For over a year, the Federal Reserve has said it planned to raise its benchmark interest rate — the one that’s currently near zero, and whose level ripples through interest rates across the economy — around the time that the nation’s unemployment rate hit 6.5 percent, so long as inflation wasn’t getting out of hand.
When Fed officials made that pledge in December 2012, unemployment was 7.9 percent. Now, as the jobless rate inches closer to the 6.5 percent threshold, the Fed is rethinking its stance, minutes from the central bank’s latest policy-setting meeting revealed Wednesday.
“Participants agreed that, with the unemployment rate approaching 6-1/2 percent, it would soon be appropriate for the Committee to change its forward guidance in order to provide information about its decisions regarding the federal funds rate after that threshold was crossed,” said the minutes from the late-January meeting, released after the customary three-week lag. Last month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said the jobless rate was 6.6 percent.
Fed officials don’t know what their new guidance will look like yet. Some of the Fed’s 10 voting policy-committee members thought it should be changed quantitatively; others thought a more flexible qualitative approach should be adopted. Several thought financial stability should join the unemployment and inflation measures that are intended to help the Fed convey to markets and Americans when they can expect rates to rise.
The Fed’s talk of changing its guidance dovetails with two broader economic discussions taking place. Although it has been falling, the U.S. unemployment rate is no longer seen as a great window into the health of the labor market. Part of its rapid decline, from 7.2 percent in October to 6.6 percent in January, was due to people dropping out of the labor force. Some were doing so for the “right” reasons — i.e., baby boomers retiring — and others for the “wrong” reasons — i.e., those becoming discouraged with the labor-force situation and dropping out. It’s tough to use the shorthand of the headline rate to convey that distinction. The persistent problems of long-term unemployment and underemployment are also not captured by the BLS’s primary jobless rate.
Fed policymakers grappled with another key question in late January: how much the downward trend in labor-force participation is due to structural factors, like demographics, and how much is due to cyclical factors, like the weak recovery. “The extent of the cyclical portion of the decline was viewed by some as difficult to gauge at present,” the minutes said.
The January meeting was Ben Bernanke’s last as Fed chair; when the Fed policymakers next convene, on March 18-19, Janet Yellen will be leading the board.
What We're Following See More »
Just a day after Donald Trump called her a bigot, Hillary Clinton delivered a scathing speech tying Trump to the KKK and so-called “alt-right.” This new frontier of debate between the two candidates has emerged at a time when Trump has been seeking to appeal to minority voters, among whom he has struggled to garner support. Calling him “profoundly dangerous,” Clinton didn’t hold back on her criticisms of Trump. “He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party,” Clinton said.
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 51%-41% in a new Quinnipiac poll released today. Her lead shrinks to seven points when the third-party candidates are included. In that scenario, she leads 45%-38%, with Gary Johnson pulling 10% and Jill Stein at 4%.
Is the Clinton family backtracking on some of its promises to insulate the White House from the Clinton Foundation? Opposition researchers will certainly try to portray it that way. A foundation spokesman said yesterday that Chelsea Clinton will stay on its board, and that the "foundation’s largest project, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, might continue to accept foreign government and corporate funding."
"Four Iranian ships made reckless maneuvers close to a U.S. warship this week, the Pentagon said Thursday, in an incident that officials said could have led to dangerous escalation." The four Iranian vessels engaged in a "high-speed intercept" of a U.S. destroyer in the Strait of Hormuz. A Navy spokesman said the Iranina actions "created a dangerous, harassing situation that could have led to further escalation including additional defensive measures" by the destroyer.