According to a newly released study from the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, hard drug users who use both heroin and cocaine have a mortality rate that is 14.3 times higher than the population at large.
For users of cocaine alone, that rate is 5.1 times higher.
The results come from a survey of more than 20,000 drug users in Spain who were admitted into treatment programs over the span of 10 years (1997-2007). The researchers followed up on the participants until 2008, accumulating “a total of 132,824 person-years of follow-up,” they wrote — a truly massive amount of data.
The authors suggest this is perhaps the largest sample of drug users ever studied.
Here are some of their grim findings.
- “Heroin use was also the strongest independent predictor of a higher mortality risk among all cocaine users.”
- “Other signiï¬cant risk factors were daily cocaine use and having been previously admitted to drug treatment.”
- “Not having regular employment and lifetime drug injection were important independent mortality risk factors both among [cocaine-only users] and [cocaine and heroin users].”
Their findings also suggest that cocaine use is slightly more dangerous for women than men, but they are not sure why.
Though the numbers are stark, the researchers do admit that their sample was limited to people who have entered rehab, which could mean the participants in their sample had a more aggressive drug habit than what would be represented in a truly random sample. And also, direct causation can’t be inferred from a survey. “This excess mortality cannot automatically be attributed to cocaine or heroin use, because participants and the general population may differ in other factors that were not assessed, such as mental disorders, personality factors, [and] social conditions,” they write.
But still, even if it serves as a high boundary of the risks of using drugs, it’s a boundary you don’t want to approach. After all, who would would want to even double their chance of dying, let alone increasing it 14-fold.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."