Feds Again Ground Commercial Drone Use

The Federal Aviation Administration is appealing a judge’s ruling this week that said a ban on commercial drones lacked proper authority.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
March 7, 2014, 10:57 a.m.

The Fed­er­al Avi­ation Ad­min­is­tra­tion an­nounced Fri­day it would ap­peal a judge’s de­cision that the gov­ern­ment lacks au­thor­ity to ban com­mer­cial drones in the U.S., a move that will again ground the un­manned aer­i­al vehicles un­til fur­ther guid­ance is is­sued.

“The FAA is ap­peal­ing the de­cision of an NTSB ad­min­is­trat­ive law judge to the full Na­tion­al Trans­port­a­tion Safety Board, which has the ef­fect of stay­ing the de­cision un­til the board rules,” the agency said in a state­ment. “The agency is con­cerned that this de­cision could im­pact the safe op­er­a­tion of the na­tion­al air­space sys­tem and the safety of people and prop­erty on the ground.”

NTSB Judge Patrick Ger­aghty ruled Thursday that doc­u­ments the FAA cited to jus­ti­fy its drone ban were either meant for in­tern­al use by of­fi­cials or failed to com­ply with prop­er rule-mak­ing guidelines.

The case, Pirk­er v. Huerta, in­volved a Swiss drone op­er­at­or who was fined $10,00 for reck­lessly pi­lot­ing a drone dur­ing the film­ing of a com­mer­cial for the Uni­versity of Vir­gin­ia. Though the FAA has sent nu­mer­ous or­ders to cease drone op­er­a­tions, Raphael Pirk­er was the first to be hit with a fine for vi­ol­at­ing the ban.

Be­fore this week’s rul­ing, the FAA was sched­uled to set new drone rules by Septem­ber 2015, when it had hoped to de­vel­op a clear plan to safely in­teg­rate the tech­no­logy in­to com­mer­cial air­space. But last month fed­er­al reg­u­lat­ors told law­makers the agency likely wouldn’t be ready to fully in­teg­rate by that tar­get, fol­low­ing a pat­tern of missed dead­lines set by Con­gress.

What We're Following See More »
PASSAGE NOT GUARANTEED
House Freedom Caucus Endorses Obamacare Replacement
26 minutes ago
BREAKING

After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.

COULD RATTLE MARKETS
White House Working On Order To Leave NATO
1 hours ago
BREAKING
IRANIANS CAME WITHIN 1,000 METERS
U.S. Navy Vessel Fired Flare at Iranian Boat on Monday
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.

Source:
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login