Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee plan to introduce a bill to “eradicate” a controversial Federal Communications Commission study that was going to question journalists and media owners.
A firestorm erupted last week over a FCC study — formally introduced last summer — that intended to ask print and broadcast newsrooms questions about editorial judgment and news philosophy as part of a broad analysis on “critical information needs” and barriers to entry in the media.
House Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden announced Tuesday that the committee will hold a hearing on the “chilling” study in the near future, as well as introduce legislation to stop the study from taking place altogether.
“The very existence of this [critical information needs] study is an affront to the First Amendment and should have never been proposed in the first place,” the Oregon congressman wrote in a statement.
Last week, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler tried to assuage Republicans’ concerns that the commission wants to police newsrooms, and eventually removed the portion of the study that involved media owners and journalists. But he said the FCC will proceed with a second part of the study — designed by the research firm Social Solutions International — that polls a sampling of residents about how they consume the news in Columbia, S.C., the pilot location for the study.
But Walden says this does not go far enough and wants the FCC to discontinue the whole study.
Walden and other Republicans say the study violates the First Amendment, and they have suggested it is an underhand attempt to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, a controversial policy that required radio and TV news to present opposing views of the news stories they covered from 1949 to 1987.
The debate was sparked by an op-ed criticizing the study by FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai for The Wall Street Journal on Feb. 10, although Republican lawmakers raised concerns with Wheeler in December.
The FCC is required by law to conduct such research studies as part of effort to encourage greater diversity.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.