In some cities, the underground commercial sex economy accounts for as much as $300 million a year.
That’s according to a first-of-its-kind study, funded by the Justice Department and conducted by the Urban Institute, that provides estimates on the size of the underground sex economy.
The study focused on eight cities in 2003 and 2007, chosen to show regional diversity and also because of available data, official cooperation, and the availability of a sufficient number of convicted pimps and sex traffickers. In major cities such as Miami, the underground sex economy was estimated as $302 million in 2003; in Atlanta, it was $290 million in 2007. Washington’s underground sex economy accounted for $100 million in 2007.
“We’re not trying to make a statement that these cities need to worry because they are a hub for this,” lead researcher Meredith Dank said. “Part of it is regional diversity in saying this is happening everywhere; there is a lot of money being made no matter what city you go in.”
The figures provide a snapshot of the size of the underground sex economy, which grew from 2003 to 2007 in some cities. The figures also show that in many of the cities studied, the underground sex economy exceeds the drug and weapons economies. For instance, the underground drug trade in Miami was estimated at nearly $94 million in 2003, when the sex economy was $302 million.
Dank spent three years conducting extensive field research and interviews with former pimps, sex traffickers, sex workers, and law-enforcement officials. While much research and focus on sex trafficking has focused on victims and sex workers, this study provides insight into how pimps and traffickers operate.
“Having done research in this field for many years now, it answers a lot of stuff that we only knew anecdotally, but it also debunks some of the myths that get talked about within media and advocacy work,” Dank said.
One of those myths? That physical coercion is the main tool pimps use — only 15 percent of those interviewed admitted to being physical with sex workers. Dank says that while many likely would not admit to using physical force, psychological coercion plays a huge role in the underground sex economy.
Another misconception is that all sex workers are forced to use drugs. “What we found is that at least a quarter of the individuals we interviewed actually had a strict rule not to use drugs, because it ‘ruined the merchandise,’ ” she said. “There certainly are cases where there is forced drug use and a lot of drug use, but we need to start looking at all factors that come into play when you’re looking at the underground sex economy, particularly when it comes to sex trafficking, because it’s the only real way that you’re going to address it the best.”
Pimps reported believing that pimping was less risky than other forms of crime, despite acknowledging getting arrested as the biggest risk they faced.
The study also examined the use of child pornography, which has grown rapidly online and is increasingly depicting more graphic content involving very young children and even babies. Many of those interviewed who had been charged with distributing and possession (“noncontact” offenses), tended to believe their crimes were victimless because they weren’t involved with producing new images.
Researchers suggest a litany of actions based on the findings in the nearly 400-page report, ranging from including coercion among the legal definitions of sex trafficking, to mandating that trafficking-hotline numbers be included on websites such as Craigslist and Backpage.com.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."