Veterans Pensions Bill Advances Into Political War Zone

WASHINGTON - APRIL 25: U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AK) talks with the news media after a meeting with U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales at his office on Capitol Hill April 25, 2007 in Washington, DC. Gonzales made no comments to the news media after the meeting but Pryor said that he told the attorney general that it would be best if he resigned as the top law enforcement official. 
National Journal
Feb. 10, 2014, 5:14 p.m.

Cav­ing to over­whelm­ing pres­sure from vet­er­ans’ lob­by­ing, the Sen­ate took steps Monday to­ward un­wind­ing a con­tro­ver­sial cut in vet­er­ans pen­sions that has made law­makers from both polit­ic­al parties vul­ner­able to at­tacks.

By a vote of 94-0, the Sen­ate ap­proved a mo­tion to pro­ceed to a bill from em­battled Arkan­sas Demo­crat Mark Pry­or that would re­store a $6 bil­lion cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment for mil­it­ary re­tir­ees. The con­tro­ver­sial cut was in­cluded in last year’s bi­par­tis­an budget deal and has haunted law­makers ever since.

The Pry­or bill would not off­set the budget hole it would cre­ate, but Re­pub­lic­ans who ini­tially planned to fili­buster cal­cu­lated it would be too dan­ger­ous to vote against al­low­ing a de­bate on re­peal­ing the cuts. Their anxi­ety was re­flec­ted in the fact that no one voted against mov­ing the bill for­ward.

In­stead, the strategy is to try to pres­sure Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id in­to al­low­ing them to of­fer amend­ments to pay for the le­gis­la­tion. (The meth­od has proved fu­tile for the minor­ity in the past, but Re­pub­lic­ans are bank­ing on it provid­ing them polit­ic­al cov­er.)

Many Re­pub­lic­ans have ral­lied around a pro­pos­al from New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an Kelly Ayotte that would off­set the $6 bil­lion cost by clos­ing the child tax cred­it to un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants.

Demo­crats have ranged from not want­ing to off­set the le­gis­la­tion, to look­ing to close off­shore tax loop­holes as pro­posed by New Hamp­shire Demo­crat Jeanne Shaheen, to a broad­er be­ne­fits bill from Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bernie Sanders that would rely on sav­ings from the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan.

But neither party has offered a pay-for that is amen­able to the oth­er side, leav­ing the res­ol­u­tion far from clear.

The House GOP, mean­while, huddled late Monday and emerged of­fer­ing a debt-ceil­ing deal that would in­clude re­vers­ing the con­tro­ver­sial COLA cuts. The pro­pos­al would off­set the cost by ex­tend­ing man­dat­ory se­quest­ra­tion for an ad­di­tion­al year. Re­id has ar­gued that the debt-ceil­ing in­crease must be clean, but it is un­clear where Demo­crats would come out on a pack­age that re­versed the COLA cuts.

Al­though it is not yet clear how Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans can come to­geth­er on a plan to undo the cuts, sev­er­al sources on and off Cap­it­ol Hill track­ing the is­sue say they ex­pect law­makers to even­tu­ally get it done.

“The fix is in,” said Steve Bell, a seni­or dir­ect­or of eco­nom­ic policy with the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter who op­poses re­vers­ing the cuts, de­scrib­ing the ac­tion as a “little tiny feath­ery touch.”

“Who wants to face a bar­rage of paid ads this Novem­ber with the [Vet­er­ans of For­eign Wars] and the Amer­ic­an Le­gion and Dis­abled Amer­ic­an Vet­er­ans and all those folks out there say­ing, “˜We have men and wo­men in harm’s way and dy­ing and it’s a slap in the face to our vet­er­ans’?” he asked rhet­or­ic­ally.

The cuts do not kick in un­til late 2015, and some law­makers such as Sen. John Mc­Cain have ar­gued that Con­gress could eas­ily un­wind them in the massive $550 bil­lion an­nu­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, where there would be ample de­fense dol­lars to off­set the cost.

But vet­er­ans groups are pound­ing law­makers hard on the is­sue, ar­guing that mil­it­ary mem­bers need peace of mind now that their pen­sions will be pro­tec­ted.

Vet­er­ans rep­res­ent­at­ives are vent­ing frus­tra­tion that law­makers are “play­ing polit­ics” by com­ing up with pay-fors they know are ob­jec­tion­able to the op­pos­ite party in an ef­fort to score polit­ic­al points rather than reach­ing across the aisle to settle the is­sue.

“Vets are cer­tainly used to be­ing polit­ic­al pawns, but they are not very happy about it.”¦ We are see­ing that hap­pen­ing on this now,” said Alex Nich­olson, the le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or for the Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan Vet­er­ans of Amer­ica.

Nich­olson said the mad­den­ing part is that Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are talk­ing only to them­selves.

“It’s be­come ap­par­ent to us that there is not a lot of talk­ing back and forth dir­ectly among of­fices in try­ing to work out a solu­tion that is bi­par­tis­an and polit­ic­ally vi­able,” he said. “That’s been one of the most frus­trat­ing things in this whole epis­ode. It seems that Re­pub­lic­ans are work­ing in a Re­pub­lic­an silo and the Demo­crats are work­ing in a Demo­crat silo and every­one is try­ing to get the vets groups on board with their pro­vi­sion. But at the end of the day “¦ if you don’t have the sup­port of the lead­er­ship in the Sen­ate, then it’s not go­ing to go to the floor. There’s been a lot of rhet­or­ic and not a lot of stra­tegic think­ing about what is ac­tu­ally real­ist­ic about what is go­ing to get 60 votes and put on the floor.”

What We're Following See More »
FOR IMPROPER SPENDING, INFLUENCE
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
14 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Source:
WOULD HAVE CROSSED NATIONAL FORESTS
Federal Judges Nix Proposed Atlantic Pipeline
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a rare rebuke to energy companies in the Trump era, "a panel of federal judges has rejected permits for the Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline to cross two national forests and the Appalachian trail in Virginia, finding that the national Forest Service 'abdicated its responsibility' and kowtowed to private industry in approving the project. The harshly worded, 60-page decision issued Thursday by three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is part of a string of legal setbacks for the 600-mile pipeline. The $7 billion project, being built by a consortium of companies led by Dominion Energy, is planned to carry natural gas from West Virginia, through Virginia and into North Carolina."

Source:
PINS KHASHOGGI KILLING ON MBS
Senate Moves to End Support for Saudi War
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
REP. POLIQUIN HAD CHALLENGED THE LAW
Federal Judge Upholds Ranked-Choice Voting in Maine
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge on Thursday rejected Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin’s constitutional claims against ranked-choice voting and denied the incumbent’s request for a new election against Democratic Congressman-elect Jared Golden. U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker ruled that, contrary to the arguments of Poliquin’s legal team, the U.S. Constitution does not require that whichever congressional candidates receives the most votes—or 'a plurality'—be declared the winner. Instead, Walker ruled the Constitution grants states broad discretion to run elections."

Source:
SAUDI ARABIA, ISRAEL, AND THE UAE
Mueller Probing Middle East Countries' Influence Campaigns
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Officials working under Special Counsel Robert Mueller are investigating Middle Eastern countries' attempts to influence American politics, and are set to release the findings in early 2019. "Various witnesses affiliated with the Trump campaign have been questioned about their conversations with deeply connected individuals from the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Israel ... Topics in those meetings ranged from the use of social-media manipulation to help install Trump in the White House to the overthrow of the regime in Iran." Investigators are also probing meetings organized by Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, and Joel Zamel, "a self-styled Mark Zuckerberg of the national-security world with deep ties to Israeli intelligence."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login