The Scientific Case for Wearing Jeans to Work

Vindication for the hipster: A nonconformist image projects competence and high status, research finds.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Feb. 13, 2014, midnight

We mock them, the hip­sters. We mock them in their cof­fee shops, as they sip hand-poured brews, while they wear cutoff over­alls and bright mi­cro-plaid-prin­ted shirts.

We poke fun at their iron­ic love of ob­sol­ete fads, like vinyl, mus­taches, fixed-gear bikes. We mock them be­cause they don’t con­form. But per­haps, deep un­der­neath all that mock­ing, we ac­tu­ally re­spect the hip­ster.

A re­search pa­per from the Har­vard Busi­ness School finds that stand­ing out a little can “lead to in­fer­ence of en­hanced status and com­pet­ence in the eyes of oth­ers.” In oth­er words, hip­ster non­con­form­ity can work in the work­place.

It’s a re­sponse to what re­search­ers call “the red sneak­er ef­fect.” Mark Zuck­er­berg is an ob­vi­ous ex­ample here. He runs the world’s most pop­u­lar so­cial-net­work­ing site and has made bil­lions, but he of­ten wears hood­ies. When Mi­crosoft an­nounced its new CEO last week, the com­pany pub­lished pho­tos of him look­ing real cas­u­al wear­ing a T-shirt and thick-rimmed glasses. Too cool (or more sub­lim­in­ally, too power­ful) to care.

Silvia Bellezza, the lead au­thor on the pa­per, no­ticed a sim­il­ar trend in her aca­dem­ic circles. “At aca­dem­ic con­fer­ences, the big-shot pro­fess­ors would be the ones dressed very cas­u­ally,” she says. “It star­ted as a bit of a joke — we were mak­ing fun of this fact. But as a mat­ter of fact, the people who en­joy high status in so­ci­ety will tend to dis­respect rules more than people who are at the bot­tom of it.”

What she wanted to know is if, in turn, oth­ers come to per­ceive slight non­con­form­it­ies in dress as a mark­er of high status, wheth­er it’s war­ran­ted or not.

And they do. In one study, par­ti­cipants awar­ded pro­fess­ors who were un­shaven and wore T-shirts while teach­ing as hav­ing high­er aca­dem­ic status. In an­oth­er, a sample of re­tail as­sist­ants in Mil­an rated shop­pers at high-end boutiques who dressed in cas­u­al clothes as be­ing more likely to be a celebrity than those who dressed el­eg­antly.

“What we find is that these in­fer­ences of status and per­form­ance are driv­en by an at­tri­bu­tion of autonomy,” Bellezza ex­plains, “the idea that the per­son is able to dic­tate her own laws. She has her own rules.”

But like the laws of grav­ity and time, the laws of non­con­form­ity are re­l­at­ive. Here are the con­di­tions in which the non­con­form­ity ef­fect is max­im­ized.

1. Those who value ori­gin­al­ity are more likely to rate oth­ers more highly for be­ing ori­gin­al. If your em­ploy­er val­ues uni­forms, you’re not go­ing to im­press him or her with a cre­at­ive twist.

2. The per­ceiv­er has to be fa­mil­i­ar with the con­text of the situ­ation. You have to know the norm to spot a de­vi­ation from it.

3. The hip­ster­i­ness has to ap­pear in­ten­tion­al. No one wants to be per­ceived as be­ing ob­li­vi­ous to fash­ion trends. In an­oth­er study, par­ti­cipants were asked to ima­gine a per­son wear­ing a red bow tie to a black-tie event. In the con­di­tion in which the par­ti­cipants were told he didn’t mean to wear the red tie, the ef­fect was at­ten­u­ated.

And 4. Bellezza the­or­izes that the ef­fect would be can­celed out in a group of non­con­form­ists. “If you were to go in a cre­at­ive agency in which be­ing a non­con­form­ist is the norm, then be­ing non­con­form­ing would mean wear­ing a tie,” she says. (Ed­it­or’s note: Na­tion­al Journ­al col­leagues, take note of this.

The re­search­ers were study­ing slight de­vi­ations from the norm. Like de­cid­ing not to wear a tie in a set­ting in which it’s ex­pec­ted, but still wear­ing a buttoned-down shirt and pants. Or wear­ing a very loud col­or. “Go­ing to class bare­foot, wear­ing a tie around your head, we are not look­ing at that,” she says. So there may be a threshold after which “cool and ori­gin­al” turns in­to just look­ing like a fool.

And there are still risks in break­ing the mold. A 2008 pa­per in the Journ­al of Per­son­al­ity and So­cial Psy­cho­logy con­cluded, “In­di­vidu­als who formed over­in­flated per­cep­tions of their status were liked less by oth­ers and rated as more lonely and ali­en­ated.” The au­thors said this is due in part to be­ing per­ceived as dis­rupt­ive to the group.

Strik­ing a bal­ance, it seems, is the crux of the suc­cess­ful hip­ster: slightly ori­gin­al, but not en­tirely grat­ing.

What We're Following See More »
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
AT ISSUE: VENEZUELA SANCTIONS
Deal Struck to Confirm Ambassador to Mexico
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The United States is finally about to get an ambassador to Mexico. Senate Republicans who have been negotiating a way to confirm Roberta Jacobson as the nation’s top diplomat to Mexico have reached the contours of an agreement that would allow Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)—Jacobson’s chief obstacle—to secure renewed sanctions against Venezuela in exchange for lifting his objections."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Much Is Cleveland Paying for ‘Protest Insurance’ for the GOP Convention?
3 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Ten million dollars, plus another $1.5 million for the broker who will "develop and obtain" the policy. The concern: mass protests could lead to mass arrests, which could then lead to civil rights claims against the city.

Source:
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×