Why There Won’t Be a ‘Three Amigos’ Summit This Time Around

Obama will meet with his Mexican and Canadian counterparts, but don’t expect a lot of hugs.

National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
George E. Condon Jr.
Feb. 18, 2014, 12:26 a.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama flies to Mex­ico on Wed­nes­day to meet with his North Amer­ic­an coun­ter­parts, he’ll be re­viv­ing a con­tin­ent­al lead­ers’ meet­ing that George W. Bush en­vi­sioned as an an­nu­al event when he hos­ted the first one in 2005. That one went so well it was dubbed the “Three Ami­gos Sum­mit.” Then-Mex­ic­an Pres­id­ent Vi­cente Fox praised Bush, say­ing he had “mastered the tra­di­tion­al male hug of Mex­ic­an cul­ture, the ab­razo.”

But Obama is not really the hug­ging kind. And he, Mex­ic­an Pres­id­ent En­rique Peña Ni­eto, and Ca­na­dian Prime Min­is­ter Steph­en Harp­er are not really act­ing much like ami­gos these days. So don’t ex­pect a lot of ab­razos dur­ing Obama’s time in Tolu­ca, the cap­it­al of the state of Mex­ico, about 40 miles south­w­est of Mex­ico City. There are prob­lems among the lead­ers of the con­tin­ent’s three coun­tries.

Wash­ing­ton is dis­pleased that Peña Ni­eto blocked most of the Amer­ic­an se­cur­ity co­oper­a­tion after he took of­fice a little more than a year ago and is con­cerned about the con­tin­ued high levels of vi­ol­ent crime and kid­nap­pings in Mex­ico. Mex­ico City is dis­pleased that Obama has failed to push through im­mig­ra­tion re­form in the United States. And Ot­t­awa is dis­pleased that Obama has taken five years to make up his mind on its pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline in­to the United States with still no de­cision in sight. Fur­ther set­ting the at­mo­sphere for the one-day sum­mit, Mex­ico is dis­pleased with Ca­na­dian visa policy, and the two coun­tries cur­rently have what Duncan Wood, dir­ect­or of the Mex­ico In­sti­tute at the Wilson Cen­ter, calls “rather frosty re­la­tions.” There are, said Wood, “a num­ber of ten­sions which have emerged among all the coun­tries,” not­ing un­hap­pi­ness by the oth­er lead­ers at the NSA rev­el­a­tions as well as on­go­ing trade dis­putes.

The sched­ule calls for Obama to meet sep­ar­ately with Peña Ni­eto soon after ar­riv­ing in the Mex­ic­an pres­id­ent’s ho­met­own. Then, after a lunch with both of the oth­er lead­ers, the U.S. pres­id­ent will have what the White House is call­ing a “walk and talk” with Harp­er. That will be fol­lowed by a ses­sion with busi­ness lead­ers and ex­perts on North Amer­ica. Then, the three lead­ers will sit down for the ac­tu­al sum­mit meet­ing and a con­clud­ing press con­fer­ence where the lead­ers are ex­pec­ted to be pressed on the dif­fer­ences they want to keep out of pub­lic view.

Com­ing on the 20th an­niversary of the North Amer­ic­an Free Trade Agree­ment, the White House sees this sum­mit as a nat­ur­al for­um for dis­cuss­ing the next step in trade — the on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ations of the Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship. Both Canada and Mex­ico have joined the TPP talks in the last two years. “We are ob­vi­ously at a crit­ic­al point in work­ing to­wards fi­nal­iz­ing an am­bi­tious trade agree­ment “¦ that would en­com­pass roughly 40 per­cent of the glob­al eco­nomy in the TPP coun­tries,” a seni­or U.S. of­fi­cial said last week, call­ing the talks “an op­por­tun­ity to build on the work that was done in NAF­TA by in­tro­du­cing ad­di­tion­al stand­ards,”

What Ca­na­dian news­pa­pers have called the “drift” apart of Harp­er and Obama could make this the first North Amer­ic­an Lead­ers Sum­mit at which Amer­ic­an fric­tion with Canada threatens to over­shad­ow the usu­ally dom­in­ant dif­fer­ences between Wash­ing­ton and Mex­ico City. But that would re­quire Harp­er to do something no Ca­na­dian lead­er has done since Prime Min­is­ter Pierre Trudeau used to be­dev­il Pres­id­ent Re­agan. So Obama and Harp­er most likely will keep their dif­fer­ences out of pub­lic view.

