FCC Moves to Revive Net-Neutrality Rules

The agency will try to protect access to Netflix, Google, and other websites.

 Ethernet cables lead to a server at the Rittal stand at the 2013 CeBIT technology trade fair the day before the fair opens to visitors on March 4, 2013 in Hanover, Germany.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
Feb. 19, 2014, 6:07 a.m.

The Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion an­nounced a plan Wed­nes­day to en­act new net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions aimed at en­sur­ing that In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders can’t choke off ac­cess to web­sites such as Net­flix, Google, and Skype.

Sup­port­ers of net neut­ral­ity ar­gue that the In­ter­net should be an open plat­form where all sites are treated equally. But Re­pub­lic­ans have long cri­ti­cized the concept for un­ne­ces­sar­ily re­strict­ing the busi­ness choices of In­ter­net pro­viders.

Without net-neut­ral­ity rules, In­ter­net pro­viders might slow down ac­cess to par­tic­u­lar web­sites un­less they pay for spe­cial In­ter­net “fast lanes.”

The FCC’s new rules, which have not yet been writ­ten, are un­likely to be as strong as the old reg­u­la­tions, which the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the D.C. Cir­cuit struck down last month.

FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er chose not to re­clas­si­fy broad­band pro­viders as “com­mon car­ri­ers” — which would have likely al­lowed the agency to re­in­state the old rules in their en­tirety but would have sparked a massive fight with con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans.

The agency also an­nounced it will not ap­peal the court’s rul­ing.

The old rules, en­acted in late 2010 by Wheel­er’s pre­de­cessor, Ju­li­us Gen­achow­ski, barred In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from block­ing or dis­crim­in­at­ing against web­sites. The rules were a 2008 cam­paign prom­ise from Pres­id­ent Obama, who has re­peatedly stated his sup­port for pro­tect­ing an open In­ter­net since tak­ing of­fice. But Ve­r­i­zon sued, claim­ing the agency over­stepped its au­thor­ity.

Last month, the D.C. Cir­cuit struck down the rules, say­ing the FCC was in­ap­pro­pri­ately treat­ing broad­band pro­viders as “com­mon car­ri­ers.” Tra­di­tion­al phone lines, rail­roads, air­lines, and oth­er ser­vices are con­sidered com­mon car­ri­ers and must of­fer ser­vice to every­one.

But the court also up­held broad FCC au­thor­ity to reg­u­late broad­band In­ter­net un­der Sec­tion 706 of the Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Act. The pro­vi­sion al­lows the agency to en­cour­age the de­ploy­ment of broad­band net­works and pro­mote com­pet­i­tion.

Lib­er­al ad­vocacy groups had urged the FCC to re­clas­si­fy broad­band as a com­mon car­ri­er ser­vice and re­in­state the rules. The move would have giv­en the agency sweep­ing reg­u­lat­ory power over broad­band pro­viders. Re­pub­lic­ans fiercely op­pose that op­tion, however, fear­ing that the agency would try to take over con­trol of the In­ter­net.

Free Press, a lib­er­al ad­vocacy group, ac­cused Wheel­er of cav­ing to pres­sure from Re­pub­lic­ans and in­dustry groups.

“If the agency really wants to stop cen­sor­ship, dis­crim­in­a­tion, and web­site block­ing, it must re­clas­si­fy broad­band,” Free Press Pres­id­ent Craig Aaron said in a state­ment.

Al­though Wheel­er chose to re­write the rules un­der Sec­tion 706, he said the the op­tion of re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band is still “on the table.”

Wheel­er said the goal of the new rules will still be to pre­vent In­ter­net pro­viders from block­ing or dis­crim­in­at­ing against web­sites. But the FCC will likely have to wa­ter down the nondis­crim­in­a­tion re­quire­ment, in par­tic­u­lar, to sur­vive fu­ture court chal­lenges.

FCC of­fi­cials said the agency will rely on a sep­ar­ate court rul­ing in­volving data-roam­ing reg­u­la­tions in which the D.C. Cir­cuit said the FCC has the power to re­quire com­pan­ies to of­fer “com­mer­cially reas­on­able terms.”

The agency will likely still be able to crack­down on an­ti­com­pet­it­ive be­ha­vi­or — such as if a broad­band pro­vider like Ve­r­i­zon slows Net­flix to a crawl to en­sure that cus­tom­ers still sub­scribe to cable-TV of­fer­ings. But it re­mains un­clear wheth­er the rules will en­tirely bar on­line dis­crim­in­a­tion. Pro­viders may be able to be­gin ex­per­i­ment­ing with new busi­ness mod­els in which they charge web­sites for pri­or­ity ac­cess to users.

Con­sumer ad­vocacy groups have warned that such a sys­tem would ru­in the open nature of the In­ter­net and han­di­cap small start-ups that can’t af­ford to pay In­ter­net tolls.

The new rules will ex­pand the trans­par­ency re­quire­ments of the ori­gin­al net-neut­ral­ity or­der, Wheel­er said. The re­quire­ments, which the court up­held, re­quire In­ter­net pro­viders to pub­licly dis­close how they man­age In­ter­net traffic.

The re­quire­ments al­low In­ter­net cus­tom­ers as well as Web com­pan­ies to know how dif­fer­ent pro­viders treat their traffic.

Wheel­er said the FCC will also look in­to oth­er op­por­tun­it­ies to pro­mote com­pet­i­tion for In­ter­net ser­vice, such as over­turn­ing leg­al re­stric­tions on the abil­ity of cit­ies and town to of­fer broad­band.

Con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats ap­plauded Wheel­er for mov­ing to pro­tect the open In­ter­net. But he will have to over­ride Re­pub­lic­an op­pos­i­tion to en­act the new rules.

Ajit Pai and Mi­chael O’Ri­elly, the two Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of the five-mem­ber com­mis­sion, is­sued state­ments warn­ing that the FCC is still act­ing without ad­equate leg­al au­thor­ity.

But Wheel­er ar­gued that he will craft the new rules to meet the re­quire­ments of the court’s de­cision.

“The FCC must stand strongly be­hind its re­spons­ib­il­ity to over­see the pub­lic in­terest stand­ard and en­sure that the In­ter­net re­mains open and fair,” he said.

“The In­ter­net is and must re­main the greatest en­gine of free ex­pres­sion, in­nov­a­tion, eco­nom­ic growth, and op­por­tun­ity the world has ever known. We must pre­serve and pro­mote the In­ter­net.”

What We're Following See More »
MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
16 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
17 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
16 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
SENATE JUDICIARY HEARING
Sally Yates to Testify on May 8
21 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login