Sheldon Adelson is already wielding his super-rich influence in the 2014 elections to advance the issue he and his billion-dollar pockets care about most.
Lawmakers in both chambers of Congress are expected to drop bipartisan bills next week to “restore” a decades-old federal ban on certain kinds of betting operations and extend it to include Internet gambling — a cause the billionaire casino magnate has vocally championed.
The companion bills, championed by Rep. Jason Chaffetz and Sen. Lindsey Graham, both Republicans, would amend parts of the 1961 Wire Act to include limitations on “any transmission over the Internet carried interstate or in foreign commerce,” according to a three-page draft circulating. The law had historically been used to police all forms of gambling but was largely nullified in 2011, when the Justice Department issued a formal ruling that limited its scope to only sports betting.
While Chaffetz has long expressed skepticism about online betting, Graham has historically been quiet on the issue — until now. The South Carolina Republican’s sudden interest coincides with an infusion of campaign cash from Adelson, who has donated more than $15,000 to Graham’s 2014 bid to earn a third Senate term. Graham is eager to bone up on his conservative credentials in a Southern state, as he is in the throes of fending off a crowded field of challengers in his state’s June primary.
“There’s no doubt that these bills are being pushed at the behest of Sheldon Adelson,” said John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, which opposes most restrictions on online betting.
Adelson launched his Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling late last year, amid a growing movement in several statehouses to lower restrictions on online gambling. The octogenarian, best known for attempting to sway elections by dumping limitless money into campaigns, has vowed to “spend whatever it takes” to stop online betting, an industry he has derided as “a societal train wreck waiting to happen.”
“We support and applaud all efforts to restore the long-standing interpretation that the Wire Act prohibits Internet gambling,” Adelson’s group said in a statement. “It’s common sense that putting a virtual casino in the pocket of every American with a smartphone is bad public policy.”
Of note in the draft bill is an exemption for betting on horseracing, which may be included to appease Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. Fantasy games are also carved out.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."