The Christie administration is creating more car problems.
That’s at least according to Tesla Motors, which could lose its right to sell vehicles in New Jersey because of a regulation proposed by the governor’s office.
The electric car company wrote in a post on its website Tuesday that Gov. Chris Christie’s administration has backed out of a deal that would delay licensing legislation, passing it instead to the state Legislature, which is expected to approve it later Tuesday.
The rule would require all new car dealers to sign a franchise agreement with automobile manufacturers in order to receive a license from the state. However, as Stephen Edelstein explains at Green Car Reports, since Tesla is both the manufacturer and distributor of its cars — which means there’s no middleman — such an agreement would be impossible.
“The administration has decided to go outside the legislative process by expediting a rule proposal that would completely change the law in New Jersey,” Tesla Motors explains. In months previous, the company had been “working constructively” with the administration and the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission. “This new rule, if adopted, would curtail Tesla’s sales operations and jeopardize our existing retail licenses in the state.”
Tesla called on Christie to withdraw or change the proposed amendment. The company’s existing two locations in New Jersey would be in violation of New Jersey law if it passes. The regulation would be a win for the New Jersey Coalition of Automotive Retailers, which favors the use of a third-party dealer.
A Christie administration spokesman told Business Insider Tuesday that Tesla Motors has it all wrong: The car company is the one trying to skirt legislative procedure, not the other way around. “This administration does not find it appropriate to unilaterally change the way cars are sold in New Jersey without legislation and Tesla has been aware of this position since the beginning,” he said in a statement.
Tesla Motors’ direct-sales model has faced resistance in other states as well. The company has defeated legislation that would curtail its business in Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, and North Carolina. In Ohio, car dealers have pushed for regulations that would ban manufacturers from selling cars directly to consumers, and Arizona, Colorado, Texas, and Virginia have banned new Tesla-owned stores altogether.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."