States Holding Out on Medicaid Expansion Are Beginning to Crack

New Hampshire could be the first of many to sign on.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
March 21, 2014, 1 a.m.

As Planned Par­ent­hood sup­port­ers ral­lied out­side Flor­ida Gov. Rick Scott’s of­fice earli­er this week, state Sen. Arthenia Joyn­er lashed out at op­pon­ents of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. Stand­ing at a wooden lectern, sur­roun­ded by scores of wo­men, she crossed party lines to stump for a bill that would in­crease the num­ber of poor Flor­idi­ans covered by Medi­caid.

“We need to pass Sen. Gar­cia’s bill,” the Demo­crat told the gathered masses, re­fer­ring to a pro­pos­al in­tro­duced by her Re­pub­lic­an col­league Rene Gar­cia. “It was good enough for the speak­er’s fam­ily,” she ad­ded, re­fer­ring to a time when Re­pub­lic­an House Speak­er Will Weather­ford’s fam­ily had re­lied on med­ic­al as­sist­ance to pay for his broth­er’s can­cer treat­ments. “By golly, it’s good enough for all of the fam­il­ies of Flor­ida.” That story, first re­por­ted in The Tampa Tribune, is just the latest sign that Obama­care’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­fort has reached a tip­ping point.

With 25 states and the Dis­trict of Columbia opt­ing in to Medi­caid un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act and an­oth­er six in limbo, the tu­mult in a hand­ful of hol­d­out states is in­creas­ing. The White House hopes un­rest in states like Flor­ida, New Hamp­shire, Neb­raska, and Maine will help turn the fight de­cidedly in their fa­vor. And there’s good reas­on to think that’s hap­pen­ing.

New Hamp­shire, a state that was non­com­mit­tal on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, is now on the brink of ex­pand­ing cov­er­age to ap­prox­im­ately 50,000 poor res­id­ents. The Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled Sen­ate voted to pass a state-mod­i­fied ver­sion of ex­pan­sion earli­er this month. And, on Tues­day, a House pan­el en­dorsed the mo­tion. The Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled House is ex­pec­ted to pass the bill in a vote next week.

In Vir­gin­ia, Demo­crat­ic Gov. Terry McAul­iffe has been fight­ing for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion since he was elec­ted in Novem­ber (the Re­pub­lic­an-led House is op­posed). Ten­sions came to a head this week­end when sev­er­al hun­dred demon­strat­ors gathered out­side the state Cap­it­ol in Rich­mond to rally for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, car­ry­ing signs that read “We need Medi­caid ex­pan­sion now” and “Get sick, go broke, un­ac­cept­able!”

In Pennsylvania, Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Tom Corbett had ori­gin­ally pro­posed a mod­i­fied ver­sion of the pro­gram, ty­ing in a con­tro­ver­sial re­quire­ment that mad­ated those work­ing few­er than 20 hours per week par­ti­cip­ate in a job-train­ing pro­gram to qual­i­fy for cov­er­age. The gov­ernor has since sub­mit­ted a softer pro­pos­al that “re­stores some be­ne­fits” and drops the work-search re­quire­ment in fa­vor of a vol­un­tary pi­lot pro­gram. That plan, cur­rently un­der re­view by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, is un­likely to win sup­port from Wash­ing­ton, giv­en Corbett’s stip­u­la­tions.

Rep­res­ent­at­ives for Utah Gov. Gary Her­bert traveled to D.C. this week to dis­cuss Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­forts with ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials. The gov­ernor, who ini­tially re­frained from opt­ing in, in Janu­ary vowed to take ac­tion on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, say­ing while he op­poses Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law, the state has an ob­lig­a­tion to help its poor. But his pro­pos­al, a “block grant” op­tion that would use fed­er­al dol­lars to cov­er the poor in private plans, failed to win the sup­port of Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers in the House and Sen­ate. The Salt Lake Tribune re­ports that “though he lacks the back­ing of the Le­gis­lature, law­makers haven’t tied his hands.” Her­bert ad­visers meet­ing with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion this week in­clude Wes­ley Smith, dir­ect­or of state and fed­er­al re­la­tions; Dav­id Pat­ton, head of the state’s De­part­ment of Health; and staff mem­bers from the Health De­part­ment’s Medi­caid of­fice, ac­cord­ing to the Deser­et News.

