A trio of lawmakers are furious that members of Congress are potentially subject to the National Security Agency’s bulk collection of phone records, and they’re convinced the Obama administration is still lying to them.
Republican Reps. Darrell Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner joined with Democrat Jerrold Nadler on an anti-NSA letter Wednesday. The cohort wrote to Deputy Attorney General James Cole asking him to clarify his recent testimony admitting that the government “probably” collects call information from phone lines in congressional offices. The letter also dismisses Cole’s explanation as “inaccurate.”
“In your testimony [before the House Judiciary Committee], you indicated that the administration would only look at call records from a member of Congress if it had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the number was related to terrorism,” the letter reads. “That is not accurate. The NSA looks at individual numbers when it has low level, particularized suspicion, but it looks at millions more with no suspicion of wrongdoing whatsoever, some of whom may well be members of Congress.”
The troika cites a recent decision by the federal District Court in D.C. that found the program to be “likely unconstitutional.” Most judges reviewing the program have found it to be legal.
The administration has repeatedly countered that while virtually all phone records are subject to its data sweeps — a technique it says is necessary to assemble the whole haystack in order to find the needle — it examines only records determined to be relevant to a terrorism investigation.
Obama announced last month the NSA would reduce from three to two the number of “hops,” or degrees of separation, from a terror suspect for which it could analyze phone data. But the lawmakers said they still want Cole to clarify his testimony and “fully disclose all of the ways in which the government conducts or may possibly conduct surveillance on members of Congress.”
Sensenbrenner, a Wisconsin Republican and onetime architect of the post-9/11 USA Patriot Act, is the chief sponsor of the Freedom Act, which seeks to strongly curtail the NSA’s collection of phone records. Issa — who hails from California and has been a continual thorn in President Obama’s side in his role as chairman of the House Oversight panel — and Nadler, a New York Democrat, are among the bill’s 130 cosponsors.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.
"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."