Poll Finds Public Support for Building Keystone XL Pipeline

Keystone Pipeline
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
March 7, 2014, 2:33 a.m.

A new poll shows that about two-thirds of U.S. adults be­lieve the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion should ap­prove the Key­stone XL pipeline.

The Wash­ing­ton Post/ABC News poll re­leased Fri­day finds 65 per­cent sup­port for the pro­ject, while 22 per­cent of adults polled op­pose it and 13 per­cent had no opin­ion.

Forty-sev­en per­cent of re­spond­ents be­lieve the pro­ject would pose a “sig­ni­fic­ant” risk to the en­vir­on­ment, and 85 per­cent say it would cre­ate a “sig­ni­fic­ant” num­ber of jobs.

Demo­crats are split on the pipeline to bring oil sands crude from Al­berta, Canada, to Gulf Coast re­finer­ies; there’s heavy Re­pub­lic­an sup­port for it, and a clear ma­jor­ity of in­de­pend­ents back the pro­ject too.

The poll con­duc­ted in late Feb­ru­ary and early March shows that 51 per­cent of Demo­crats back Key­stone, com­pared with 82 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans and 65 per­cent of in­de­pend­ents.

The over­all sup­port level — 65 per­cent — is con­sist­ent with sev­er­al Pew Re­search Cen­ter polls con­duc­ted in 2013, while some­what high­er than the 59 per­cent sup­port in a mid-2012 Wash­ing­ton Post poll.

The new polling ar­rives as the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is get­ting closer to a de­cision on Tran­sCanada’s pro­posed pipeline.

A largely fa­vor­able State De­part­ment en­vir­on­ment­al ana­lys­is re­leased in late Janu­ary touched off a 90-day peri­od of in­put from oth­er fed­er­al agen­cies as State weighs wheth­er the pro­ject is in the “na­tion­al in­terest.”

But there’s no dead­line for a fi­nal de­cision from Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry and the White House.

The Post/ABC News poll’s over­all mar­gin of er­ror was plus or minus 3.5 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
39 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HAD SOUGHT INFO ON LOBBYISTS IN ADMINISTRATION
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Source:
NIKKI HALEY HEADING FOR ANKARA
Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
THOMAS JOINS COURT’S LIBERALS
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

Source:
UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login