State Department Watchdog: No Conflict of Interest in Keystone Review

The finding is a blow to environmentalists battling the Keystone pipeline.

Pipe is stacked at the southern site of the Keystone XL pipeline on March 22, 2012 in Cushing, Oklahoma. U.S. President Barack Obama is pressing federal agencies to expedite the section of the Keystone XL pipeline between Oklahoma and the Gulf Coast.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Feb. 26, 2014, 1:18 p.m.

The State De­part­ment’s in­spect­or gen­er­al said Wed­nes­day that the de­part­ment fol­lowed in­tern­al guidelines in se­lect­ing the con­tract­or that stud­ied the pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline and that the pro­cess to gauge po­ten­tial con­flicts of in­terest was “ef­fect­ive.”

However, the re­port also finds that the “pro­cess for doc­u­ment­ing the con­tract­or-se­lec­tion pro­cess, in­clud­ing the con­flict-of-in­terest re­view, can be im­proved.”

The re­port fol­lows al­leg­a­tions by en­vir­on­ment­al­ists and anti-Key­stone Demo­crats that the con­tract­or who stud­ied the pipeline, En­vir­on­ment­al Re­sources Man­age­ment, suffered from con­flicts of in­terest in weigh­ing the en­vir­on­ment­al foot­print of Tran­sCanada Corp.’s pro­posed pipeline.

However, the Of­fice of the In­spect­or Gen­er­al re­port states: “In the case of con­cerns raised about ERM’s al­leged lack of ob­jectiv­ity be­cause cur­rent ERM staff had pre­vi­ously worked for Tran­sCanada and oth­er oil and pipeline com­pan­ies, OIG found that the de­part­ment’s con­flict of in­terest re­view was ef­fect­ive and that the re­view’s con­clu­sions were reas­on­able.”

It states that “a reas­on­able re­view was un­der­taken to in­de­pend­ently eval­u­ate ERM’s cer­ti­fic­a­tion that it had no con­flict of in­terest.”

The re­port fol­lows a re­cent State De­part­ment ana­lys­is, con­duc­ted by ERM, find­ing that build­ing Key­stone would be un­likely to cause a surge in green­house-gas emis­sions, al­though al­tern­at­ive scen­ari­os modeled showed a big­ger cli­mate foot­print.

The OIG find­ing, com­bined with the en­vir­on­ment­al ana­lys­is re­leased in late Janu­ary, quickly buoyed pipeline sup­port­ers.

“With this de­vel­op­ment, the path should be clear for the State De­part­ment to is­sue an af­firm­at­ive na­tion­al in­terest de­term­in­a­tion based on the mer­it and im­port­ance of this much-needed en­ergy in­fra­struc­ture pro­ject for the na­tion,” said Sen. John Ho­even, a North Dakota Re­pub­lic­an who is press­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to ap­prove the con­tro­ver­sial pipeline.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups bat­tling the pro­posed pipeline re­acted crit­ic­ally to the find­ings, in­clud­ing one centered on ERM’s mem­ber­ship in the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute, a power­ful in­dustry lob­by­ing group that sup­ports the pipeline.

The OIG says a State De­part­ment law­yer’s con­clu­sion that this was not a “dis­qual­i­fy­ing” con­flict of in­terest was a “reas­on­able con­clu­sion.” That drew harsh words from the en­vir­on­ment­al group 350.org.

“While al­low­ing a mem­ber of the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute to re­view a tar sands oil pipeline may tech­nic­ally be leg­al, it’s by no means re­spons­ible. Sec­ret­ary [of State] Kerry and Pres­id­ent Obama can let their cli­mate legacies be tarred by this dirty pro­cess or they can do the right thing and re­ject the Key­stone XL pipeline once and for all,” said Jason Kow­al­ski, 350.org’s policy dir­ect­or.

While the re­port is a blow to anti-Key­stone act­iv­ists, it won’t end the in­tense polit­ic­al and lob­by­ing battle over the pipeline that would bring oil from Al­berta’s oil sands to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies.

The pro­ject re­mains un­der State De­part­ment re­view, and the de­part­ment is tak­ing com­ment from the pub­lic and oth­er fed­er­al agen­cies on its fi­nal en­vir­on­ment­al re­view re­leased in late Janu­ary.

The State De­part­ment’s in­spect­or gen­er­al said Wed­nes­day that the de­part­ment fol­lowed in­tern­al guidelines in se­lect­ing the con­tract­or that stud­ied the pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline and that the pro­cess to gauge po­ten­tial con­flicts of in­terest was “ef­fect­ive.”

Key­stone op­pon­ents on Wed­nes­day launched fresh ef­forts to per­suade the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to re­ject the pro­ject.

Demo­crat­ic Sens. Bar­bara Box­er and Shel­don White­house sent Kerry a let­ter Wed­nes­day call­ing for an “im­me­di­ate and com­pre­hens­ive study on the hu­man health im­pacts of tar sands and the pro­posed pipeline” be­fore any fi­nal de­cision.

But an ar­ray of pipeline ad­voc­ates said the in­spect­or gen­er­al re­port on the con­tract­ing pro­cess knocks aside any reas­on for the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to avoid ap­prov­al.

“After more than five years, all the ex­cuses not to build Key­stone XL have been ex­hausted. The state of limbo needs to end,” said Cindy Schild of the Amer­ic­an Pet­ro­leum In­sti­tute.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×