Extremists Pose ‘Very Real’ Risk to Syrian Chemical Arms: U.S. Intel Official

Members of the Syrian rebel group al-Nusra Front prayed last week as they held position in the village of Aziza, on the outskirts of Aleppo. A senior U.S. intelligence official on Tuesday underscored the risk of extremists obtaining weapons of mass destruction in Syria.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
Feb. 12, 2014, 3:19 a.m.

A seni­or U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cial on Tues­day warned of a “very real” risk of ex­trem­ist groups gain­ing con­trol of Syr­i­an chem­ic­al or bio­lo­gic­al weapons.

“The cur­rent in­stabil­ity in Syr­ia presents a per­fect op­por­tun­ity for al-Qaida and as­so­ci­ated groups to ac­quire these weapons [of mass de­struc­tion] or their com­pon­ents,” U.S. De­fense In­tel­li­gence Agency Dir­ect­or Lt. Gen. Mi­chael Flynn said in Tues­day testi­mony be­fore the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, cit­ing the ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions’ long­time stated in­terest in ac­quir­ing the most dan­ger­ous arms.

His re­marks stand in con­trast to some re­cent com­ments by U.S. dip­lo­mats who have played down the risk that ex­trem­ists might seize Syr­i­an chem­ic­al arms as they are trans­por­ted to a coastal city for in­ter­na­tion­al re­mov­al and de­struc­tion.

Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment has blamed delays in mov­ing these sens­it­ive war­fare ma­ter­i­als out of the coun­try on se­cur­ity con­cerns, amid as­ser­tions that the sens­it­ive con­voys already have come un­der rebel at­tack. Dam­as­cus last year agreed to U.S. and Rus­si­an de­mands that it sur­render its en­tire chem­ic­al ar­sen­al fol­low­ing a ma­jor sar­in gas at­tack that al­legedly killed more than 1,400 ci­vil­ians.

“While Syr­ia’s stock­piles are cur­rently un­der the con­trol of the re­gime, the move­ment of these weapons from their cur­rent loc­a­tions for dis­pos­al or oth­er reas­ons drastic­ally in­creases the risk of these weapons or their com­pon­ents fall­ing in­to the wrong hands,” Flynn said. “There is also the very real pos­sib­il­ity that ex­trem­ists in the Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion could over­run and ex­ploit chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al weapons stor­age fa­cil­it­ies be­fore all of these ma­ter­i­als are re­moved.”

Dam­as­cus this week said nearly all of most of its most deadly chem­ic­als would be moved out of Syr­ia by the end of the month — two months past a dead­line set by in­ter­na­tion­al au­thor­it­ies.

At the Tues­day hear­ing, U.S. Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence Dir­ect­or James Clap­per told the pan­el it was “hard to dis­cern” wheth­er the Syr­i­an delays were due to le­git­im­ate se­cur­ity con­cerns. In­stead, he in­dic­ated, the lag times could re­flect a scheme by Dam­as­cus aimed at length­en­ing the chem­ic­al dis­arm­a­ment pro­cess for “as long as pos­sible be­cause it … serves to im­pli­citly le­git­im­ize As­sad.”

U.S. Am­bas­sad­or to the United Na­tions Sam­antha Power in com­ments to re­port­ers last week seemed to min­im­ize Dam­as­cus’ ar­gu­ment that ex­trem­ist threats to chem­ic­als un­der trans­port jus­ti­fied the delays.

“We know the re­gime has the abil­ity to move these weapons and ma­ter­i­als be­cause they have moved them mul­tiple times over the course of this con­flict,” Power said. “It is time for the As­sad gov­ern­ment to stop its foot-drag­ging.”

On Tues­day, Clap­per also told the Sen­ate pan­el there are pro­jec­ted to be in ex­cess of 7,500 for­eign fight­ers hail­ing from about 50 coun­tries cur­rently in Syr­ia. “Among them are a small group of [Afgh­anistan-Pakistan] al-Qaida vet­er­ans who have as­pir­a­tions for ex­tern­al at­tacks in Europe, if not the [U.S.] home­land it­self,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×