Arkansas Just Funded Its Medicaid Expansion — but the Fight Isn’t Over

The state Legislature narrowly renewed the “private option” plan, but the program’s future remains uncertain.

National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
March 4, 2014, 11:21 a.m.

Arkan­sas’s ver­sion of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act is weakened, but safe … for now.

After sev­er­al weeks of un­cer­tainty, the Arkan­sas House and Sen­ate each ap­proved fund­ing for the state’s “private op­tion,” which takes fed­er­al dol­lars for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion and uses them to buy private in­sur­ance plans for low-in­come in­di­vidu­als on the ex­change.

The Sen­ate ap­proved the le­gis­la­tion first on a 27-8 vote Feb. 20. After four failed votes, the House passed the bill Tues­day on a 76-24 vote.

However, the ac­tion re­news the pro­gram for only a year, and op­pon­ents re­main com­mit­ted to con­tinu­ing the fight.

The re­place­ment of a Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or by a Re­pub­lic­an who op­posed the private op­tion in a spe­cial elec­tion earli­er this year, plus one or two oth­er mem­bers switch­ing their vote, brought the fu­ture of the pro­gram — which has to be reau­thor­ized an­nu­ally — in­to ques­tion.

The bill had been held up in the House for the past few weeks, a few votes shy of the su­per­ma­jor­ity re­quired to pass spend­ing bills in the Arkan­sas Le­gis­lature. The state re­quires three-quar­ters ap­prov­al for pas­sage, or 75 out of 100 votes in the House and 27 out of 35 in the Sen­ate.

To achieve the ne­ces­sary vote count, the ori­gin­al com­prom­ise plan was amended this time around to ap­pease op­pon­ents, and these changes tar­get the fu­ture of the plan, as well as the over­all health care law in the state.

One of the main amend­ments, writ­ten by Re­pub­lic­an state Rep. Nate Bell, pro­hib­its any state funds from go­ing to­ward pro­mo­tion or out­reach of the ACA in the state. This in­cludes en­roll­ment in the private op­tion, as well as the over­all ex­change. Bell — an un­abashed crit­ic of the private op­tion and the health care law — has said he ul­ti­mately wants the pro­gram to fail, and that this amend­ment is in­ten­ded to sty­mie en­roll­ment.

“I be­lieve it’s im­port­ant as a con­ser­vat­ive that we re­cog­nize the situ­ation we’re in,” he said on the House floor dur­ing an earli­er vote last month. “When we can de­feat bad policy, we should do so. When we can’t de­feat bad policy, it’s our re­spons­ib­il­ity to do everything we can to in­flu­ence it and make it as closely aligned with our philo­sophy and policy as we can.”

Fund­ing for the private op­tion is in­cluded in the lar­ger ap­pro­pri­ations bill for the state’s De­part­ment of Hu­man Ser­vices, which means that either way, a su­per­ma­jor­ity had to agree to pass the bill — with or without the private op­tion — by the end of the le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion.

The amend­ments were in­ten­ded to make fund­ing the private op­tion more pal­at­able to mem­bers who op­pose fur­ther spend­ing on a pro­gram they see as im­pli­citly linked to Obama­care, and avoid what Bell called the “im­passe” in the budget stan­doff.

Bell and oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans who sup­por­ted the bill but op­pose the private op­tion have already vowed to con­tin­ue the fight against the pro­gram next year.

Giv­en the ex­per­i­ment­al nature of the private op­tion in Arkan­sas, it will con­tin­ue to be eval­u­ated reg­u­larly. The amend­ments passed Tues­day are in­ten­ded to weak­en the fu­ture of the pro­gram while main­tain­ing it for cur­rent en­rollees, un­til op­pon­ents gain more lever­age against it.

“For those who feel like I’ve be­trayed you, we’ll be back next year,” Re­pub­lic­an state Rep. Kim Ham­mer said ahead of the fi­nal vote. “If the pro­gram doesn’t work, I’ll vote against it.” Ham­mer was one of three no votes to flip Tues­day, along with fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans Les Car­nine and Mary Lou Slink­ard.

For now, the bill will be sent to Demo­crat­ic Gov. Mike Beebe, who plans to sign it. The le­gis­la­tion’s pas­sage en­sures that the ap­prox­im­ately 100,000 Arkansans who have already en­rolled in the private op­tion will keep their in­sur­ance cov­er­age an­oth­er year. If the Le­gis­lature failed to re­new fund­ing for the pro­gram, these in­di­vidu­als would have been kicked off their plans after June 30.

We can ex­pect a po­ten­tially even big­ger fight next year, when the private op­tion will need to be re­newed once again.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
11 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×