Your CPAC Viewing Guide: 6 Story Lines to Watch

Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Chris Christie, Rick Santorum. Even Rick Perry. Can a 2016 junkie ask for anything more?

Washington DC, Feb 18. General view of the CPAC 2010 conference in Washington DC. (Newscom TagID: ptsphotoshot290683)     [Photo via Newscom]
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Add to Briefcase
Shane Goldmacher
March 5, 2014, 4:27 p.m.

Thou­sands of con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ists des­cend on Wash­ing­ton this week for the an­nu­al Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence. The gath­er­ing is an op­por­tun­ity for rising GOP politi­cians to pol­ish their tea-party cre­den­tials and for new faces to emerge.

Here are the storylines to watch:

Has Marco Ru­bio turned the corner on im­mig­ra­tion?

Marco Ru­bio, once a darling of the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment, fell out of fa­vor in 2013 as he pushed a com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion bill through the Sen­ate that in­cluded a path to leg­al­iz­a­tion. Ever since, he’s been try­ing to re­hab­il­it­ate his repu­ta­tion with the con­ser­vat­ive grass roots that vaul­ted him onto the na­tion­al stage. He’s won back the hawk­ish wing of the party with his firm stands on for­eign policy. He’s cour­ted the donor class be­hind closed doors. But the sen­at­or’s Thursday lunch­time speech to CPAC will be his most pub­lic test yet of wheth­er he’s turned the corner among the tea-party base.

What kind of re­cep­tion does Mitch Mc­Con­nell get?

It’s get­ting harder and harder these days to keep track of which con­ser­vat­ive groups are try­ing to get rid of which con­gres­sion­al lead­er. The Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund and Freedom­Works are both try­ing to oust Mitch Mc­Con­nell. Those same groups are push­ing to fire John Boehner as speak­er, as is the Tea Party Pat­ri­ots. Boehner isn’t ven­tur­ing in­to the li­on’s den of CPAC this year. But Mc­Con­nell, who faces a con­tested primary against busi­ness­man Matt Bev­in, will be there on Thursday. He speaks after a pan­el titled “Does the U.S. Con­gress Mat­ter Any­more? Ex­ec­ut­ive Or­ders AND the Hope­less­ness of EVER Cur­tail­ing Fed­er­al Spend­ing.” Mc­Con­nell is a core mem­ber of the GOP lead­er­ship and the ob­ject of dis­ap­point­ment for a com­prom­ise-weary base. Mc­Con­nell isn’t an elec­tri­fy­ing speak­er but he can dish polit­ic­al red meat with the best of them. Will it be enough to hold the boo-birds at bay?

Do the for­eign policy hawks or doves take flight?

The fact that the 2014 CPAC oc­curs amid an in­ter­na­tion­al stan­doff over Rus­sia’s in­cur­sion in­to Crimea will high­light the di­vi­sion in­side the Re­pub­lic­an Party over Amer­ica’s pos­ture abroad. On one side is the liber­tari­an, non­in­ter­ven­tion­ist wing led by Sen. Rand Paul, who told The Wash­ing­ton Post this week, “Some on our side are so stuck in the Cold War era that they want to tweak Rus­sia all the time and I don’t think that is a good idea.” On the oth­er is the tra­di­tion­al, hawk­ish wing of the party that ar­gues for strong stands abroad. The fas­cin­at­ing ideo­lo­gic­al de­bate will play out on stage and throughout the halls.

Can Chris Christie put Su­per­storm Sandy be­hind him?

Gov. Chris Christie wasn’t in­vited to CPAC in 2013. Not after he ap­peared along­side Pres­id­ent Obama only days be­fore the 2012 elec­tion in a scene that helped make Obama look pres­id­en­tial. The bi­par­tis­an tour­ing of New Jer­sey sites dam­aged by Sandy deeply irked Re­pub­lic­an act­iv­ists across the coun­try who watched as Mitt Rom­ney’s shot at the White House fizzled. But a year later, Christie has come un­der fire from Demo­crats (and Jer­sey res­id­ents) for his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s traffic-snarling scan­dal — and Re­pub­lic­ans have closed ranks. As former Obama ad­viser Dav­id Axel­rod put it on MS­N­BC, “Right-wing Re­pub­lic­ans are latch­ing on to him a little bit be­cause they think that he’s be­ing per­se­cuted.” CPAC at­tendees won’t ever be Christie’s base, but if he wants to be the 2016 nom­in­ee he needs them not to view him as a party pari­ah.

Who wins the straw poll?

No, the win­ner of the 2014 CPAC straw poll is not a shoo-in as the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee. The last two win­ners in the midterm years be­fore a pres­id­en­tial primary were Sen. George Al­len (2006) and Rep. Ron Paul (2010) — and you saw how much good that did them. Still, the ex­er­cise does demon­strate a cer­tain de­gree of grass­roots ex­cite­ment, or at least or­gan­iz­a­tion­al muscle. Sen. Rand Paul car­ried the day in 2013 and in fact a Paul (Ron or Rand) or Rom­ney has fin­ished atop the straw poll in every year since 2007. Will 2014 bring new blood?

Does a new (or old) star emerge for 2016?

Rick Perry entered the 2012 pres­id­en­tial race last and to great fan­fare, only to flame out months later. He’s back, quietly lay­ing the ground­work for an­oth­er po­ten­tial run in 2016 and will be one of a trio of failed 2012ers, along with Newt Gin­grich and Rick San­tor­um, to ad­dress the CPAC crowd. All three, but es­pe­cially Perry and San­tor­um, are out to prove they are still rel­ev­ant and not re­treads. But they must fend off all the re­l­at­ively fresh faces of the party — Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Marco Ru­bio in the Sen­ate and a hand­ful of GOP gov­ernors across the coun­try. CPAC is where most of them will fo­cus on woo­ing the act­iv­ists that com­prise the back­bone of any na­tion­al cam­paign.

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
17 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login