Say you’re hiking through the woods. You fall, break your leg, and can’t walk. You call 911. How do you tell rescuers to find you? Right now, you’d have to read out your latitude and longitude, for example: 39.341324, -77.716231.
But what if you could send them to the same location by simply saying “mathematics.pelt.skis”?
Or say you’re attending an event at a downtown hotel that, despite its single address, borders several different streets and has multiple entrances. You could print out a lengthy list of directions to the correct entrance — or the event’s organizers could just tell you to arrive at onion.peanut.boats.
This alternative mapping is the brainchild of the London-based company what3words, which has divided the globe into 57 trillion 3-by-3-meter squares, assigning each a random three-word identifier.
The goal is to provide more-precise locations when conventional addresses aren’t adequate — without the clunky 16-digit GPS coordinates that are the current alternative.
“Giving people post codes and even street addresses is just not accurate enough,” said Chris Sheldrick, one of the company’s founders. “[Latitude and longitude] is really impractical. It’s like giving your phone number to someone — twice.”¦ Let’s get the accuracy of GPS coordinates, but let’s get a human-friendly way to get people to use them.”
The company — run from vibes.ledge.double — launched its product in July of last year, but this week it finally turned loose a sales team and is preparing a new, native app that will include directions to its locations.
The map-reading program, Sheldrick says, has nearly endless utilities. In Australia, some emergency responders are planning to use what3words to better find people who need help. Helicopter pilots say it will make it easier to find landing zones. Other navigation apps want to incorporate it to make location-finding more user-friendly. And everyday people could use it to find one another at a music festival or other large venue.
“The world of events could have a very positive platform,” Sheldrick said, citing his own background as an event-logistics organizer. The difficulty of herding volunteers — especially in a rural environment — to a specific spot proved the difficulty of providing locations using conventional addressing.
Another possibility? “We could really revolutionize efficiency for deliveries,” Sheldrick said, especially for “anybody going anywhere for the first time. How often is that information reliable?” Delivery companies, he said, have expressed lots of interest in using what3words — including a Dubai company that plans to integrate it into its launch next month.
But, of course, for those three words to mean anything but gibberish, more people will have to become familiar with the app. Sheldrick says it makes too much sense not to catch on. “I genuinely believe adoption will be fast,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."