It is unclear if international authorities will have to abandon a June goal for destroying the Syrian regime’s chemical arsenal, the New York Times reports.
A new extended timeline reportedly gives Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime until April 27 to finish moving its chemical-warfare stocks to a coastal port for elimination outside the violence-plagued country. The new schedule would represent a delay of nearly three months from a Feb. 6 cutoff date, established last year, for the government in Damascus to finish placing materials on Danish and Norwegian transport ships docked at Latakia.
Officials still have not indicated whether the new schedule would require the U.N. Security Council to rethink its mandate for the chemical stockpile’s full elimination by the middle of this year, the Times reported on Wednesday.
Assad’s government agreed to relinquish the arsenal weeks after an August nerve-gas attack for which it never accepted blame. Syrian officials have cited security problems to explain delays in getting the materials to Latakia from points across the divided country.
Michael Luhan, a spokesman for the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, said “it looks like things are being sorted out and that we are being given grounds for believing there will be regular movement now” of the Syrian stocks. The international watchdog agency said Assad’s government had handed over an initial cache of mustard blister agent at Latakia on Wednesday.
Still, envoys at the United Nations said the disarmament project’s pace may continue to produce concerns on the Security Council, despite Wednesday’s development.
“We are not in the realm of noncompliance yet, but we are getting increasingly restless,” said one envoy tied to the 15-nation body.
What We're Following See More »
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."
"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.