“Canada has been very frus­trated over the years that the Key­stone de­cision has been put off, delayed,” said Joshua Meltzer, an ex­pert on glob­al trade at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. He ex­pects Harp­er “to push a little bit” to get Obama to move faster now that the State De­part­ment has is­sued its find­ings on the cli­mate im­pact of the pipeline. But Ar­turo Sarukhan, the former Mex­ic­an am­bas­sad­or to the United States who helped pre­pare sev­er­al of the pre­vi­ous Three Ami­gos sum­mits, said the is­sue “will not pop up” in the form­al talks among the three lead­ers.

“As someone who spent the past six years sort of or­gan­iz­ing and prep­ping for these tri­lat­er­al sum­mits, you usu­ally try to pre­vent the bi­lat­er­al agenda from seep­ing in­to the tri­lat­er­al “¦ be­cause it de­tracts from the more glob­al, hol­ist­ic North Amer­ic­an dis­cus­sions,” said Sarukhan. He said Key­stone is one of those is­sues that “you tend to try and push to the side­lines.”

U.S. of­fi­cials in­sist the pres­id­ent will tell Harp­er ex­actly what he has been say­ing in pub­lic — that the pro­cess has to play out. “What Pres­id­ent Obama will do is ex­plain to him where we are in the re­view of the Key­stone pipeline, and in­dic­ate that we’ll of course let our Ca­na­dian friends know when we’ve ar­rived at a de­cision,” said the seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial.

“Key­stone is one of those things where every­body sort of knows every­body’s po­s­i­tion ex­cept for the pres­id­ent’s,” said An­drew Finn, an as­so­ci­ate at the Canada In­sti­tute. “It is no secret what the prime min­is­ter’s thoughts are on the pipeline. And I don’t know what value there is to bring it up in this type of for­um. So my guess would be that it doesn’t.”

The same be­hind-closed-doors fate likely awaits and can­did dis­cus­sion between Obama and Peña Ni­eto on U.S. im­mig­ra­tion policy and Mex­ico’s in­ab­il­ity to halt the blood­shed of the drug car­tels. The private se­cur­ity dis­cus­sion may be in­tense, though, re­flect­ing Amer­ic­an un­hap­pi­ness with Peña Ni­eto’s de­cision to scale back U.S. as­sist­ance. “The frus­tra­tion on se­cur­ity is­sues “¦ is sort of un­der­ly­ing and bub­bling un­der­neath,” said Vanda Fel­bab-Brown, a seni­or fel­low at Brook­ings. She said she ex­pects it to bet “very little at­ten­tion and pub­lic play” in the pub­lic com­ments at Tolu­ca. But, she said, “it will be in the back­ground. It’s a very im­port­ant un­re­solved and dif­fi­cult is­sue even if the lead­ers” is­sue pub­lic state­ments on more up­beat is­sues.

Obama and Peña Ni­eto will also, of course, talk about the status of im­mig­ra­tion re­form. But that dis­cus­sion is likely to be more pro forma. Peña Ni­eto already knows the an­swers and already un­der­stands why Obama has failed to push through the re­forms he has ad­voc­ated throughout his pres­id­ency.

Pub­licly, ex­pect to hear praise from Obama for re­forms pushed through by Peña Ni­eto, end­ing the state mono­poly on the en­ergy in­dustry, over­haul­ing edu­ca­tion and tax policy. The Mex­ico In­sti­tute’s Wood said Peña Ni­eto wants to make this sum­mit his show to high­light what he has done in his one year in of­fice. It’s “really go­ing to be a show­case for Pres­id­ent Peña Ni­eto to high­light the fact that Mex­ico has emerged as a strong re­gion­al part­ner that is look­ing to get equal treat­ment and due re­spect from the oth­er North Amer­ic­an coun­tries.”

That calls, of course, for at least a few ab­razos, though they may be less en­thu­si­ast­ic than those demon­strated by Bush and Fox at that 2005 sum­mit in Waco. And that’s why, pub­licly at least, the lead­ers will put on a friendly and cor­di­al face and keep the ser­i­ous fric­tions out of sight.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
11 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×