Same-Sex Marriage Decision in Utah Could Go All the Way to the Supreme Court This Fall

A decade after 11 states banned gay marriage, gay-rights advocates are gaining ground over their opponents.

National Journal
Sarah Mimms and Brian McGill
June 25, 2014, 11:45 a.m.

A case in Utah could be the first leg­al chal­lenge to same-sex mar­riages bans at the state level to make it to the U.S. Su­preme Court this fall.

A three-judge pan­el for the 10th Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals ruled Wed­nes­day that Utah’s ban on same-sex mar­riage is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. “We hold that the Four­teenth Amend­ment pro­tects the fun­da­ment­al right to marry, es­tab­lish a fam­ily, raise chil­dren, and en­joy the full pro­tec­tion of a state’s mar­it­al laws,” the pan­el wrote. “A state may not deny the is­su­ance of a mar­riage li­cense to two per­sons, or re­fuse to re­cog­nize their mar­riage, based solely upon the sex of the per­sons in the mar­riage uni­on.”

The judges did, however, grant a stay. Same-sex mar­riages will not yet be per­formed in Utah while state At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Sean Reyes, a Re­pub­lic­an, pur­sues an ap­peal. Reyes has already said he will ap­peal the case to the na­tion’s highest court, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted.

The de­cision rep­res­ents the broad­est rul­ing on same-sex mar­riage yet by a Cir­cuit Court, Sarah War­bel­ow, the leg­al dir­ect­or for the Hu­man Rights Cam­paign, a gay-rights ad­vocacy group, said Wed­nes­day. That could set up the Utah case for a Su­preme Court battle when the Court re­sumes in Oc­to­ber.

War­bel­ow noted, however, that sim­il­ar cases are be­ing heard in oth­er Cir­cuit Courts across the coun­try, any of which could be brought up by the Su­preme Court. For ex­ample, the 10th Cir­cuit Court is also con­sid­er­ing a case con­cern­ing Ok­lahoma’s re­fus­al to re­cog­nize same-sex mar­riages per­formed out-of-state. A de­cision in that case, which was ar­gued at the same time as the Utah case, could come any time. And, al­though it deals solely with out-of-state mar­riages, it could be in­ter­preted broadly by the Court and used to leg­al­ize mar­riage with­in Ok­lahoma’s bor­ders as well.

Also Wed­nes­day, a lower fed­er­al court ruled that In­di­ana’s ban on same-sex mar­riage is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. The judge did not grant a stay and called on the state to be­gin is­su­ing mar­riage li­censes. At least one justice has already be­gun do­ing so, ac­cord­ing to War­bel­ow, but giv­en the at­tor­ney gen­er­al’s de­cision to ap­peal, those is­su­ances could come to a halt at any time.

It is un­clear how the In­di­ana de­cision will af­fect the state Le­gis­lature’s push to add a ban on same-sex mar­riage to the state’s con­sti­tu­tion. Al­though the state has had a law on the books ban­ning same-sex mar­riage for years, the state con­sti­tu­tion is one of the few in the coun­try that nev­er had one. The Le­gis­lature passed a con­sti­tu­tion­al ban earli­er this year, but will have to pass it again in the 2015 or 2016 le­gis­lat­ive ses­sions. Only then can it ap­pear on the 2016 bal­lot, where voters will also have to ap­prove of the ban in or­der for it to be ad­ded to the state’s con­sti­tu­tion.

The de­cisions in Utah and In­di­ana fol­low a grow­ing na­tion­al pat­tern. Since the Su­preme Court struck down the De­fense of Mar­riage Act last sum­mer, judges across the coun­try have ruled against bans on same-sex mar­riage in nearly every case brought be­fore them. A fed­er­al court in Mis­sis­sippi is the only one this year to have ruled against same-sex mar­riage and that case is on ap­peal.

At­tor­neys are now ar­guing cases in fa­vor of same-sex mar­riage in every state that does not cur­rently al­low it.

Just a dec­ade after Mas­sachu­setts be­came the first state in the na­tion to leg­al­ize same-sex mar­riage, gay couples in 19 states and the Dis­trict of Columbia can now marry. In sev­en oth­er states so far this year, a judge has ruled in fa­vor of gay mar­riage but gran­ted a stay to halt those uni­ons while the cases are on ap­peal.

Forty-four per­cent of Amer­ic­ans now live in a state that al­lows same-sex mar­riage, ac­cord­ing to the Hu­man Rights Cam­paign, while three oth­er states have leg­al­ized civil uni­ons and do­mest­ic part­ner­ships.

In a sign of chan­ging times, the fight over mar­riage rights is over­whelm­ingly be­ing waged by act­iv­ists who fa­vor same-sex mar­riage, rather than those work­ing to re­strict mar­riage to het­ero­sexu­al couples. A dec­ade after 11 states passed con­sti­tu­tion­al bans on same-sex mar­riage thanks to a co­ordin­ated ef­fort by sup­port­ers of former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush to boost his poll num­bers, only one state — In­di­ana — is cur­rently pur­su­ing lim­it­a­tions to the mar­riage rights of same-sex couples. Mean­while, ef­forts are un­der­way in 31 states to ex­pand them.

Le­gis­latures in sev­en states — Ari­zona, Idaho, Kan­sas, Ohio, South Dakota, Ten­ness­ee, and Utah — have pushed bills that would al­low busi­nesses that ob­ject on re­li­gious grounds to re­fuse ser­vice to same-sex couples. Ari­zona Gov. Jan Brew­er, a Re­pub­lic­an, ve­toed such le­gis­la­tion in her state in Feb­ru­ary.

Take a look at the cur­rent battle­ground over same-sex mar­riage be­low, in­clud­ing cur­rent laws in all 50 states, law­suits filed by same-sex couples to over­turn state bans, and state le­gis­latures that are work­ing to al­ter their mar­riage laws.

We’ll keep this up­dated peri­od­ic­ally with new cases and le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts. See something we missed? Send us an email.

Roll over a state to find out more in­form­a­tion. For a stat­ic im­age of this map, click here.

This art­icle was up­dated on June 25, 2014.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
15 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×