he won from the Na­tion­al Journ­al.”

This year, the vote rat­ings of an­oth­er Mas­sachu­setts Demo­crat are eye-catch­ing, but for the op­pos­ite reas­on. Eliza­beth War­ren, the new­est lib­er­al icon, is not the most lib­er­al mem­ber of the Sen­ate, ac­cord­ing to this year’s Na­tion­al Journ­al vote rat­ings. War­ren’s com­pos­ite lib­er­al score of 73.2 places her as the 31st-most-lib­er­al sen­at­or. How could that be?

For starters, she broke with Pres­id­ent Obama on a very sig­ni­fic­ant piece of le­gis­la­tion, vot­ing to re­peal Obama­care’s med­ic­al-device tax — a core ele­ment to the fund­ing of the Af­ford­able Care Act. Many man­u­fac­tur­ers are based in Mas­sachu­setts, so this is an in­stance of her vot­ing her con­stitu­ency over her party. She didn’t stop there, join­ing with many Re­pub­lic­ans to “re­peal or re­duce the es­tate tax” if done in a fisc­ally re­spons­ible way. War­ren even irked con­sumer ad­voc­ates by op­pos­ing a meas­ure that would have al­lowed states to man­date la­beling of foods that con­tain ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied in­gredi­ents. Those dif­fer­ences gave her a lib­er­al per­cent­ile score of 75 on eco­nom­ic policy.

An­oth­er reas­on that War­ren didn’t stand out is that many of her less­er-known col­leagues are also very lib­er­al — part of the very po­lar­iz­a­tion that we write about in this week’s Na­tion­al Journ­al cov­er story. By tak­ing one small vote against her lead­er­ship, her rank­ing drops con­sid­er­ably be­cause so many Sen­ate Demo­crats have held a lib­er­al line.

On for­eign policy, War­ren re­ceived a lib­er­al per­cent­ile score of 54. In that area, War­ren took the con­ser­vat­ive po­s­i­tion on just one vote, vot­ing with al­most every Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an against an amend­ment to lim­it the leg­al rights of Guantanamo de­tain­ees brought to the United States (vote num­ber 238). How could War­ren get such a mod­er­ate score when she voted with Re­pub­lic­ans just once? An­swer: When Sen­at­ors vote in lock­step, small dif­fer­ences in vot­ing re­cords can have a large im­pact on per­cent­ile scores. And with nearly 30 sen­at­ors rack­ing up per­fect lib­er­al vot­ing re­cords on for­eign policy, the highest lib­er­al per­cent­ile score any of them re­ceived was a 71.

On so­cial is­sues, War­ren lived up to her repu­ta­tion, ty­ing with 26 oth­er Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors as the most lib­er­al. War­ren and well-known lib­er­als such as Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Tammy Bald­win, D-Wis., all re­ceived a score of 73 — the most lib­er­al score any sen­at­or got in that cat­egory.

Josh Kraush­aar con­trib­uted

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login