Increasingly anxious about the prospect of a difficult election year, Democratic candidates are already starting to take refuge in one of the party’s most tried-and-true issues: Social Security.
It’s happening in Arkansas, where Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor has deployed a blitz of TV ads to accuse his opponent, GOP Rep. Tom Cotton, of plotting to cut, privatize, and undermine the popular entitlement program. House Majority PAC, a super PAC that helps Democratic House candidates, has similarly taken to the airwaves to argue that Republican candidates want to effectively get rid of it.
And in Florida, where the parties face off in a special House election next week, Social Security has been the Democrats’ go-to attack against Republican David Jolly. “I don’t think it’s right for David Jolly to risk Social Security money in the stock market,” said one negative ad, featuring an elderly couple talking into the camera.
The attacks are the first glimpses of an issue the party will push to the forefront of the 2014 elections, according to Democratic strategists. With candidates battered by Obamacare’s deepening unpopularity, Social Security represents one of their surest bets of putting Republicans on the defensive in a year when the GOP otherwise plans to play a lot of offense.
“Social Security remains a potent an issue for Democrats,” said Jef Pollock, a Democratic strategist. “In multiple national polls, data shows that voters believe that the Democrats are better able to protect Social Security going forward, and have also seen ample evidence about the reckless approach that most GOPers have taken to privatizing the system — something that is a real negative for any GOP candidate.”
The question is whether this amounts to smart strategy or a desperate play from a party with nowhere else to turn. The last great Democratic hope for political success — the GOP’s support for Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan to voucherize Medicare for future beneficiaries — failed to deliver the sweeping congressional victories Democrats had promised. And the issue hardly addresses the election’s current topic du jour, the troubled implementation of Obamacare.
“The national environment for Democrats is terrible, so they’re looking for any specific things they can, grasping at straws,” said Keith Emis, a pollster for Cotton. “The election is about Obamcare, and they want it to be about something else.”
As a political issue, Social Security has laid relatively dormant in recent years, supplanted by a fierce debate over health care, Medicare, and Obamacare. President Obama largely sidestepped it during his last presidential campaign, instead striking a conciliatory note that the two parties should be able to negotiate over the program’s future.
It flared briefly last year, when discussions began over implementing the “chained CPI,” a proposal that would have effectively cut payouts to beneficiaries. The plan from Obama angered progressive Democrats who considered the policy and politics wrongheaded, and even the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, Greg Walden, warned his fellow Republicans about the proposal’s political consequences.
But it makes sense that some Democratic candidates would, along with continued attacks on Medicare, dust off the line of criticism now. It’s dictated in part by the real estate of the 2014 election: Most of this year’s competitive House and Senate races — such as those in Arkansas or Louisiana — are in conservative, older, and whiter states. In places like those, Social Security is one of the few issues where the Democratic agenda remains well-liked among voters. Polls show that seniors, even those who are Republican, have a deep aversion to cutting the program even if it would help the country’s deficit.
“You’ll see Medicare and Social Security right at the forefront of the contrast we’re drawing between ourselves and our opponent,” said Erik Dorey, spokesman for Pryor’s campaign.
The senator’s campaign says its attacks against Cotton have resonance because the freshman House member voted for a budget last year that supported raising the retirement programs’ eligibility age. Other Republicans, however, point out that it’s hardly a front-burner issue in Washington or elsewhere. While Obamacare is driven into the public consciousness by countless news stories about its foibles, delays, and broken promises, nothing makes Social Security similarly relevant in 2014.
“I think there’s nothing to push back against; it’s not an issue,” said Peter Feaman, a Republican National Committee member from Florida, who’s watching his state’s special-election race closely. “It’s made up out of whole cloth. Point to some bill somewhere that’s talking about reducing benefits for Social Security recipients — it’s not there, at all.”
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.
"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."