Connecticut Governor Wages Food Fight With Boehner

HARTFORD, CT - APRIL 4: Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy speaks during the gun control law signing event at the Connecticut Capitol pril 4, 2013 in Hartford, Connecticut, After more than 13 hours of debate, the Connecticut General Assembly approved the gun-control bill early April 4, that proponents see as the toughest-in-the-nation response to the Demember 14, 2012 Newtown school shootings. (Photo by Christopher Capozziello/Getty Images)
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Billy House
March 17, 2014, 9:08 a.m.

Con­nectic­tut Gov. Dan­nel Mal­loy blas­ted Speak­er John Boehner as “disin­genu­ous at best and shame­ful at worst” on Monday for call­ing some states cheat­ers and frauds be­cause they are thwart­ing con­gres­sion­al ef­forts to re­duce food-stamp pay­ments.

“Con­gress wrote the bill. Con­gress passed the bill. And now states are im­ple­ment­ing the law, your rep­re­hens­ible com­ments not­with­stand­ing,” Demo­crat Mal­loy wrote in his let­ter to the speak­er.

“Fur­ther­more, your de­mon­iz­a­tion of states that have elec­ted to provide this be­ne­fit im­pugns the chil­dren, the eld­erly, the dis­abled, the low-wage work­ers, and vet­er­ans who re­ceive such aid by im­ply­ing that they are a party to something crim­in­al,” Mal­loy stated.

“Any gov­ernor who chooses to un­der­mine the bi­par­tis­an re­forms in the farm bill is weak­en­ing the crit­ic­al home-heat­ing pro­gram and tak­ing money out of every Amer­ic­an tax­pay­er’s pock­et,” Boehner spokes­man Mi­chael Steel said in re­sponse to Mal­loy’s let­ter.

At is­sue are ef­forts by Mal­loy and the gov­ernors in Mas­sachu­setts, New York, Ore­gon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Is­land, and Ver­mont to main­tain cur­rent levels of food stamps, of­fi­cially known as the Sup­ple­ment­al Nu­tri­tion­al As­sist­ance Pro­gram. Those moves could af­fect por­tions of the re­cently passed farm bill aimed at sav­ing $8.6 bil­lion over the next 10 years.

The farm bill’s much-touted re­duc­tions were brought about largely by chan­ging eli­gib­il­ity re­quire­ments for food stamps, which are based in some cases on eli­gib­il­ity for low-in­come heat­ing as­sist­ance provided by the states. As many as 17 states could pay out as little as $1 to re­cip­i­ents to boost that per­son’s eli­gib­il­ity for food aid. The farm bill changed that re­quire­ment to at least $20.01, and the as­sump­tion was that the fed­er­al fund­ing for the food-stamps pro­gram would de­crease as a res­ult.

Yet in an ef­fort to avoid the cuts, Con­necti­c­ut of­fi­cials have shif­ted an ad­ded $1.4 mil­lion of funds avail­able un­der the Con­necti­c­ut En­ergy As­sist­ance Pro­gram to meet the new threshold. The move is ex­pec­ted to pre­serve about $66.6 mil­lion in an­nu­al food-stamp be­ne­fits for house­holds in Con­necti­c­ut.

And oth­er states have said they are pur­su­ing or con­sid­er­ing sim­il­ar ef­forts.

Mal­loy, in his let­ter on Monday, noted that me­dia ac­counts have quoted Boehner as re­spond­ing, “Since the pas­sage of the farm bill, states have found ways to cheat, once again, on sign­ing up people for food stamps…. And so I would hope the House would act to try and stop this cheat­ing and this fraud from con­tinu­ing.”

But Mal­loy poin­ted out that his state and oth­ers are im­ple­ment­ing an op­tion spelled out in the law.

“To char­ac­ter­ize as cheat­ing and fraud states’ im­ple­ment­a­tion of this pro­vi­sion is disin­genu­ous at best and shame­ful at worst,” Mal­loy wrote. “Con­gress in­ten­ded to grant states the au­thor­ity to provide this vi­tal be­ne­fit, which is a life­line to some of our most vul­ner­able con­stitu­ents.”

“To the con­trary, I think most would ar­gue that deny­ing res­id­ents of my state $112 a month in nu­tri­tion as­sist­ance is mor­ally wrong,” he stated.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Statehood, Metro Come Up as Bowser Meets Trump
2 minutes ago
THE LATEST

DC Mayor Muriel Bowser met with Donald Trump this morning in Manhattan, with statehood and the Metro system on the agenda. “We talked about the things that are important to Washingtonians, and certainly becoming the 51st state is one of them," she said after the meeting. She also made the point that the District is “not dependent on the federal government for our funds," and brought up funding for Metro. She told reporters that Trump is a fan of D.C.

Source:
EVENT IN NC
Mattis Gets the Official Nod Tonight
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
LOWER COURT TO DETERMINE NEW DAMAGES
SCOTUS Sides with Samsung Over Apple
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A unanimous Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with smartphone maker Samsung in its high-profile patent dispute with Apple over design of the iPhone. The justices said Samsung may not be required to pay all the profits it earned from 11 phone models because the features at issue are only a tiny part of the devices. Apple had won a $399 million judgment against Samsung for copying parts of the iPhone's patented design, but the case now returns to a lower court to decide what Samsung must pay."

Source:
AFRAID OF BUDGET CUTS
Pentagon Hid Evidence of Waste
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post."

Source:
TRUMP IS “NOT QUALIFIED FOR THE OFFICE”
Texas GOP Elector Won’t Cast Vote For Trump
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Christopher Suprun, a GOP elector from Texas, announced in an op-ed for The New York Times that he will not cast his vote in the electoral college for Donald Trump. This one vote will not keep Trump from getting to the 270 necessary to secure an electoral victory, but stands as a strong statement of rebuke. "I am asked to cast a vote on Dec. 19 for someone who shows daily he is not qualified for the office," Suprun wrote.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login