The Real Rand Paul-Ted Cruz Battle Is Only Just Beginning

While their faux rivalry soaks up media attention, the senators are moving closer to an inevitable clash.

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) (L) and U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) arrive for the 'Exempt America from Obamacare' rally, on Capitol Hill, September 10, 2013 in Washington, DC. Some conservative lawmakers are making a push to try to defund the health care law as part of the debates over the budget and funding the federal government.
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Emma Roller
March 20, 2014, 1 a.m.

Run, Ted, run.

That’s the mes­sage a new su­per PAC cam­paign, an­nounced Wed­nes­day, is send­ing to the ju­ni­or sen­at­or from Texas. Sen. Ted Cruz’s former re­gion­al dir­ect­or, Raz Shafer, an­nounced his de­par­ture from Cruz’s of­fice to run the or­gan­iz­a­tion, Draft Ted Cruz for Pres­id­ent, in the con­ser­vat­ive blog Red­State.

“When Re­pub­lic­ans run for the White House as con­ser­vat­ives, we win. When they run as mod­er­ates, we lose,” Shafer wrote. “When Re­pub­lic­ans were ready to cave on gun con­trol in early 2013, Ted Cruz was one of the few who fought to stop it. When Re­pub­lic­ans were ready to roll over on Obama­care, Ted Cruz re­fused. And when Re­pub­lic­ans tried to de­ceive their con­stitu­ents on the debt lim­it, Ted Cruz re­fused to go along and fought for us.”

While his former staff was en­cour­aging him to run for the White House, Cruz was (where else?) in Iowa. He’s vis­ited the state four times in the last eight months — more than any oth­er rumored Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial con­tender, with one ex­cep­tion — Rand Paul.

The me­dia nar­rat­ive over the past couple weeks has fo­cused on the dif­fer­ences between Cruz and Paul, who are both mak­ing their pres­id­en­tial am­bi­tions more and more clear. (A smart piece writ­ten by Jason Zengerle in The New Re­pub­lic re­cently shows how Paul and Cruz have ac­tu­ally switched per­son­al­it­ies since ar­riv­ing in Wash­ing­ton.)

And they’ve had some drama, at least by D.C. stand­ards. It star­ted when Cruz com­pared his for­eign policy agenda to that of Ron­ald Re­agan, and said his philo­sophy falls some­where between Sen. John Mc­Cain and Paul. The next day, Paul wrote a column for Breit­bart im­ply­ing that hawk­ish Re­pub­lic­ans like Cruz mis­rep­res­ent Re­agan’s true vis­ion.

On Dana Loesch’s ra­dio show Wed­nes­day, Cruz dis­pelled the drama between him and Paul. “I love Rand Paul,” he told Loesch. “He is a good friend, he is a tre­mend­ous voice for liberty, and I’m proud to stand with Rand.”

Dur­ing his stop in Iowa, Cruz also hit the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion for hav­ing “badly bungled” the situ­ation in Ukraine, and called school choice “the civil-rights is­sue of the 21st cen­tury.”

While Cruz spoke to Chris­ti­an con­ser­vat­ives in Iowa, Paul vis­ited the Bay Area to speak at the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (Berke­ley) — not ex­actly a bas­tion of con­ser­vat­ism — about the U.S. “dysto­pi­an night­mare.” And Paul’s pres­id­en­tial am­bi­tions are no secret, either. The Ken­tucky Sen­ate re­cently passed a bill en­sur­ing Paul could con­cur­rently run for Sen­ate and pres­id­ent in 2016.

Paul has said the Re­pub­lic­an Party should “agree to dis­agree” on so­cial is­sues in or­der to wel­come more voters in­to the fold.

“The Re­pub­lic­an Party is not go­ing to give up on hav­ing quite a few people who do be­lieve in tra­di­tion­al mar­riage,” Paul told the web­site Voc­at­iv. “But the Re­pub­lic­an Party also has to find a place for young people and oth­ers who don’t want to be fes­tooned by those is­sues.”

Cruz begs to dif­fer.

“I think we’ve seen that in or­der for the Re­pub­lic­an Party to suc­ceed, we need to be a big tent. We need to em­brace Amer­ic­an val­ues,” he told the Des Moines Re­gister. “There are some who say the Re­pub­lic­an Party should no longer stand for life. I don’t agree with them. There are some who say the Re­pub­lic­an party should no longer stand for tra­di­tion­al mar­riage. I don’t agree with them either. I think we should con­tin­ue to de­fend our shared val­ues.”

But when asked if that meant that he dis­agreed with Paul, Cruz de­murred. While polit­ic­al news out­lets like to hype a “polit­ic­al rivalry” as much as pos­sible, the real fire­works between Cruz and Paul are years in the mak­ing — we’ll have to wait for the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an primary de­bates for those.

In the mean­time, the Draft Ted Cruz cam­paign hopes to gath­er 1 mil­lion sig­na­tures en­cour­aging Cruz to run. As of this writ­ing, the web­site had gathered a little more than 400 sig­na­tures.

But Cruz has shown he doesn’t ex­actly need ex­tra con­vin­cing.

What We're Following See More »
PENCE BREAKS THE TIE
Senate Will Debate House Bill
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

By the narrowest of margins, the Senate voted 51-50 this afternoon to begin debate on the House's legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins defected from the GOP, but Vice President Pence broke a tie. Sen. John McCain returned from brain surgery to cast his vote.

Source:
WON’T SAY IF HE’LL FIRE HIM
Trump “Disappointed” in Sessions
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“'It’s not like a great loyal thing about the endorsement,'” Mr. Trump said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. 'I’m very disappointed in Jeff Sessions.'”

Source:
MURKOWSKI, COLLINS VOTE NAY
Republicans Reach 50 Votes to Proceed on Health Bill
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
INTERVIEWED KUSHNER FOR OVER THREE HOURS
House Russia Probe: Kushner “Satisfied” Questions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Republicans who interviewed Jared Kushner for more than three hours in the House’s Russia probe on Tuesday said the president’s son-in-law and adviser came across as candid and cooperative. 'His answers were forthcoming and complete. He satisfied all my questions,' said Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), who’s leading the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, including possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign."

Source:
VICTORY FOR GUN RIGHTS ADVOCATES
Appeals Court Block D.C. Gun Control Law
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday blocked a gun regulation in Washington, D.C., that limited the right to carry a handgun in public to those with a special need for self-defense, handing a victory to gun rights advocates. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's 2-1 ruling struck down the local government's third major attempt in 40 years to limit handgun rights, citing what it said was scant but clear guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court on the right to bear arms."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login