The Era of Big Deficit Concerns Is Over

With spending down and only the hardest choices left, deficit reduction has lost steam.

Supporters of republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney stand next to a national debt clock during a rally at Exeter High School on January 8, 2012 in Exeter, New Hampshire.
National Journal
Alex Seitz Wald
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Seitz-Wald
Feb. 20, 2014, 4 p.m.

After a three-year ob­ses­sion with clos­ing Amer­ica’s gap­ing budget hole, Wash­ing­ton, it seems, has moved on.

Last month’s budget deal, which put a mo­ment­ary end to the cliffs and crises that have dom­in­ated fisc­al poli­cy­mak­ing since the tea party came to Con­gress, coupled with a rap­idly shrink­ing short-term de­fi­cit, has driv­en the na­tion’s budget im­bal­ances quickly and quietly from the agenda.

And no one un­der­stands this bet­ter than Maya MacGuineas, who runs Fix the Debt, the most vo­cal anti-de­fi­cit group in the cap­it­al. Re­cog­niz­ing the new real­ity, the cam­paign is re­du­cing its staff, slow­ing activ­it­ies, and re­struc­tur­ing it­self for a goal that it read­ily ad­mits is now some­where over the ho­ri­zon. One out­side ally de­scribed the group as go­ing in­to “hi­berna­tion mode.”

“We’re morph­ing in­to a sort of longer-term co­ali­tion and chan­ging our struc­ture to re­flect the fact that this is go­ing to be a long game,” MacGuineas told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I hope that something can hap­pen after the midterms, but I think in all like­li­hood that it doesn’t hap­pen un­til after 2016.”

While it’s easy to miss the dis­ap­pear­ance of something, the change is glar­ing if you know where to look. You can see it on the House and Sen­ate floors where, last month, Re­pub­lic­ans uttered the word “debt” just 225 times, down from 3,188 men­tions in Ju­ly 2011, ac­cord­ing to the Sun­light Found­a­tion. You could see it in Pres­id­ent Obama’s latest State of the Uni­on ad­dress, which men­tioned budget de­fi­cits al­most two-thirds few­er times than his 2011 speech.

And you can see it in opin­ion polling. Among the 20 or so pub­lic-policy goals that Pew reg­u­larly asks voters to pri­or­it­ize, re­du­cing the de­fi­cit fell faster than any oth­er in the poll­ster’s latest sur­vey, drop­ping 9 points from Janu­ary 2013 to Janu­ary 2014. That put the is­sue in sixth place, down from third just a year ago.

It’s a big change from June 2012, when Pew Re­search Cen­ter Pres­id­ent Andy Ko­hut wrote, “In my years of polling, there has nev­er been an is­sue such as the de­fi­cit on which there has been such a con­sensus among the pub­lic about its im­port­ance.”

The Can Kicks Back, a spin-off from Fix the Debt aimed at or­gan­iz­ing mil­len­ni­als around the is­sue, is now in debt it­self and strug­gling to stay aloft. “Without fun­drais­ing mir­acles … I don’t know how we both sus­tain [an] or­gan­iz­a­tion and do mean­ing­ful things,” cofounder Nick Troi­ano wrote in an in­tern­al email ob­tained by Politico.

MacGuineas says that Fix the Debt still has plenty of money, but that it wants to pre­serve its re­sources for a polit­ic­al mo­ment more ripe for a “grand bar­gain” that would dra­mat­ic­ally re­duce long-term budget de­fi­cits. “People are happy to take a breath­er,” she said, not­ing that tack­ling the is­sue will re­quire dif­fi­cult choices.

So Fix the Debt is study­ing what oth­er polit­ic­al move­ments have done after their is­sues fell off the agenda, MacGuineas said. She’s hop­ing to learn les­sons about stay­ing rel­ev­ant while in the polit­ic­al wil­der­ness, maybe from the cli­mate-change move­ment, which kept its head above wa­ter even after the col­lapse of cap-and-trade le­gis­la­tion in 2010.

Alex Lawson, who has of­ten battled with de­fi­cit hawks as ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of So­cial Se­cur­ity Works, a group work­ing to pre­serve en­ti­tle­ment pro­grams, ad­mits feel­ing some schaden­freudeat his ideo­lo­gic­al foils’ struggles. “I won’t hide the fact that I’ve got­ten a lot of joy out of watch­ing it,” he said. “The grand-bar­gain­eers had a grip on the mi­cro­phone for so long, and it was like we couldn’t talk about any of the oth­er things we need to talk about.”

In­deed, as the gov­ern­ment’s fisc­al situ­ation has im­proved — de­fi­cits fell to a sev­en-year low as a share of the over­all eco­nomy, ac­cord­ing to the non­par­tis­an Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice, even though the debt re­mains enorm­ous — fisc­al con­ser­vat­ives have star­ted ven­tur­ing bey­ond nar­row goals of re­du­cing gov­ern­ment spend­ing.

Re­pub­lic­ans such as Sen. Marco Ru­bio and Rep. Paul Ry­an, both po­ten­tial pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates, are in­creas­ingly dis­cuss­ing new ideas to tackle un­em­ploy­ment and re­duce poverty. The Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute has taken a lead in de­vel­op­ing ideas it hopes will ex­pand the GOP’s eco­nom­ic-polit­ics play­book bey­ond con­cerns about the size of gov­ern­ment.

Demo­crats, mean­while, are em­bra­cing a strain of eco­nom­ic pop­u­lism lite that con­cerns it­self less with short-term de­fi­cits and debt. Just un­der half of Demo­crat­ic voters now view de­fi­cit re­duc­tion as a top pri­or­ity, down 18 points from last Janu­ary, ac­cord­ing to Pew.

With no more “ac­tion-for­cing mo­ments” like the fisc­al cliff, MacGuineas said, polit­ic­al lead­ers are happy to move on to oth­er is­sues.

The latest of those mo­ments came this month when the gov­ern­ment again came close to run­ning up against the debt ceil­ing. In the past, Re­pub­lic­ans had de­man­ded that a deal to raise the debt lim­it con­tain equal spend­ing cuts, but this time the GOP al­lowed a clean in­crease without much of a fight.

“The policies solu­tions are still so un­pleas­ant that every­one, politi­cians and voters, feels a bit of com­fort if they think they can push it un­der the car­pet,” MacGuineas said.

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×