When the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 2013, it invalidated one of the most important and successful civil rights laws of the past 50 years. Civil Rights leaders fought in the 1960s to afford not just African Americans, but all Americans the right to vote without discrimination. When the court ruled that Section 4 was unconstitutional, African Americans and other minority groups, such as the nation’s growing Latino population, lost critical protections.
Across the country, Latinos already comprise the nation’s second largest population group. Imagine the electoral potential if all 23.5 million Latino citizens of voting-age were registered and voted. Latinos have the ability to be a decisive force in state and local elections across the nation.
It is precisely because of this potential that some states, counties, and towns have unfairly targeted Latino voters by changing voting practices and policies, district lines, and even voting times in the months since the Supreme Court’s decision.
Just recently in Pasadena, Texas, where Latinos make up about one-third of voters, city officials altered the makeup of the city council. Pasadena’s governing body was transformed from one made up of eight separate city council districts each representing a distinct part of the city and group of voters, to one with six separate districts and two city-wide seats.
The move effectively reduced Latino voting power in city council elections. At-large elections typically dilute Latino voting influence because Latino voters often comprise a far smaller group of voters in a city-wide race than they would in a single district. By converting two single-member city council districts into city-wide seats for which candidates must compete for voters all over town, Pasadena effectively turned back the clock on Latino voter influence. The city did so with impunity.
Make no mistake—minority voting rights around the country are imperiled. That’s why all voters, including Latinos, deserve a modern, effective VRA.
One of the goals of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) is to strengthen American democracy by promoting the full participation of Latinos in civic life. And one of the best ways to do this is to ensure that all citizens are given free and fair access to the ballot box.
In January, a bipartisan group in Congress introduced a bill that would modernize the VRA to make it more relevant, flexible, and effective. NALEO supports this process, because this bill would institute commonsense safeguards to ensure that all U.S. citizens, regardless of race or language, are able to fully exercise their fundamental right to participate in elections. The bill includes enhanced transparency provisions so that subtle changes with the potential to significantly affect voters no longer fly below the radar. This includes, for example, changes in the number of poll workers and other voting resources assigned to particular precincts, a likely contributing factor to long lines encountered by Latino voters during the 2012 elections.
This is a critical step in ensuring that America’s Latino population is able to enjoy the constitutional right to vote — now and in the years to come. Still, there is room for improvement. We are hopeful that, through a deliberative and open bipartisan process, additional protections for Latinos and other minority voters will be included. Groups like NALEO would like to see the necessary committees consider the issue soon, a critical step before a bill could go to the House or Senate floor for a vote.
It’s essential that we have the tools provided by a modern, effective VRA to address the current discriminatory practices that threaten the rights of Latinos and others to vote and to shape this country. Protecting the right to vote isn’t a partisan issue and it isn’t about who wins or loses elections. It’s about common sense steps that will guard the right of everyone to vote, no matter their race, where they live, or what language they speak.
Let’s ensure the promise of America’s democracy remains a reality for all.
Arturo Vargas is the Executive Director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO), the leadership organization of the nation’s more than 6,000 Latino elected and appointed officials.
HAVE AN OPINION ON POLICY AND CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS? The Next America welcomes op-ed pieces that explore the political, economic and social impacts of the profound racial and cultural changes facing our nation, particularly relevant to education, economy, the workforce and health. Email us. Please follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.
"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."