Opinion

Giving Latino Voters the Protections They Deserve

In the absence of a modern Voting Rights Act, states and localities are trying to put limits on Latino political power.

Arturo Vargas is the executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials
National Journal
Arturo Vargas
Add to Briefcase
Arturo Vargas
March 12, 2014, 5:30 a.m.

When the Su­preme Court struck down Sec­tion 4 of the Vot­ing Rights Act (VRA) in 2013, it in­val­id­ated one of the most im­port­ant and suc­cess­ful civil rights laws of the past 50 years. Civil Rights lead­ers fought in the 1960s to af­ford not just Afric­an Amer­ic­ans, but all Amer­ic­ans the right to vote without dis­crim­in­a­tion. When the court ruled that Sec­tion 4 was un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, Afric­an Amer­ic­ans and oth­er minor­ity groups, such as the na­tion’s grow­ing Latino pop­u­la­tion, lost crit­ic­al pro­tec­tions.

Across the coun­try, Lati­nos already com­prise the na­tion’s second largest pop­u­la­tion group. Ima­gine the elect­or­al po­ten­tial if all 23.5 mil­lion Latino cit­izens of vot­ing-age were re­gistered and voted. Lati­nos have the abil­ity to be a de­cis­ive force in state and loc­al elec­tions across the na­tion.

It is pre­cisely be­cause of this po­ten­tial that some states, counties, and towns have un­fairly tar­geted Latino voters by chan­ging vot­ing prac­tices and policies, dis­trict lines, and even vot­ing times in the months since the Su­preme Court’s de­cision.

Just re­cently in Pas­adena, Texas, where Lati­nos make up about one-third of voters, city of­fi­cials altered the makeup of the city coun­cil. Pas­adena’s gov­ern­ing body was trans­formed from one made up of eight sep­ar­ate city coun­cil dis­tricts each rep­res­ent­ing a dis­tinct part of the city and group of voters, to one with six sep­ar­ate dis­tricts and two city-wide seats.

The move ef­fect­ively re­duced Latino vot­ing power in city coun­cil elec­tions. At-large elec­tions typ­ic­ally di­lute Latino vot­ing in­flu­ence be­cause Latino voters of­ten com­prise a far smal­ler group of voters in a city-wide race than they would in a single dis­trict. By con­vert­ing two single-mem­ber city coun­cil dis­tricts in­to city-wide seats for which can­did­ates must com­pete for voters all over town, Pas­adena ef­fect­ively turned back the clock on Latino voter in­flu­ence. The city did so with im­pun­ity.

Make no mis­take—minor­ity vot­ing rights around the coun­try are im­periled. That’s why all voters, in­clud­ing Lati­nos, de­serve a mod­ern, ef­fect­ive VRA.

One of the goals of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Latino Elec­ted and Ap­poin­ted Of­fi­cials (NA­LEO) is to strengthen Amer­ic­an demo­cracy by pro­mot­ing the full par­ti­cip­a­tion of Lati­nos in civic life. And one of the best ways to do this is to en­sure that all cit­izens are giv­en free and fair ac­cess to the bal­lot box.

In Janu­ary, a bi­par­tis­an group in Con­gress in­tro­duced a bill that would mod­ern­ize the VRA to make it more rel­ev­ant, flex­ible, and ef­fect­ive. NA­LEO sup­ports this pro­cess, be­cause this bill would in­sti­tute com­mon­sense safe­guards to en­sure that all U.S. cit­izens, re­gard­less of race or lan­guage, are able to fully ex­er­cise their fun­da­ment­al right to par­ti­cip­ate in elec­tions. The bill in­cludes en­hanced trans­par­ency pro­vi­sions so that subtle changes with the po­ten­tial to sig­ni­fic­antly af­fect voters no longer fly be­low the radar. This in­cludes, for ex­ample, changes in the num­ber of poll work­ers and oth­er vot­ing re­sources as­signed to par­tic­u­lar pre­cincts, a likely con­trib­ut­ing factor to long lines en­countered by Latino voters dur­ing the 2012 elec­tions.

This is a crit­ic­al step in en­sur­ing that Amer­ica’s Latino pop­u­la­tion is able to en­joy the con­sti­tu­tion­al right to vote — now and in the years to come. Still, there is room for im­prove­ment. We are hope­ful that, through a de­lib­er­at­ive and open bi­par­tis­an pro­cess, ad­di­tion­al pro­tec­tions for Lati­nos and oth­er minor­ity voters will be in­cluded. Groups like NA­LEO would like to see the ne­ces­sary com­mit­tees con­sider the is­sue soon, a crit­ic­al step be­fore a bill could go to the House or Sen­ate floor for a vote.

It’s es­sen­tial that we have the tools provided by a mod­ern, ef­fect­ive VRA to ad­dress the cur­rent dis­crim­in­at­ory prac­tices that threaten the rights of Lati­nos and oth­ers to vote and to shape this coun­try. Pro­tect­ing the right to vote isn’t a par­tis­an is­sue and it isn’t about who wins or loses elec­tions. It’s about com­mon sense steps that will guard the right of every­one to vote, no mat­ter their race, where they live, or what lan­guage they speak.

Let’s en­sure the prom­ise of Amer­ica’s demo­cracy re­mains a real­ity for all.

Ar­turo Var­gas is the Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Latino Elec­ted and Ap­poin­ted Of­fi­cials (NA­LEO), the lead­er­ship or­gan­iz­a­tion of the na­tion’s more than 6,000 Latino elec­ted and ap­poin­ted of­fi­cials.

HAVE AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS? The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic and so­cial im­pacts of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force and health.  Email us. Please fol­low us on Twit­ter and Face­book.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
23 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login