Murray: Senate Democrats Will Not Do a Budget This Year

The already small number of things Congress plans to do this year just got smaller.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 12: U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) speaks while flanked by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on December 12, 2013 in Washington, DC. Senate Democrats talked about a proposed budget deal and Republicans efforts to block U.S. President Barack Obama's Circuit court nominees
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms
Feb. 28, 2014, 10 a.m.

Just a day after Speak­er John Boehner prom­ised that House Re­pub­lic­ans will pro­duce a budget this year, Sen­ate budget writer Patty Mur­ray an­nounced that her com­mit­tee won’t be join­ing them.

“Fisc­al Year 2015 is settled, the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tees are already work­ing with their bi­par­tis­an spend­ing levels, and now we should work to­geth­er to build on our two-year bi­par­tis­an budget, not cre­ate more un­cer­tainty for fam­il­ies and busi­nesses by im­me­di­ately rel­it­ig­at­ing it,” Mur­ray said in a state­ment provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

Es­sen­tially, the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee chair­wo­man is ar­guing that there is no need to do a budget for fisc­al 2015 be­cause Con­gress already has one. The budget agree­ment that Mur­ray con­cocted with Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., and passed both cham­bers in Decem­ber, already set the topline spend­ing level for fisc­al 2015 at $1.014 tril­lion. That’s all ap­pro­pri­at­ors need to pass their spend­ing bills for fund­ing the gov­ern­ment through Oc­to­ber of next year.

Mur­ray did say, however, that she will work with the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee to “lay out our long-term vis­ion for cre­at­ing jobs, boost­ing the eco­nomy, and tack­ling our de­fi­cits fairly and re­spons­ibly.” Those pro­pos­als will al­low Demo­crats to lay out their ideal fin­an­cial vis­ion for the coun­try in an elec­tion year that they plan to struc­ture around in­come in­equal­ity, without hav­ing to make any of the tough choices that go in­to a bi­par­tis­an budget agree­ment that ac­tu­ally would stand a chance of passing in both cham­bers.

Those con­cerns are shared by some House Re­pub­lic­ans, who are en­cour­aging Ry­an not to pro­duce a budget either, lest his 2015 pro­pos­als de­tract from their elec­tion-year ar­gu­ments on the Af­ford­able Care Act and job cre­ation.

Sen­ate Demo­crats also warn that the dif­fer­ence in topline fig­ures between the cur­rent fisc­al year and the next is a mere $2 bil­lion (noth­ing in the con­text of a massive fed­er­al spend­ing bill), leav­ing Ry­an little room to make sweep­ing changes to fed­er­al spend­ing. Ry­an would have to break open his agree­ment with Mur­ray in or­der to make a real im­pact, some ar­gue.

“They just want to re­open the FY15 budget so they can hi­jack the pro­cess to play polit­ics and use a vote-a-rama for par­tis­an and cam­paign-re­lated show-votes. If Re­pub­lic­ans truly want to work with Demo­crats to build on the two-year bi­par­tis­an budget, that can hap­pen without re­do­ing a form­al pro­cess for a budget that is already done,” a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aide said.

But the House ma­jor­ity is in a slightly dif­fer­ent po­s­i­tion than their col­leagues in the oth­er cham­ber. Sen­ate Demo­crats don’t have a “No Budget, No Pay” prom­ise to con­tend with. Some mem­bers worry that the deal could make House Re­pub­lic­ans look hy­po­crit­ic­al if they don’t pro­duce a sep­ar­ate fisc­al 2015 budget, des­pite the Ry­an-Mur­ray agree­ment.

What We're Following See More »
Johnson on Ballot Everywhere, Followed by Stein, McMullin
1 hours ago
Is McMullin Building the GOP in Exile?
2 hours ago

Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."

Clinton Up 9 in USA Today Poll; Up 3 According to Fox
2 hours ago

A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll finds Clinton leads Trump by 9 points nationwide, 47% to 38%. A Fox News national poll has Clinton up just three points, 44% to 41% over Trump.

Too Many Potential Enrollees Paying Obamacare Penalties Instead
4 hours ago

One of the main reasons for the recent Obamacare premium hikes is that many potential enrollees have simply decided to pay the tax penalty for remaining uninsured, rather than pay for insurance. More than 8 million people paid the penalty in 2014, and preliminary numbers for 2015 suggest that the number approaches 6 million. "For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles."

Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
5 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.