HOUSTON — Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy on Thursday declined to say whether the agency would launch a rulemaking to set carbon-emissions standards for refineries.
“We are simply focused right now on the power-plant rule,” McCarthy said, referring to an upcoming proposal to set standards for the nation’s power plants.
The fate of plans to eventually craft climate-change rules for the nation’s refineries, a smaller emissions source than power plants, has been a question mark for years.
EPA, in a 2010 legal agreement with several states and environmental groups, said it would write a refinery regulation, but it hasn’t come to pass.
McCarthy, speaking to reporters at a major energy conference here, did not rule out launching an effort to set carbon-emissions standards for other stationary pollution sources beyond power plants.
“We are talking to all kinds of folks about what that [the power-plant rule] might mean for other stationary sources, but frankly this [the power-plant rule] is where my focus is and will be,” she told reporters at the IHS CERAWeek conference.
Pressed on the topic, McCarthy said: “We are in litigation discussions and clearly that is not something I am going to be talking about today.”
“But we recognize and I think folks recognize that this [power-plant] rule is a very important one. This is where my attention is going to be. That doesn’t mean that we won’t continue discussions with the litigants. We certainly will,” she added.
Refineries are the second-largest stationary source of U.S. carbon emissions.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.