One of the top supporters of the National Security Agency is now calling for an end to the agency’s controversial practice of collecting data on millions of U.S. phone calls.
Under the proposal from Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, the phone companies, not the NSA, would hold the phone data. NSA analysts could access the records only if they first obtain an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
His proposal would not impose any mandate on the phone companies to maintain the data — an idea that would face fierce resistance from civil-liberties groups and the phone companies themselves.
In an interview with National Journal, Ruppersberger argued that a new data-retention mandate is unnecessary because the Federal Communications Commission already requires phone companies to maintain their records for 18 months in case there are disputes over billing.
Most NSA searches involve phone calls that are less than 18 months old, according to Ruppersberger.
The proposal is a shift for the Democratic lawmaker, who is one of the most vocal defenders of the NSA on Capitol Hill.
“I represent NSA,” said Ruppersberger, whose district includes NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, Md. “NSA and the people who work there do an excellent job.”
But he acknowledged that in the wake of the leaks by Edward Snowden, there is now a widespread view that the agency is invading people’s privacy.
“We’ve got to find a way to get the confidence of the American people back so they will respect NSA as much as they respect the military,” he said.
He argued that his plan would bolster privacy protections while maintaining the NSA’s ability to uncover terrorist plots.
Ruppersberger proposal is in line with President Obama’s goal of giving up NSA control of the phone database while maintaining the program’s capability. The administration is currently reviewing several options for overhauling the program, including having phone companies hold the data and giving the data to a third-party group.
The White House is expected to announce its plan for the program before March 28.
But Ruppersberger warned that no matter what plan the White House comes up with, the program could expire next year when the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is up for renewal.
He said he is working with House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers on legislation that would revamp and extend the law.
“I’m not sure whether we could get the votes to pass another FISA bill,” Ruppersberger said. “Mike and I realize we have to make a change.”
But he acknowledged that the House Intelligence chairman is not on board yet with his proposal to limit the NSA phone sweeps.
In an emailed statement, Rogers said he continues to work with Ruppersberger and other lawmakers “to craft a proposal that will address the concerns around bulk data storage, protect civil liberties, increase transparency and confidence in the government’s intelligence-collection activities, and maintain a targeted capability for counterterrorism operations.”
Caitlin Hayden, a White House spokesperson, said the president hasn’t decided yet on his plan for the program.
Ruppersberger’s proposal would not strengthen the standard NSA analysts need to meet before reviewing phone records. Currently, the NSA collects millions of records, but only accesses the database if there is a “reasonable, articulable suspicion” that a phone number is connected to terrorism.
Under the USA Freedom Act, a tougher bill from GOP Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner and Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, the NSA would need to show that a record is relevant to a terrorism investigation and pertains to an agent of a “foreign power.”
But Ruppersberger argued that the USA Freedom Act’s standard is too restrictive.
“In my opinion that would put our country at risk,” he said. The Maryland Democrat argued that intelligence agents are trying to thwart terrorist attacks and they shouldn’t be held to the same standard as police or prosecutors trying to obtain evidence for a trial after the crime has already been committed.
In a statement, Sensenbrenner applauded Ruppersberger for agreeing that bulk data collection should end and urged him to sign on to the USA Freedom Act.
“It strikes the proper balance between security and privacy, and I am confident it has the votes to pass,” Sensenbrenner said.
What We're Following See More »
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."
On Tuesday, President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines threatened to kick U.S. troops out of the country, adding that if he remains president for more than one term he will move to terminate all military deals with America. Last week, Duterte called for a separation between the two countries, though other government officials immediately said he did not mean that literally.