Move­ment in Mis­souri has been sty­mied by a stan­doff between Demo­crat­ic Gov. Jay Nix­on, an ad­voc­ate of ex­pan­sion, and the state’s GOP Le­gis­lature. But even there, the dy­nam­ic is start­ing to shift. re­por­ted Tues­day that Mis­souri politi­cians “might be inch­ing to­ward middle ground that would ex­pand Medi­caid eli­gib­il­ity while re­form­ing the safety-net pro­gram to en­cour­age re­cip­i­ents to work,” ac­cord­ing to two key par­ti­cipants in the talks. Le­gis­la­tion pending in the House is sched­uled for a hear­ing on on March 25.

These stor­ies of in­cre­ment­al pro­gress can also be found in states that have re­jec­ted Medi­caid ex­pan­sion out­right, a de­cision states may change at any time. In Neb­raska, the Le­gis­lature is bat­tling it out over ex­pan­sion with on­look­ers like Demo­crat­ic gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Chuck Hassebrook,who is ur­ging state law­makers to pass a bill that would ex­pand cov­er­age to some 54,000 un­in­sured Neb­raskans. Small protests have be­gun in South Car­o­lina, with demon­strat­ors gath­er­ing out­side the State House park­ing gar­age weekly to protest the state’s de­cision not to ac­cept fed­er­al Medi­caid money. (On Tues­day, the 16 pro­test­ers were sent to court for ob­struct­ing traffic.) And in Maine, state law­makers have backed a com­prom­ise on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion but fell just short of the veto-proof ma­jor­ity needed to get it past Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Paul LePage. (Maine’s ver­sion of the bill would ex­pand the state Medi­caid pro­gram to provide health care cov­er­age for 60,000 to 70,000 in­di­vidu­als earn­ing just over $15,856 a year.)

No doubt many of these bills will con­tin­ue to be sty­mied for some time — vir­tu­ally all of them by people with the means not to rely on such in­sur­ance. And plenty of con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics will con­tin­ue to rage that Medi­caid ex­pan­sion is “sin­ful” and that the Af­ford­able Care Act is “a plot to des­troy the fam­ily.” But it’s look­ing in­creas­ingly like time is not on their side.

What We're Following See More »
FCC Tightens Internet Privacy Standards
9 hours ago

Along party lines, the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted to tighten privacy standards for Internet service providers. "The regulations will require providers to receive explicit customer consent before using an individual’s web browsing or app usage history for marketing purposes. The broadband industry fought to keep that obligation out of the rules."

Obama Commutes Another 98 Sentences
10 hours ago

President Obama commuted the sentences of another 98 drug offenders on Thursday. Most of the convicts were charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs or possession with intent to distribute. Many of the sentences were commuted to expire next year, but some will run longer. Others are required to enroll in residential drug treatment as a condition of their release.

DOJ Busts More Than 50 for Call Center Scam
10 hours ago

The Department of Justice announced today it's charged "61 individuals and entities for their alleged involvement in a transnational criminal organization that has victimized tens of thousands of persons in the United States through fraudulent schemes that have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. In connection with the scheme, 20 individuals were arrested today in the United States and 32 individuals and five call centers in India were charged for their alleged involvement. An additional U.S.-based defendant is currently in the custody of immigration authorities."

Clinton Up 9 in USA Today Poll; Up 3 According to Fox
14 hours ago

A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll finds Clinton leads Trump by 9 points nationwide, 47% to 38%. A Fox News national poll has Clinton up just three points, 44% to 41% over Trump.

Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
16 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.