The head of the Federal Communications Commission is trying to douse Republican accusations that his agency is trying to covertly police the editorial decisions of TV news.
In a letter to senior House Republicans released Thursday, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the agency “has no intention of regulating political or other speech of journalists or broadcasters.”
Republicans have picked at an FCC study introduced last spring on “critical information needs” that is intended to examine barriers of entry into the news media industry for small businesses. The study’s inquiry included questions such as: “What is the news philosophy of the station?” and “Who decides which stories are covered?”
The FCC is required by law to conduct such research studies, but the commission’s critics say this one was an initial foray into an effort to regulate newsrooms’ editorial decisions.
The questions the study asked, Republicans say, tread too close for comfort to the now-defunct Fairness Doctrine, a controversial federal policy that required radio and TV news to present opposing views of the news stories they covered. The policy was in effect from 1949 through 1987 and was formally wiped from the books in 2011.
But Wheeler insists that’s not happening, defending the FCC study as a “tool intended to help the Commission consider effective, pro-competitive policies that would encourage new entrants,” and told Republicans that the commission is revising the study to address their concerns.
Wheeler’s assurances didn’t go far enough for House Republicans, who urged the agency to “stay out of the newsroom” in a statement Thursday.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a Republican, called attention to the study in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal last week, saying that the FCC study wants to “thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country.”
Although participation is voluntary, Pai is concerned that stations will feel pressured to participate because they depend on the FCC for a broadcast license.
House Republicans shared similar concerns with Wheeler in December, calling the study a “Fairness Doctrine 2.0.”
“The proposed design for the [Critical Information Needs] study shows a startling disregard for not only the bedrock constitutional principles that prevent government intrusion into the press and other news media, but also for the lessons learned by the Commission’s experience with the Fairness Doctrine,” Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee wrote.
UPDATE: Chairman Tom Wheeler has directed that all questions about news philosophy and editorial judgement be removed from the draft study. “Any suggestion the Commission intends to regulate the speech of news media is false,” FCC spokeswoman Shannon Gilson said Friday. A revised study will be released within the next few weeks.
FURTHER UPDATE: The FCC announced Friday that it will no longer ask the media or journalists to participate in its study, a move that was welcomed by Pai. The FCC will still proceed with the second part of the controversial study”“designed by the research firm Social Solutions International”“that aims to understand the “critical information needs” of communities. This will involve polling a sampling of residents about how they consume the news in Columbia, S.C., the pilot location for the study.
What We're Following See More »
A Navy destroyer sailed within 12 miles of an artificial island built by China in the South China Sea, one of several such islands at the center of territorial disputes with other nearby nations. The U.S. called it a "freedom of navigation exercise." Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Ren Guoqiang "said China had lodged stern representations to the U.S over the patrol and that such moves were not conducive to peace and stability in the South China Sea."
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Greg Gianforte, the Montana Republican candidate for the state's lone House seat, was cited for misdemeanor assault Wednesday night after he allegedly body-slammed Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Jacobs entered a room in which Gianforte was preparing to give an interview to Fox News, and asked Gianforte about the recently released CBO score on health care legislation, at which point, according to an account from Fox News's Alicia Acuna, Gianforte put both hands around Jacobs's neck and slammed him to the ground. The Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office put out a statement saying there was probable cause for the citation but not the injuries required for it to be considered a felony. Gianforte's aide put out an erroneous statement saying Jacobs grabbed Gianforte by the wrist after aggressively putting a recorder in Gianforte's face.