Giving Aid to Ukraine Is About to Get a Lot More Complicated

A woman cries as she stay on Kiev's Independence Square on February 25, 2014. Ukraine issued an arrest warrant Monday for ousted president Viktor Yanukovych over the 'mass murder' of protesters and appealed for $35 billion in Western aid to pull the crisis-hit country from the brink of economic collapse. The dramatic announcements by the ex-Soviet nation's new Western-leaning team -- approved by parliament over a chaotic weekend that saw the pro-Russian leader go into hiding -- came as a top EU envoy arrived in Kiev to buttress its sudden tilt away from Moscow.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Stacy Kaper
March 11, 2014, 2:12 p.m.

A push by Sen­ate Demo­crats to tie a con­tro­ver­sial fund­ing pro­vi­sion to a Ukraine-aid bill could thwart the pop­u­lar res­ol­u­tion’s chances of be­com­ing law.

Sen. Robert Men­en­dez, chair­man of the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, plans to bring a com­pre­hens­ive Ukraine pack­age be­fore the pan­el Wed­nes­day that in­cludes a meas­ure to em­power the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund to of­fer more aid to na­tions in crisis like Ukraine.

“My goal would be to have an IMF pro­vi­sion in it, and we will see where the de­bate lies as a res­ult of that,” Men­en­dez said Tues­day. “It’s nev­er over till it’s ex­actly over, but we should be there.”

A Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship aide said that the con­tro­versy over the IMF pro­vi­sion — which is sup­por­ted by the ad­min­is­tra­tion but op­posed by many Re­pub­lic­ans — could fur­ther drag out the pro­cess and make it harder to en­act the Ukraine le­gis­la­tion be­fore law­makers leave town next week.

The House has already passed its aid pack­age for Ukraine, which did not in­clude the IMF pro­vi­sion. The cham­ber is ex­pec­ted to put up a fight over in­clud­ing it now.

A key prob­lem with in­clud­ing the IMF pro­vi­sion in the Ukraine pack­age is that Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell and House Speak­er John Boehner want to use it as lever­age with Pres­id­ent Obama, ac­cord­ing to a Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­or who asked not to be named in or­der to speak more freely. They want to trade the IMF re­form sought by the Treas­ury De­part­ment for turn­ing around a pro­posed change in the tax code that would make it harder for so­cial-wel­fare or­gan­iz­a­tions to con­trib­ute to the polit­ic­al pro­cess.

“The reas­on why it is con­tro­ver­sial is be­cause Mc­Con­nell and Boehner want the “¦ out­side con­tri­bu­tions taken care of by Treas­ury in ex­change for an IMF fix,” the sen­at­or said.

IMF fund­ing is a long-stalled pri­or­ity of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, which wants to trans­fer money from the IMF’s crisis ac­count to its gen­er­al fund. A change is in­ten­ded to com­plete a set of re­forms from 2010, which could al­low the IMF to in­crease re­sources avail­able for aid and in­crease the re­spons­ib­il­ity and in­flu­ence of emer­ging eco­nom­ies at the IMF.

“I’m con­cerned that all you do is a pack­age that has a very short be­ne­fit and doesn’t deal with some of the crit­ic­al is­sues,” Men­en­dez said of the House bill.

Sev­er­al mem­bers of the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee from both parties said Tues­day that they ex­pec­ted some ver­sion of the IMF pro­vi­sion to be in­cluded in the aid pack­age, but said they had not been privy to the latest de­tails. And sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans said they would have to see the fi­nal ver­sion be­fore they could take a stance on the im­plic­a­tions of an IMF meas­ure.

Demo­crats are largely on board with the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s goal, but Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans offered mixed views.

Sens. Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina and Johnny Isak­son of Geor­gia — neither of whom serve on the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee — said they sup­port in­clud­ing the IMF pro­vi­sion.

Gra­ham said the re­turn on in­vest­ment for the United States is worth it.

“If you don’t want to use mil­it­ary force all the time, which I do not; if you want to get ahead of dan­ger­ous move­ments in the world; if you want to re­in­force people who are help­ful to you change be­ha­vi­or; IMF is the way to do it,” he said. “I hope it is in the pack­age.”

But Gra­ham ad­ded he knows some in his party are wary of for­eign aid.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ron John­son of Wis­con­sin, who serves on the com­mit­tee, said the pro­vi­sion was un­ne­ces­sar­ily adding par­tis­an drama to an is­sue where U.S. poli­cy­makers should be “uni­fied” and “speak with one voice” in sup­port­ing the Ukraine and con­demning Rus­sia for its in­cur­sion.

“We shouldn’t be do­ing that. There are many con­tro­ver­sial ele­ments to that.”¦ You are re­du­cing power, you are in­creas­ing fund­ing, there are a num­ber of as­pects of that bill that con­ser­vat­ives would not sup­port,” he said.

Still, John­son said he needed to re­view the fi­nal de­tails be­fore de­cid­ing how he would vote.

Sen. John Mc­Cain echoed John­son’s sen­ti­ment on un­ne­ces­sary con­tro­versy. He ar­gued that al­though he sup­ports the IMF change, he be­lieves the Ukraine pack­age should be passed and fin­ished this week be­fore Con­gress ad­journs, wheth­er or not the lan­guage is in­cluded.

“It would be dis­grace­ful if we let that kind of dis­pute pre­vent the Con­gress of the United States act­ing on this,” he said. “The IMF lan­guage “¦ pales in com­par­is­on to the im­per­at­ive for us to act in light of the in­va­sion of a sov­er­eign na­tion, which is what Vladi­mir Putin has just done.”¦ I’m not go­ing to let IMF stand in the way of a re­ac­tion of Con­gress on an in­va­sion of a coun­try, and if oth­ers do, then they have their pri­or­it­ies ter­ribly skewed.”

Jordain Carney contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

SAYS THEY CHEATED TESTS
Government Sues Fiat Chrysler Over Emissions
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The government alleges the company put eight “software-based features” on diesel engines in nearly 104,000 Ram pickups and Jeep Grand Cherokees from the 2014 to 2016 model years, which allowed the vehicles to emit fewer pollutants during EPA lab tests than during normal driving conditions.

Source:
KEY ON TRUMPCARE
MacArthur Resigns As Tuesday Group Co-Chair
7 hours ago
BREAKING

Rep. Tom MacArthur resigned Tuesday from his position as co-chair of the Tuesday Group, the House caucus of more moderate GOP members. MacArthur was one of the key engineers in getting an Obamacare replacement plan passed through the House of Representatives, which has caused a rift within the Tuesday Group. "You can't lead people where they don't want to go," MacArthur told POLITICO New Jersey. "I think some people in the group just have a different view of what governing is."

Source:
COULD RUN AFOUL OF LAW
Trump Wants to Sell Half of Strategic Oil Reserve
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

The budget proposal would raise $500 million in fiscal year 2018 and as much as $16.6 billion in oil sales over the next decade. However, selling half of the reserve would risk taking it below the legally required minimum of 450 million barrels.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login