Harry Reid is asking the Senate’s top law-enforcement official to investigate how documents on a powerful committee’s computers were obtained, marking the latest battle cry in the ongoing standoff between the CIA and Congress.
The Senate majority leader, in separate letters to Attorney General Eric Holder and CIA Director John Brennan, said he has instructed the Senate sergeant-at-arms to carry out a “forensic examination” of a computer network that had been meant for exclusive use by the Senate Intelligence Community in order to determine how the CIA’s internal “Panetta review” detailing Bush-era foreign interrogation practices got there.
“The CIA’s decision to access the resources and work produce of the legislative branch without permission is absolutely indefensible, regardless of the context,” Reid wrote in his letter to Holder.
The Nevada Democrat also summarily dismissed any notion that Senate staffers hacked the CIA’s computers to illicitly obtain the review. The CIA, in referring the issue to the Justice Department, has claimed the committee illegally confiscated agency documents, though it has not explictedly suggested any hacking took place.
“The allegation that Senate committee staff who have no technical training somehow hacked into the CIA’s highly secure classified networks is so absurd as to be comical,” he said, adding that such accusations undermine the credibility of Brennan’s claim that the agency has never attempted to “thwart” the committee’s investigation.
Reid’s letter is a follow-up to a 40-minute speech Sen. Dianne Feinstein delivered from the chamber floor earlier this week where she accused the CIA of possibly violating the Constitution. Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Community, said the intelligence community improperly accessed computer files that committee staffers were examining as part of a review of the now-defunct Bush-era foreign interrogation programs.
Such surreptitious access of the panel’s files breached an agreement made with former CIA Director Leon Panetta that the CIA would refrain from monitoring the review process, Feinstein said.
“The CIA has not only interfered with the lawful congressional oversight of its activities, but has also seemingly attempted to intimidate its overseers by subjecting them to criminal investigation,” Reid wrote. “These developments strike at the heart of the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches.”
Feinstein has said that the Panetta review was given to her committee on a secure CIA network as part of millions of files handed over for its investigation into waterboarding and other interrogation tactics used during George W. Bush’s presidency. Her committee has written a 6,300-page report on the programs that remains classified.
Reid’s letter to Brennan asks for cooperation to allow the sergeant-at-arms’ staff to proceed with a complete investigation in a “timely and effective manner.”
The CIA said it is “committed to resolving” the ongoing hacking dispute and strengthening its relations overall with Congress.
“The CIA believes in the necessity of effective, strong and bipartisan congressional oversight,” an agency spokesman told National Journal. “We are a far better organization because of congressional oversight, and we will do whatever we can to be responsive to the elected representatives of the American people.”
What We're Following See More »
"On Wednesday afternoon, Rep. Eric Swalwell, (D-Calif.), a Democrat on the House intelligence committee, and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the senior Democrat on the House government oversight committee, announced they were introducing legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate any attempt by the Russian government or persons in Russia to interfere with the recent US election. The commission they propose is modeled on the widely-praised 9/11 Commission."
"Two Colorado presidential electors Tuesday filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging a state law that requires them to vote for the winner of the state’s popular vote," in this case Hillary Clinton. They say they want to "vote for a third-party candidate to keep Trump from receiving 270 electoral votes," and work with other faithless electors around the country to "shift their Democratic votes to a consensus pick."