A new independent report contends there is a pressing need for well informed U.K. debate over plans for modernizing that nation’s nuclear arsenal.
The Nuclear Education Trust report, released on Tuesday, raises several factors related to any decision on whether to procure four new Successor-class ballistic missile submarines, including the cost of modernizing the country’s nuclear deterrent and its potential for being involved in a catastrophic mishap or contributing to proliferation, the London Guardian reports.
“Britain’s nuclear weapons should be subject to the same cost-effectiveness test and public scrutiny that all public expenditure has to be subjected to,” states the report.
Under existing Defense Ministry plans, today’s four Vanguard-class submarines — armed with Trident nuclear-tipped missiles — are due to be retired in the 2020s. The so-called “like-for-like” plan to replace them with Successor vessels is projected to cost more than $30 billion in developmental, purchase and operating costs.
The Conservative Party — the senior partner in the U.K. governing coalition — has said Britain would not make a “final gate” decision on whether to proceed with the like-for-like plan until after the next general elections in 2015.
That has not stopped Conservatives from approving tens of millions of dollars in new submarine-related contracts. The Liberal Democrats — the junior governing party — want to see only three new ballistic-missile submarines built, which could result in about $3 billion in plan savings. There also have been signs that the opposition Labor Party could be wavering in its support for the like-for-like plan.
The Nuclear Education Trust — a nonprofit that promotes education in arms-control matters — called for including the U.K. nuclear deterrent in the country’s next Strategic Defense and Security Review. In producing its own assessment, the trust interviewed a number of onetime armed services chiefs and former defense secretaries.
A separate report by Scientists for Global Responsibility on Monday concluded the British government spends approximately $530 million annually on nuclear arms-related research and development.
What We're Following See More »
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Wednesday that he doesn't yet know the formula towards gaining passage of an Obamacare replacement in the Senate. "I don't know how we get to 50 (votes) at the moment. But that's the goal," McConnell said. The House passed an Obamacare replacement bill which has been widely seen as dead on arrival in the Senate, and McConnell has put together a working group of Republican Senators working towards creating health care legislation which could gain the support of at least 50 Senators.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."