Uncertainty Persists on Key Syria Chemical Deadline

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 27, 2014, 6:31 a.m.

It is un­clear if in­ter­na­tion­al au­thor­it­ies will have to aban­don a June goal for des­troy­ing the Syr­i­an re­gime’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al, the New York Times re­ports.

A new ex­ten­ded timeline re­portedly gives Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s re­gime un­til April 27 to fin­ish mov­ing its chem­ic­al-war­fare stocks to a coastal port for elim­in­a­tion out­side the vi­ol­ence-plagued coun­try. The new sched­ule would rep­res­ent a delay of nearly three months from a Feb. 6 cutoff date, es­tab­lished last year, for the gov­ern­ment in Dam­as­cus to fin­ish pla­cing ma­ter­i­als on Dan­ish and Nor­we­gi­an trans­port ships docked at Latakia.

Of­fi­cials still have not in­dic­ated wheth­er the new sched­ule would re­quire the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to re­think its man­date for the chem­ic­al stock­pile’s full elim­in­a­tion by the middle of this year, the Times re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

As­sad’s gov­ern­ment agreed to re­lin­quish the ar­sen­al weeks after an Au­gust nerve-gas at­tack for which it nev­er ac­cep­ted blame. Syr­i­an of­fi­cials have cited se­cur­ity prob­lems to ex­plain delays in get­ting the ma­ter­i­als to Latakia from points across the di­vided coun­try.

Mi­chael Luhan, a spokes­man for the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons, said “it looks like things are be­ing sor­ted out and that we are be­ing giv­en grounds for be­liev­ing there will be reg­u­lar move­ment now” of the Syr­i­an stocks. The in­ter­na­tion­al watch­dog agency said As­sad’s gov­ern­ment had handed over an ini­tial cache of mus­tard blister agent at Latakia on Wed­nes­day.

Still, en­voys at the United Na­tions said the dis­arm­a­ment pro­ject’s pace may con­tin­ue to pro­duce con­cerns on the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, des­pite Wed­nes­day’s de­vel­op­ment.

“We are not in the realm of non­com­pli­ance yet, but we are get­ting in­creas­ingly rest­less,” said one en­voy tied to the 15-na­tion body.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×