U.S. Military: Afghanistan Releasing 65 ‘Dangerous Insurgents’ Against Our Wishes

Some of the soon-to-be-freed prisoners have killed or wounded U.S. soldiers, the military says.

Army soldiers carry an injured soldier who was shot in the leg, through a poppy field on April 24, 2011 in the Arghandab River Valley, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan.
National Journal
Feb. 12, 2014, 8:52 a.m.

The U.S. mil­it­ary con­demned the Afghan gov­ern­ment for over­rid­ing its ob­jec­tions and mov­ing for­ward with plans to free 65 de­tain­ees it be­lieves are dan­ger­ous and pose a ser­i­ous threat to the lives of co­ali­tion and loc­al Afghan troops.

De­tain­ees from this group of 65, cur­rently be­ing held at an Afghan de­ten­tion fa­cil­ity in Par­wan, are ex­pec­ted to be re­leased Thursday, the U.S. mil­it­ary in Afgh­anistan said in a state­ment.

Some of these de­tain­ees, the mil­it­ary said, are dir­ectly linked to at­tacks that have killed or wounded U.S. or co­ali­tion per­son­nel, Afghan se­cur­ity per­son­nel, or loc­al ci­vil­ians, and are con­sidered quite dan­ger­ous. One is a sus­pec­ted Taliban ex­plos­ives ex­pert; an­oth­er is a com­mand­er from the Haqqani net­work who is ac­cused of plan­ning at­tacks. “It re­mains the po­s­i­tion of [the U.S. mil­it­ary] that vi­ol­ent crim­in­als who harm Afghans and threaten the peace and se­cur­ity of Afgh­anistan should face justice in the Afghan courts, where a fair and trans­par­ent tri­al would de­term­ine their guilt or in­no­cence,” the mil­it­ary’s state­ment said.

The U.S. mil­it­ary says it provided, on sev­er­al oc­ca­sions, ex­tens­ive in­form­a­tion and evid­ence on each de­tain­ee to Afgh­anistan’s re­view board — which has pre­vi­ously said there was not enough evid­ence against a total group of 88 de­tain­ees to con­tin­ue hold­ing them. In a sep­ar­ate state­ment Tues­day, the U.S. mil­it­ary said the im­pend­ing re­lease would vi­ol­ate agree­ments between the two coun­tries — and that the evid­ence against these de­tain­ees “was nev­er ser­i­ously con­sidered, in­clud­ing by the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al.” Free­ing these de­tain­ees, the mil­it­ary said, “is a ma­jor step back­ward for the rule of law in Afgh­anistan.”

The de­fi­ance of Wash­ing­ton on this is­sue is yet an­oth­er sign of ten­sions between the two coun­tries, since Afghan Pres­id­ent Ham­id Kar­zai backed away from sign­ing a se­cur­ity pact with the U.S. late last year that would clear the way to leave a con­tin­gent of U.S. troops in the coun­try past the 2014 dead­line for the con­clu­sion of com­bat op­er­a­tions.

Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence Dir­ect­or James Clap­per told the Sen­ate on Tues­day he does not be­lieve Kar­zai is not go­ing to sign that pact. In­stead, it ap­pears the U.S. is go­ing to wait for his suc­cessor to be elec­ted in the spring. The com­ments came as news broke that the U.S. mil­it­ary is re­vis­ing its plans to with­draw troops from Afgh­anistan un­til after Kar­zai leaves of­fice — a re­flec­tion of a need to be prag­mat­ic as hopes wane to fi­nal­ize an agree­ment.

What We're Following See More »
BY 180 DAYS
Trump Delays Tariffs on Japanese and European Cars
2 days ago
THE LATEST
WOULD PRIORITIZE SKILLS OVER FAMILY TIES
Trump Unveils New Immigration Proposal
3 days ago
THE LATEST
HE WILL SIT FOR AN INTERVIEW IN MID-JUNE
Trump Jr. Agrees to Testify in the Senate
5 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Donald Trump Jr. has struck a last minute deal to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee ... Trump Jr. will sit for an interview some time in mid-June for between two and four hours, with the scope limited to five or six topics pertaining to his communications with Russian officials. This will be the last time Trump Jr. has to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to the terms of the deal."

Source:
STOCKS, DOLLAR FALL IN RESPONSE
China Hits Back with Tariffs on $60B in U.S. Goods
6 days ago
THE LATEST
IN RETALIATION
China Raising Tariffs
6 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login