Murray: Senate Democrats Will Not Do a Budget This Year

The already small number of things Congress plans to do this year just got smaller.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 12: U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) speaks while flanked by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on December 12, 2013 in Washington, DC. Senate Democrats talked about a proposed budget deal and Republicans efforts to block U.S. President Barack Obama's Circuit court nominees
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms
Feb. 28, 2014, 10 a.m.

Just a day after Speak­er John Boehner prom­ised that House Re­pub­lic­ans will pro­duce a budget this year, Sen­ate budget writer Patty Mur­ray an­nounced that her com­mit­tee won’t be join­ing them.

“Fisc­al Year 2015 is settled, the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tees are already work­ing with their bi­par­tis­an spend­ing levels, and now we should work to­geth­er to build on our two-year bi­par­tis­an budget, not cre­ate more un­cer­tainty for fam­il­ies and busi­nesses by im­me­di­ately rel­it­ig­at­ing it,” Mur­ray said in a state­ment provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Es­sen­tially, the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee chair­wo­man is ar­guing that there is no need to do a budget for fisc­al 2015 be­cause Con­gress already has one. The budget agree­ment that Mur­ray con­cocted with Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., and passed both cham­bers in Decem­ber, already set the topline spend­ing level for fisc­al 2015 at $1.014 tril­lion. That’s all ap­pro­pri­at­ors need to pass their spend­ing bills for fund­ing the gov­ern­ment through Oc­to­ber of next year.

Mur­ray did say, however, that she will work with the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee to “lay out our long-term vis­ion for cre­at­ing jobs, boost­ing the eco­nomy, and tack­ling our de­fi­cits fairly and re­spons­ibly.” Those pro­pos­als will al­low Demo­crats to lay out their ideal fin­an­cial vis­ion for the coun­try in an elec­tion year that they plan to struc­ture around in­come in­equal­ity, without hav­ing to make any of the tough choices that go in­to a bi­par­tis­an budget agree­ment that ac­tu­ally would stand a chance of passing in both cham­bers.

Those con­cerns are shared by some House Re­pub­lic­ans, who are en­cour­aging Ry­an not to pro­duce a budget either, lest his 2015 pro­pos­als de­tract from their elec­tion-year ar­gu­ments on the Af­ford­able Care Act and job cre­ation.

Sen­ate Demo­crats also warn that the dif­fer­ence in topline fig­ures between the cur­rent fisc­al year and the next is a mere $2 bil­lion (noth­ing in the con­text of a massive fed­er­al spend­ing bill), leav­ing Ry­an little room to make sweep­ing changes to fed­er­al spend­ing. Ry­an would have to break open his agree­ment with Mur­ray in or­der to make a real im­pact, some ar­gue.

“They just want to re­open the FY15 budget so they can hi­jack the pro­cess to play polit­ics and use a vote-a-rama for par­tis­an and cam­paign-re­lated show-votes. If Re­pub­lic­ans truly want to work with Demo­crats to build on the two-year bi­par­tis­an budget, that can hap­pen without re­do­ing a form­al pro­cess for a budget that is already done,” a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aide said.

But the House ma­jor­ity is in a slightly dif­fer­ent po­s­i­tion than their col­leagues in the oth­er cham­ber. Sen­ate Demo­crats don’t have a “No Budget, No Pay” prom­ise to con­tend with. Some mem­bers worry that the deal could make House Re­pub­lic­ans look hy­po­crit­ic­al if they don’t pro­duce a sep­ar­ate fisc­al 2015 budget, des­pite the Ry­an-Mur­ray agree­ment.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
15 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×