Sen. Lisa Murkowski says history is on her side as she presses the Obama administration to relax restrictions on U.S. crude-oil exports.
The Alaska Republican, in a report issued Monday, catalogues cases in which Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Clinton allowed some exports despite the general U.S. prohibition imposed after the 1970s Arab oil embargo.
“The historical record is clear that the executive branch retains the authority to permit crude oil exports under certain conditions,” the report states.
“Even statutes that generally prohibit the export of crude oil contain provisions that permit the president to authorize exports under certain conditions,” it adds.
Murkowski, the top Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, issued the report ahead of her Monday afternoon speech at the big IHS CERAWeek energy conference in Houston.
In January, she began calling on President Obama to relax limits on crude-oil exports.
But that effort faces pushback from some Democrats.
In a letter to Obama in late January, Democratic Sens. Edward Markey and Robert Menendez challenged the idea that federal officials have statutory leeway to relax current policies that only enable exports in limited circumstances.
And Monday, the environmental group Oil Change International issued a report that concludes that allowing major U.S. oil exports would worsen climate change.
“Allowing U.S. crude oil exports will result in increased profits that will in turn result in increased oil production,” the report states, arguing that producers would benefit from higher prices they can fetch in markets outside the U.S.
“While the exact amount of increased production is dependent on a variety of factors in the oil market, this analysis demonstrates that the average projected increase in oil production caused by removing the export ban would release the equivalent of the lifetime CO2 emissions from 42 coal plants,” the Oil Change International report states.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."