States Holding Out on Medicaid Expansion Are Beginning to Crack

New Hampshire could be the first of many to sign on.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
March 21, 2014, 1 a.m.

As Planned Par­ent­hood sup­port­ers ral­lied out­side Flor­ida Gov. Rick Scott’s of­fice earli­er this week, state Sen. Arthenia Joyn­er lashed out at op­pon­ents of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. Stand­ing at a wooden lectern, sur­roun­ded by scores of wo­men, she crossed party lines to stump for a bill that would in­crease the num­ber of poor Flor­idi­ans covered by Medi­caid.

“We need to pass Sen. Gar­cia’s bill,” the Demo­crat told the gathered masses, re­fer­ring to a pro­pos­al in­tro­duced by her Re­pub­lic­an col­league Rene Gar­cia. “It was good enough for the speak­er’s fam­ily,” she ad­ded, re­fer­ring to a time when Re­pub­lic­an House Speak­er Will Weather­ford’s fam­ily had re­lied on med­ic­al as­sist­ance to pay for his broth­er’s can­cer treat­ments. “By golly, it’s good enough for all of the fam­il­ies of Flor­ida.” That story, first re­por­ted in The Tampa Tribune, is just the latest sign that Obama­care’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­fort has reached a tip­ping point.

With 25 states and the Dis­trict of Columbia opt­ing in to Medi­caid un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act and an­oth­er six in limbo, the tu­mult in a hand­ful of hol­d­out states is in­creas­ing. The White House hopes un­rest in states like Flor­ida, New Hamp­shire, Neb­raska, and Maine will help turn the fight de­cidedly in their fa­vor. And there’s good reas­on to think that’s hap­pen­ing.

New Hamp­shire, a state that was non­com­mit­tal on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, is now on the brink of ex­pand­ing cov­er­age to ap­prox­im­ately 50,000 poor res­id­ents. The Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled Sen­ate voted to pass a state-mod­i­fied ver­sion of ex­pan­sion earli­er this month. And, on Tues­day, a House pan­el en­dorsed the mo­tion. The Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled House is ex­pec­ted to pass the bill in a vote next week.

In Vir­gin­ia, Demo­crat­ic Gov. Terry McAul­iffe has been fight­ing for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion since he was elec­ted in Novem­ber (the Re­pub­lic­an-led House is op­posed). Ten­sions came to a head this week­end when sev­er­al hun­dred demon­strat­ors gathered out­side the state Cap­it­ol in Rich­mond to rally for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, car­ry­ing signs that read “We need Medi­caid ex­pan­sion now” and “Get sick, go broke, un­ac­cept­able!”

In Pennsylvania, Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Tom Corbett had ori­gin­ally pro­posed a mod­i­fied ver­sion of the pro­gram, ty­ing in a con­tro­ver­sial re­quire­ment that mad­ated those work­ing few­er than 20 hours per week par­ti­cip­ate in a job-train­ing pro­gram to qual­i­fy for cov­er­age. The gov­ernor has since sub­mit­ted a softer pro­pos­al that “re­stores some be­ne­fits” and drops the work-search re­quire­ment in fa­vor of a vol­un­tary pi­lot pro­gram. That plan, cur­rently un­der re­view by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, is un­likely to win sup­port from Wash­ing­ton, giv­en Corbett’s stip­u­la­tions.

Rep­res­ent­at­ives for Utah Gov. Gary Her­bert traveled to D.C. this week to dis­cuss Medi­caid ex­pan­sion ef­forts with ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials. The gov­ernor, who ini­tially re­frained from opt­ing in, in Janu­ary vowed to take ac­tion on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, say­ing while he op­poses Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care law, the state has an ob­lig­a­tion to help its poor. But his pro­pos­al, a “block grant” op­tion that would use fed­er­al dol­lars to cov­er the poor in private plans, failed to win the sup­port of Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers in the House and Sen­ate. The Salt Lake Tribune re­ports that “though he lacks the back­ing of the Le­gis­lature, law­makers haven’t tied his hands.” Her­bert ad­visers meet­ing with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion this week in­clude Wes­ley Smith, dir­ect­or of state and fed­er­al re­la­tions; Dav­id Pat­ton, head of the state’s De­part­ment of Health; and staff mem­bers from the Health De­part­ment’s Medi­caid of­fice, ac­cord­ing to the Deser­et News.

Move­ment in Mis­souri has been sty­mied by a stan­doff between Demo­crat­ic Gov. Jay Nix­on, an ad­voc­ate of ex­pan­sion, and the state’s GOP Le­gis­lature. But even there, the dy­nam­ic is start­ing to shift. KCUR.org re­por­ted Tues­day that Mis­souri politi­cians “might be inch­ing to­ward middle ground that would ex­pand Medi­caid eli­gib­il­ity while re­form­ing the safety-net pro­gram to en­cour­age re­cip­i­ents to work,” ac­cord­ing to two key par­ti­cipants in the talks. Le­gis­la­tion pending in the House is sched­uled for a hear­ing on on March 25.

These stor­ies of in­cre­ment­al pro­gress can also be found in states that have re­jec­ted Medi­caid ex­pan­sion out­right, a de­cision states may change at any time. In Neb­raska, the Le­gis­lature is bat­tling it out over ex­pan­sion with on­look­ers like Demo­crat­ic gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Chuck Hassebrook,who is ur­ging state law­makers to pass a bill that would ex­pand cov­er­age to some 54,000 un­in­sured Neb­raskans. Small protests have be­gun in South Car­o­lina, with demon­strat­ors gath­er­ing out­side the State House park­ing gar­age weekly to protest the state’s de­cision not to ac­cept fed­er­al Medi­caid money. (On Tues­day, the 16 pro­test­ers were sent to court for ob­struct­ing traffic.) And in Maine, state law­makers have backed a com­prom­ise on Medi­caid ex­pan­sion but fell just short of the veto-proof ma­jor­ity needed to get it past Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Paul LePage. (Maine’s ver­sion of the bill would ex­pand the state Medi­caid pro­gram to provide health care cov­er­age for 60,000 to 70,000 in­di­vidu­als earn­ing just over $15,856 a year.)

No doubt many of these bills will con­tin­ue to be sty­mied for some time — vir­tu­ally all of them by people with the means not to rely on such in­sur­ance. And plenty of con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics will con­tin­ue to rage that Medi­caid ex­pan­sion is “sin­ful” and that the Af­ford­able Care Act is “a plot to des­troy the fam­ily.” But it’s look­ing in­creas­ingly like time is not on their side.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
8 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×