Report: U.K. Plans for New Submarines Require More Debate

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 11, 2014, 7:05 a.m.

A new in­de­pend­ent re­port con­tends there is a press­ing need for well in­formed U.K. de­bate over plans for mod­ern­iz­ing that na­tion’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

The Nuc­le­ar Edu­ca­tion Trust re­port, re­leased on Tues­day, raises sev­er­al factors re­lated to any de­cision on wheth­er to pro­cure four new Suc­cessor-class bal­list­ic mis­sile sub­mar­ines, in­clud­ing the cost of mod­ern­iz­ing the coun­try’s nuc­le­ar de­terrent and its po­ten­tial for be­ing in­volved in a cata­stroph­ic mis­hap or con­trib­ut­ing to pro­lif­er­a­tion, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­ports.

“Bri­tain’s nuc­le­ar weapons should be sub­ject to the same cost-ef­fect­ive­ness test and pub­lic scru­tiny that all pub­lic ex­pendit­ure has to be sub­jec­ted to,” states the re­port.

Un­der ex­ist­ing De­fense Min­istry plans, today’s four Van­guard-class sub­mar­ines — armed with Tri­dent nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles — are due to be re­tired in the 2020s. The so-called “like-for-like” plan to re­place them with Suc­cessor ves­sels is pro­jec­ted to cost more than $30 bil­lion in de­vel­op­ment­al, pur­chase and op­er­at­ing costs.

The Con­ser­vat­ive Party — the seni­or part­ner in the U.K. gov­ern­ing co­ali­tion — has said Bri­tain would not make a “fi­nal gate” de­cision on wheth­er to pro­ceed with the like-for-like plan un­til after the next gen­er­al elec­tions in 2015.

That has not stopped Con­ser­vat­ives from ap­prov­ing tens of mil­lions of dol­lars in new sub­mar­ine-re­lated con­tracts. The Lib­er­al Demo­crats — the ju­ni­or gov­ern­ing party — want to see only three new bal­list­ic-mis­sile sub­mar­ines built, which could res­ult in about $3 bil­lion in plan sav­ings. There also have been signs that the op­pos­i­tion Labor Party could be waver­ing in its sup­port for the like-for-like plan.

The Nuc­le­ar Edu­ca­tion Trust — a non­profit that pro­motes edu­ca­tion in arms-con­trol mat­ters — called for in­clud­ing the U.K. nuc­le­ar de­terrent in the coun­try’s next Stra­tegic De­fense and Se­cur­ity Re­view. In pro­du­cing its own as­sess­ment, the trust in­ter­viewed a num­ber of one­time armed ser­vices chiefs and former de­fense sec­ret­ar­ies.

A sep­ar­ate re­port by Sci­ent­ists for Glob­al Re­spons­ib­il­ity on Monday con­cluded the Brit­ish gov­ern­ment spends ap­prox­im­ately $530 mil­lion an­nu­ally on nuc­le­ar arms-re­lated re­search and de­vel­op­ment.

What We're Following See More »
HOSTAGE SITUATION
Multiple Deaths, Injuries from Van Attack in Barcelona
57 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
58 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“PUBLICITY SEEKING”
Trump Blasts Graham, Flake on Twitter
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

As part of a twitter rant on Thursday morning, President Trump singled out Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham for criticism. He said Flake is "WEAK on borders, crime and a non-factor in Senate. He's toxic!" Trump also named Flake's primary challenger, Kelli Ward. He said Graham's contention that Trump suggested a moral equivalence between the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville and the counter-protesters is a "disgusting lie."

Source:
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login