NRA’s Wayne LaPierre Takes a Victory Lap

Pundits called him and his movement dead after he said incendiary things post-Sandy Hook. They were wrong.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
March 6, 2014, 11:29 a.m.

It’s been a while since we heard from Wayne LaPierre. The last time the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation lead­er made head­lines, a ram­page shoot­er had killed 26 chil­dren in Con­necti­c­ut and he was the guy to come out for more guns in schools and great­er re­stric­tions on “¦ video games. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” LaPierre said at the time. The me­dia ri­diculed him, deem­ing his speech tone-deaf, in­ef­fect­ive, out-of-touch, and a fail­ure.

“If there’s any­thing to take away from this press con­fer­ence,” The Amer­ic­an Pro­spect wrote then, “it’s that politi­cians should not be afraid of the NRA. Its mys­tique is gone.” Later, in a cov­er story titled “This Is How the NRA Ends,” The New Re­pub­lic would ar­gue that the con­ver­sa­tions fol­low­ing Sandy Hook were “not the end of hopes for gun re­form, but the be­gin­ning.”

A year later, after gun con­trol failed loudly in Con­gress in 2013, it’s pretty clear they were wrong. And not just a little wrong: spec­tac­u­larly wrong.

In his speech at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence on Thursday, LaPierre en­joyed rub­bing that very thing in the me­dia’s col­lect­ive face. After cit­ing their off-base cov­er­age of his speech in the wake of Sandy Hook, he con­tin­ued to mount a lar­ger at­tack.

“One of Amer­ica’s greatest threats is a na­tion­al news me­dia that fails to provide a level play­ing field for the truth,” LaPierre told a packed room. “Now it’s all en­ter­tain­ment rat­ings, per­son­al celebrity, the next sen­sa­tion­al story, and the de­lib­er­ate spin­ning and pur­pose­ful use of words and lan­guage, truth be damned, to ad­vance their agenda.”

He went on to link his hatred of the me­dia to his dis­taste for politi­cians, ar­guing the two have joined forces to “mis­in­form and de­ceive” the Amer­ic­an pub­lic, a sen­ti­ment which earned him mild ap­plause. “They lie bills in­to law, they pass le­gis­la­tion they haven’t even read … health care policies, eco­nom­ic policies, for­eign af­fairs — all seem re­peatedly reck­less,” he fumed. “The IRS is now a weapon to pun­ish any­one who dis­agrees with them, and that means every one of you.”

The way LaPierre de­scribed things, everything was “us” versus “them.” It was all politi­cians and the me­dia versus or­din­ary Amer­ic­ans and, as we learned later, their guns.

“We don’t trust gov­ern­ment be­cause gov­ern­ment it­self has proved un­worthy of our trust. We trust ourselves,” he said. “We trust our free­dom.”

LaPierre’s speech came mere hours after Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell sought to win con­ser­vat­ive hearts by walk­ing on­stage with a rifle in hand. He im­me­di­ately passed the gun off to Sen. Tom Coburn of Ok­lahoma, but no mat­ter. The gim­mick worked. It was the only time that the audi­ence cheered loudly dur­ing Mc­Con­nell’s en­tire time on stage.

That en­thu­si­asm was on dis­play again for LaPierre’s speech as he fired up the crowd, ask­ing the audi­ence wheth­er they trust the gov­ern­ment to pro­tect them. (The an­swer: a re­sound­ing “No!”)

In a fi­nal in­sult to the me­dia’s cov­er­age of his Sandy Hook speech, he re­peated the quote that made him in­fam­ous in the wake of the New­town shoot­ing: “The surest way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” he said.

And the audi­ence loved it.

The NRA, LaPierre con­tin­ued, proudly stands for the Amer­ica we all want, “un­flinch­ing in de­fense of one uni­fy­ing prin­ciple: in­di­vidu­al free­dom for all.”

The crowd was on its feet now, clap­ping and cheer­ing as LaPierre’s speech seemed to veer in­to the strange ter­rit­ory of the free­dom-lov­ing speech Bill Pull­man gives as Pres­id­ent Thomas Whit­more in In­de­pend­ence Day, tak­ing on an al­most post-apo­ca­lyptic qual­ity.

“The NRA will not go quietly in­to the night,” he cried. “We will fight. I prom­ise you that.”

He walked off stage as Dav­id Guetta’s “Ti­tani­um” played.

Ri­co­chet, you take your aim. Fire away, fire away. You shoot me down but I won’t fall. I am ti­tani­um.

 

 

What We're Following See More »
ABSENT FROM LIST: GENNIFER FLOWERS
Most Trump Guests Have Military Ties
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
TOP OF MIND
Trending on Google: ‘Why Should Trump Not Be President’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
WHO PLAYED THE DONALD?
Longtime Clinton Aide Played Trump in Mock Debates
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.

Source:
WEEKEND POLLING ROUNDUP
New Polls Still Show Razor-Thin Margins
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
  • A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
  • A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
  • A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
  • A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
THE QUESTION
How Many Times Has the Trump Campaign Emailed Ted Cruz’s Supporters?
5 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."

Source:
×