A senior U.S. diplomat stressed Russia’s “self-interest” in eliminating Syria’s chemical arms, as a rift grew between Moscow and other capitals over Ukraine.
Russia’s key role in a global operation to destroy the weapons held by its Damascus ally is “not a favor to the United States,” but rather it reflects shared objectives, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns said on Thursday. Moscow laid the groundwork for the disarmament initiative last September, after an Aug. 21 nerve-gas strike in Syria’s civil war prompted threats of foreign military action against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime.
“I believe Russia remains committed to the object here, which is the removal and destruction of all of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile,” Burns said during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.
The senior envoy made his comments in response to questions from Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who asked how an international crisis over Russia’s armed intervention in Ukraine has affected multilateral efforts to pull Assad’s chemical weapons out of conflict-torn Syria. Because of tensions over Ukraine, NATO this week suspended its plans to team with Russia in guarding the Syrian government’s deadliest warfare chemicals during destruction at sea.
Burns minimized the Ukraine standoff’s potential impact on the chemical-removal effort, which has encountered delays recently. U.S. officials and their allies have accused Assad’s regime of intentional foot-dragging. Last September, Russia and the United States hammered out a plan calling for the destruction of the entire Syrian chemical arsenal by the middle of 2014.
“By the beginning of next week about 35 percent of that stockpile should be removed from Syria,” Burns said. “It’s still possible to meet the 30th of June target that’s been set, and I think it’s vitally important to do that, and that’s an area where I believe Russia has a self-interest in trying to ensure that that happens.”
Moscow has made “a very visible and public commitment” to eliminating the Syrian government’s chemical arsenal, Burns said in his testimony. “I think [Russia] has a self-interest in trying to ensure that that happens. And you know, we will certainly do everything we can to help ensure it does.”
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”