Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is asking for another round of base closures as part of the fiscal 2015 budget request — just don’t expect members of Congress to go along quietly.
The top Pentagon official asked for a new round of base realignment and closure in 2017, but acknowledged that he faces an uphill fight on the Hill. “I am mindful that Congress has not agreed to our BRAC requests in the last two years,” Hagel said.
And it’s a familiar fight for the department, which asked for a round of BRAC when it presented its budget last year, as well as the year before that. But the idea was quickly shot down by members of Congress in both chambers and parties.
“The one thing on the Hill where I always found unanimity is on opposition to BRAC,” Eric Fanning, the undersecretary for the Air Force, said Tuesday morning at a Washington defense conference.
Fanning said Pentagon officials have been on the Hill discussing the trade-offs the department faces with the budget crunch.
Rising costs from a 2005 recommendations for BRAC left some members of Congress hesitant to try again. The BRAC commission originally estimated that it would cost the Pentagon $21 billion to follow its recommendations, but, according to a 2012 GAO report, the cost ended up around $35.1 billion.
But Hagel said that if Congress “continues to block these requests even as they slash the overall budget,” department officials will look for other ways to reduce infrastructure.
And one of those options is closing bases in Europe, which aren’t subject to the BRAC commission’s approval. Hagel said the Pentagon will pursue another round of base closings and realignment based on recommendations from the European Infrastructure Consolidation Review this spring.
And Hagel noted that “in Europe, where BRAC authority is not needed, we have reduced our infrastructure by 30 percent since 2000.”
There could be another — admittedly obscure — work-around.
House Armed Services staffer Vickie Plunkett said at a conference earlier this month that Section 2687 of Title 10, which regulates the Defense Department, would allow the Pentagon to close bases and “only requires notification to Congress” before the closure takes place.
“The authorities only require notification. Take your chances, because it’s going to require us to get our act together to stop it,” she said.
What We're Following See More »
The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."
"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."
"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "
"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.