Intelligence officials and issue analysts report signs that Saudi Arabia wants to develop a capacity to enrich uranium, despite proliferation concerns.
Riyadh is understood to be worried that world powers will agree to allow Iran to maintain some limited uranium-enrichment capability in a potential lasting deal on its nuclear program. Saudi Arabia has an established interest in developing an atomic-energy program, but its concerns about Iran could be causing the Persian Gulf kingdom to consider a more expansive domestic nuclear capability, the Daily Beast reported on Friday.
Institute for Science and International Security President David Albright told the news website he had learned from an unidentified European intelligence agency of Saudi Arabia’s pursuit in recent years of the scientific and engineering expertise necessary to carry out activities in all parts of the nuclear fuel chain.
The full cycle for producing atomic fuel includes uranium enrichment and the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel — two processes that could be used to create both more fuel for civil energy needs and fissile material suitable for powering warheads.
Albright said Riyadh was employing technical experts capable of constructing the centrifuge cascades required to enrich uranium.
“They view the developments in Iran very negatively,” he said. “They have money, they can buy talent, they can buy training.”
“The Saudis are thinking through how do you create a deterrent through capability,” said Albright, a physicist and onetime weapon inspector for the International Atomic Energy Agency.
An anonymous Obama administration official told the Daily Beast, “The logical response of any of Iran’s neighbors to an agreement that severely restricted Iran’s program … is not to build up a proto-military capability in enrichment, it’s rather to go in the opposite direction.”
At the Munich Security Conference earlier this month, former Saudi intelligence chief Turki al-Faisal suggested that if Tehran retained a uranium-enrichment ability in a final nuclear deal, then Riyadh and other Arab governments could pursue enrichment programs of their own.
“I think we should insist on having equal rights for everybody, this is part of the [Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty] arrangement,” he said.
- 1 Only the Margin Seems in Doubt in the Presidential Race
- 2 Great Democratic Hopes Energize Quiet Faithful in Missouri
- 3 Smart Ideas: Ken Bone Revealed a Serious Policy Divide, and Elizabeth Warren Seeks a Co-Presidency
- 4 The Late-Breaking Democratic House Targets
- 5 Knight Tied to Sexual Harassment Claim Against Ex-Staffer
What We're Following See More »
It was announced on Friday that Gary Johnson and Jill Stein will participate in a candidate's forum, to be filmed live on Oct. 31 and air in two parts. The forum will air on PBS's Tavis Smiley. Additionally, there will be a 30 minute discussion available exclusively online with questions selected from social media.
The protest over the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline turned violent overnight as the police and National Guard sought to remove the protesters, surrounding them with assault vehicles and officers in riot gear. The law enforcement officers used pepper spray and fired bean bags for more than six hours. In response, the protesters "lit debris on fire and threw Molotov cocktails in retreat." One woman pulled out a gun and fired at officers, narrowly missing before being arrested. The protesters claim the pipeline would be constructed on land belonging to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
The House has scheduled leadership votes for Nov. 15, the day after members return from their election recess. "Since mid-September, members of the House Freedom Caucus have weighed whether they should ask leadership to push back the elections so they can see how House Speaker Paul Ryan performs at the end of the year," but leaders don't seem inclined to grant their request.