The Obama administration said Wednesday that insurers can wait until 2016 before canceling plans that don’t comply with Obamacare.
The administration released a host of final regulations that, among other things, ease reporting requirements for businesses and allow insurers to keep selling individual policies that don’t meet the law’s requirements. Those plans, which the White House first uncanceled in November, can now last until 2016 or, in some cases, 2017.
Amid an uproar from congressional Democrats, President Obama first announced in November that he would let states and insurers decide whether they wanted to uncancel plans that don’t cover everything the Affordable Care Act requires. But that one-year transition set up another round of cancellation notices for this October — just before the midterm elections.
Under the additional extension announced Wednesday, those cancellation notices will come in October 2016, although plans that offer early renewals could be extended into 2017. The administration doesn’t expect many people to be affected at that point.
Administration offiials denied any political motivation for the latest delay, though press materials about the changes specifically name-checked Democratic senators who are up for reelection this year and have pushed for Obamacare changes — including Mary Landrieu, Jeanne Shaheen, Mark Udall, and Mark Warner.
Senior administration officials estimate that about 1.5 million people are currently covered by plans that would have otherwise been canceled. That number will likely shrink even more by the time the latest extension ends, as people get employer-based insurance, become eligible for Medicare, or simply choose to buy a different policy, potentially with help from Obamacare’s new tax subsidies. So officials don’t expect to see a big, politically damaging wave of cancellation notices in 2016.
Uncanceling pre-Obamacare plans has a small but negative impact on the law’s insurance exchanges, the new marketplaces where individuals who buy insurance on their own can shop for coverage.
The people most likely to hang on to a plan that doesn’t meet all ACA requirements, rather than switching to an Obamacare-compliant policy, are typically healthy and reasonably affluent. Allowing those consumers to stay out of the exchanges carries some risk of higher premiums next year if those inside the new marketplaces are sicker than expected.
The health care law includes a built-in safety mechanism for that scenario, but the White House also announced new constraints on that program Wednesday.
The administration said it won’t allow the government to lose money on the law’s risk corridors — a program Republicans have criticized as a “bailout for insurance companies.”
In the risk-corridors program, insurers with a better-than-expected risk pool pay into a fund, and insurers with a worse-than-expected experience can draw down from that fund. Theoretically, if everyone’s experience is worse than expected, the fund wouldn’t have enough money and the government would pick up the difference. But the administration said it wouldn’t allow that to happen — the money that goes out will match the money that comes in, officials said.
The new rules also formalize a delay in next year’s open-enrollment window and extend that window by a month. Enrollment will begin Nov. 15 and run through Feb. 15. The delays push the beginning of the enrollment window — when people will get a look at their premiums — past the November midterms, and the extended window gives the administration more time to try to bring in more people.
The open-enrollment delay also gives insurers more time to figure out their rates. Without it, they would have had to set their 2015 premiums quickly after the end of the current enrollment window, meaning they might not have had a full accounting of how many young, healthy people signed up at the last minute.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.