Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee plan to introduce a bill to “eradicate” a controversial Federal Communications Commission study that was going to question journalists and media owners.
A firestorm erupted last week over a FCC study — formally introduced last summer — that intended to ask print and broadcast newsrooms questions about editorial judgment and news philosophy as part of a broad analysis on “critical information needs” and barriers to entry in the media.
House Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden announced Tuesday that the committee will hold a hearing on the “chilling” study in the near future, as well as introduce legislation to stop the study from taking place altogether.
“The very existence of this [critical information needs] study is an affront to the First Amendment and should have never been proposed in the first place,” the Oregon congressman wrote in a statement.
Last week, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler tried to assuage Republicans’ concerns that the commission wants to police newsrooms, and eventually removed the portion of the study that involved media owners and journalists. But he said the FCC will proceed with a second part of the study — designed by the research firm Social Solutions International — that polls a sampling of residents about how they consume the news in Columbia, S.C., the pilot location for the study.
But Walden says this does not go far enough and wants the FCC to discontinue the whole study.
Walden and other Republicans say the study violates the First Amendment, and they have suggested it is an underhand attempt to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, a controversial policy that required radio and TV news to present opposing views of the news stories they covered from 1949 to 1987.
The debate was sparked by an op-ed criticizing the study by FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai for The Wall Street Journal on Feb. 10, although Republican lawmakers raised concerns with Wheeler in December.
The FCC is required by law to conduct such research studies as part of effort to encourage greater diversity.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.