Has the Conservative Base Given Up on Gay Marriage?

What the scant mention of gay marriage at CPAC means.

Pro-traditional marriage supporters protest next to gay marriage supporters in front of the U.S. Federal Courthouse March 3, 2014 in Detroit, Michigan.
National Journal
Elahe Izad
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izad
March 7, 2014, 3:05 a.m.

It’s barely been a week since Ari­zona Gov. Jan Brew­er ve­toed a bill al­low­ing busi­nesses to re­fuse ser­vice to gay cus­tom­ers due to re­li­gious be­liefs.

You will not find a fired-up, con­ser­vat­ive back­lash at CPAC, the massive gath­er­ing of con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ists. And, in par­tic­u­lar, you won’t en­counter people cheer­ing over how to fight the latest state ac­tions ex­pand­ing gay mar­riage.

Mar­quee speak­ers dur­ing the first day of the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence avoided the top­ic of gay rights, or al­luded to it by men­tion­ing things like Duck Dyn­asty, Chick-fil-A, and re­li­gious free­dom. That’s a con­trast from 2013, when a num­ber of speak­ers men­tioned their be­liefs in more ex­pli­cit terms. Marco Ru­bio of 2013 said, “Just be­cause I be­lieve that states should have the right to define mar­riage in a tra­di­tion­al way does not make me a big­ot.” Marco Ru­bio in 2014 spoke largely of for­eign policy and the Amer­ic­an Dream.

Gay mar­riage could still come up at CPAC, but its not tak­ing cen­ter stage thus far doesn’t mean that con­ser­vat­ives don’t largely op­pose same-sex mar­riage. Ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Wash­ing­ton Post/ABC News poll, 67 per­cent of self-identi­fy­ing con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­ans op­pose gay mar­riage; 53 per­cent strongly op­pose it.

But it’s hard to say how that “strong op­pos­i­tion” trans­lates in­to ac­tion. You can speak with CPAC at­tendees to get an idea of how act­iv­ists feel about their party’s dis­course on gay mar­riage, but even that is an im­per­fect meas­ure. A num­ber said they per­son­ally do not en­dorse same-sex mar­riage, but don’t want the GOP to fo­cus on the is­sue, call­ing it a dis­trac­tion. Oth­ers, par­tic­u­larly young­er voters, voiced sup­port for gay mar­riage while say­ing it’s a states-rights is­sue.

And 65 per­cent of CPAC at­tendees are un­der 25, which can help ex­plain why the is­sue hasn’t come to the fore. “I think the gap is not so much polit­ic­al; it’s be­com­ing more of a gen­er­a­tion­al gap,” says Daniel Berg­man, a 20-year-old at­tendee from New York who sup­ports gay mar­riage.

“There are is­sues that af­fect the en­tire coun­try, and gay mar­riage right now is used as a wedge is­sue for the youth vote,” says Mi­chael Christ, a 20-year-old from Flor­ida.

One sign of chan­ging at­ti­tudes is the semi-in­clu­sion in CPAC of gay-rights group GO­Proud. After years of be­ing of­fi­cially ex­cluded, mem­bers of the group have of­fi­cially been in­vited as guests. But they aren’t spon­sors with a booth, nor are they host­ing a pan­el. The agree­ment between the two parties is de­lib­er­ately low-key.

Con­versely, the Na­tion­al Or­gan­iz­a­tion for Mar­riage does have a booth at CPAC, and a num­ber of at­tendees per­used its ma­ter­i­als on the first day of the con­fer­ence, and helped them­selves to the swag they offered. But the group isn’t in­volved with a tra­di­tion­al-mar­riage pan­el be­cause, well, there isn’t one. And that has in­spired an out­cry from some con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ists, up­set that CPAC hasn’t ded­ic­ated ses­sions to abor­tion and mar­riage is­sues. Maybe the big back­lash isn’t at CPAC be­cause those who would or­gan­ize it just aren’t there.

What We're Following See More »
APPEALS COURT RULED TRUMP EXCEEDED HIS AUTHORITY
Supreme Court Takes Up Trump Travel Ban
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.

Source:
FACES STIFF OPPOSITION FROM BOTH PARTIES
Trump Proposes 95 Percent Cut To Office of Drug Control Budget
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.

Source:
HOPES A DEAL CAN GET DONE
Schumer Meeting with Trump for Last-Ditch Meeting
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
BLURRY LINE BETWEEN BUSINESS/PRESIDENCY
New CREW Report Identifies 500 Conflicts of Interest in Trump’s First Year
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.

Source:
BY SCALISE
House Told to “Stay Flexible”
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login