A senior U.S. diplomat stressed Russia’s “self-interest” in eliminating Syria’s chemical arms, as a rift grew between Moscow and other capitals over Ukraine.
Russia’s key role in a global operation to destroy the weapons held by its Damascus ally is “not a favor to the United States,” but rather it reflects shared objectives, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns said on Thursday. Moscow laid the groundwork for the disarmament initiative last September, after an Aug. 21 nerve-gas strike in Syria’s civil war prompted threats of foreign military action against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime.
“I believe Russia remains committed to the object here, which is the removal and destruction of all of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile,” Burns said during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.
The senior envoy made his comments in response to questions from Senator Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who asked how an international crisis over Russia’s armed intervention in Ukraine has affected multilateral efforts to pull Assad’s chemical weapons out of conflict-torn Syria. Because of tensions over Ukraine, NATO this week suspended its plans to team with Russia in guarding the Syrian government’s deadliest warfare chemicals during destruction at sea.
Burns minimized the Ukraine standoff’s potential impact on the chemical-removal effort, which has encountered delays recently. U.S. officials and their allies have accused Assad’s regime of intentional foot-dragging. Last September, Russia and the United States hammered out a plan calling for the destruction of the entire Syrian chemical arsenal by the middle of 2014.
“By the beginning of next week about 35 percent of that stockpile should be removed from Syria,” Burns said. “It’s still possible to meet the 30th of June target that’s been set, and I think it’s vitally important to do that, and that’s an area where I believe Russia has a self-interest in trying to ensure that that happens.”
Moscow has made “a very visible and public commitment” to eliminating the Syrian government’s chemical arsenal, Burns said in his testimony. “I think [Russia] has a self-interest in trying to ensure that that happens. And you know, we will certainly do everything we can to help ensure it does.”
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."