House Speaker John Boehner has sent a formal invitation to Pope Francis to speak at a joint session of Congress on behalf of congressional leadership from both parties and chambers, his office announced Thursday.
“Pope Francis has inspired millions of Americans with his pastoral manner and servant leadership, challenging all people to lead lives of mercy, forgiveness, solidarity, and humble service,” the speaker said in a statement. Americans, Boehner said, “have embraced Pope Francis’ reminder that we cannot meet our responsibility to the poor with a welfare mentality based on business calculations. We can meet it only with personal charity on the one hand and sound, inclusive policies on the other.”
Boehner, who is Catholic, isn’t the first U.S. politician to try and bring the pope into American politics. In a major economic speech last December, President Obama directly quoted Francis, asking, “How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market loses 2 points?”
Boehner and Obama have reason to evoke the pope. Francis, who has now been pope for one year, is wildly popular stateside. In a December Washington Post poll, 69 percent of all respondents had a favorable view of the pope, including 92 percent of Catholics. A more recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that 55 percent of Americans either have a somewhat positive (22 percent) or very positive (33 percent) view of the pope.
Compare that outlook to how Americans view Congress and the president. In the same NBC/WSJ poll, only 34 percent of Americans said their member of Congress deserved another term, and 54 percent said they’d vote to replace every single member. Obama, for his part, hit a new low in that poll, with a 41 percent approval rating.
A visit from Pope Francis isn’t going to change those numbers. But when a majority of Americans are looking for compromise, the pope sure seems like the only person who can actually bring Republicans and Democrats together — even if it’s just for a speech.
What We're Following See More »
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."
Donald Trump's "transition team will meet next week with representatives of the tech industry, multiple sources confirmed, even as their candidate largely has been largely shunned by Silicon Valley. The meeting, scheduled for next Thursday at the offices of law and lobbying firm BakerHostetler, will include trade groups like the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association that represent major Silicon Valley companies."