Governors Seek to Block Food-Stamp Cuts

Members of the Democratic Governors Association listen while Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin, chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, makes a statement outside the West Wing of the White House on February 21, 2014 in Washington. Members of the Democratic Governors Association spoke to the press after attending a meeting with US President Barack Obama and US Vice President Joe Biden.
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Billy House
Feb. 25, 2014, 3:32 p.m.

Sev­er­al gov­ernors are try­ing to thwart at­tempts to re­duce food-stamp pay­ments to their states, in a move that could af­fect por­tions of the re­cently passed farm bill aimed at sav­ing $8.6 bil­lion over the next 10 years.

While con­gres­sion­al aides con­ceded Tues­day that the moves could have some im­pact on pro­jec­ted sav­ings in the fed­er­al budget, they say it is too early to tell ex­actly how sig­ni­fic­ant that im­pact might be.

Demo­crat­ic Govs. Peter Shum­lin of Ver­mont and Dev­al Patrick of Mas­sachu­setts have in­dic­ated they are con­sid­er­ing such moves; Con­necti­c­ut’s Dan­nel Mal­loy made his in­ten­tions clear in a state­ment this week.

“Con­necti­c­ut, for one, will not stand by while our low-in­come fam­il­ies and eld­ers are put at risk by Wash­ing­ton polit­ics,” Mal­loy said.

Mal­loy said Con­necti­c­ut is mov­ing to main­tain cur­rent levels of food-stamp, or Sup­ple­ment Nu­tri­tion­al As­sist­ance Pro­gram, be­ne­fits and has dir­ec­ted his ad­min­is­tra­tion to “take all ne­ces­sary meas­ures to pro­tect be­ne­fi­ciar­ies from the neg­at­ive con­sequences of the farm bill.”

What the gov­ernors have in mind amounts to an end run around a new set of re­quire­ments that gov­erns how re­cip­i­ents re­ceive food-stamp as­sist­ance in the states.

The farm bill’s much-touted re­duc­tions were brought about largely by chan­ging eli­gib­il­ity re­quire­ments for food stamps, which are based in some cases on low-in­come heat­ing as­sist­ance provided by the states. As many as 17 states could pay out as little as $1 to re­cip­i­ents to boost that per­son’s eli­gib­il­ity for food aid. The farm bill changed that re­quire­ment to at least $20.01, and the as­sump­tion was that the fed­er­al fund­ing for the food-stamps pro­gram would de­crease as a res­ult.

Yet in an ef­fort to avoid the cuts, Con­necti­c­ut of­fi­cials have shif­ted an ad­ded $1.4 mil­lion of funds avail­able un­der the Con­necti­c­ut En­ergy As­sist­ance Pro­gram to meet the new threshold. The move is ex­pec­ted to pre­serve about $66.6 mil­lion in an­nu­al food-stamp be­ne­fits for house­holds in Con­necti­c­ut.

Pas­sage of the farm bill and its $8.6 bil­lion cut to food stamps capped a long and di­vis­ive ne­go­ti­ation between the House and Sen­ate, a sig­ni­fic­ant amount of which was fo­cused on con­ser­vat­ive de­mands to cut the SNAP pay­ments.

House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Frank Lu­cas and Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Debbie Stabenow had no im­me­di­ate com­ment on what the gov­ernors are do­ing.

Con­gres­sion­al budget aud­it­ors, in ana­lyz­ing the sav­ings pro­jec­ted by rais­ing the heat­ing-as­sist­ance threshold, an­ti­cip­ated that some states might move to pre­vent the cuts. The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice sug­ges­ted that be­cause of budget­ary con­straints, “it seems un­likely that a state would give more than $20 to every house­hold that had been re­ceiv­ing less than $20, but it is an op­tion that is open to states.”

Con­gres­sion­al aides said that even if the sav­ings do come up less than pro­jec­ted, there are oth­er as­pects of the bill that will help lower costs. For in­stance, the bill es­tab­lishes a pi­lot pro­gram to en­cour­age food-stamp re­cip­i­ents to seek jobs.

What We're Following See More »
TWO YEARS OF WORK FOR UKRAINE
Manafort Formally Registers as Foreign Agent
58 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A consulting firm led by Paul Manafort, who chaired Donald Trump’s presidential campaign for several months last year, retroactively filed forms Tuesday showing that his firm received $17.1 million over two years from a political party that dominated Ukraine before its leader fled to Russia in 2014."

Source:
HOUSE INTEL HEARING JULY 24
Roger Stone to Testify in Closed Session
58 minutes ago
THE LATEST
UNTIL AFTER RECESS
Health Care Vote Delayed
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
SO SAYS CORNYN
Senate Procedural Vote Now Coming on Wednesday
19 hours ago
THE LATEST
MCCONNELL’S BACK AGAINST THE WALL
Heller, Paul Won’t Vote on Motion to Proceed
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login