A new poll shows that about two-thirds of U.S. adults believe the Obama administration should approve the Keystone XL pipeline.
The Washington Post/ABC News poll released Friday finds 65 percent support for the project, while 22 percent of adults polled oppose it and 13 percent had no opinion.
Forty-seven percent of respondents believe the project would pose a “significant” risk to the environment, and 85 percent say it would create a “significant” number of jobs.
Democrats are split on the pipeline to bring oil sands crude from Alberta, Canada, to Gulf Coast refineries; there’s heavy Republican support for it, and a clear majority of independents back the project too.
The poll conducted in late February and early March shows that 51 percent of Democrats back Keystone, compared with 82 percent of Republicans and 65 percent of independents.
The overall support level — 65 percent — is consistent with several Pew Research Center polls conducted in 2013, while somewhat higher than the 59 percent support in a mid-2012 Washington Post poll.
The new polling arrives as the Obama administration is getting closer to a decision on TransCanada’s proposed pipeline.
A largely favorable State Department environmental analysis released in late January touched off a 90-day period of input from other federal agencies as State weighs whether the project is in the “national interest.”
But there’s no deadline for a final decision from Secretary of State John Kerry and the White House.
The Post/ABC News poll’s overall margin of error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."
"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."
Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."