Mary Landrieu Is Paying — and Getting Paid Big — for Her Stance on Global Warming

When it comes to Mary Landrieu and the environmental movement, it's complicated. 
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
March 23, 2014, 7:14 a.m.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists need Mary Landrieu, but they don’t love her — and they’re prov­ing it with their check­books.

Louisi­ana’s Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or and Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Bill Cas­sidy are locked in a Bay­ou battle that will go a long way in de­term­in­ing wheth­er Demo­crats can hold their im­periled Sen­ate ma­jor­ity, a force that has proved an im­plac­able bul­wark against a steady stream of House Re­pub­lic­an at­tacks on en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions.

But that hasn’t con­vinced the en­vir­on­ment­al lobby’s heavy hit­ters to cut checks for Landrieu. In the past year, only one en­vir­on­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tion has donated to her cam­paign. The Bat­on Rouge-based Cen­ter for Coastal Con­ser­va­tion gave Landrieu a $2,500 nod, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics. The Si­erra Club, Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil, and En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund have handed over a com­bined con­tri­bu­tion of ex­actly noth­ing. All three groups de­clined to com­ment on the re­cord when asked wheth­er they would en­dorse Landrieu.

So why have en­vir­on­ment­al­ists thus far washed their hands of a cam­paign so crit­ic­al to their move­ment’s fu­ture?

In short: They just can’t stand her stance on glob­al warm­ing. Landrieu is an oil- and gas-in­dustry cham­pi­on who tip­toes around the glob­al-warm­ing de­bate and voted to block the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cli­mate rules for power plants. Lin­ing up be­hind a can­did­ate like that, en­vir­on­ment­al groups fear, would sig­nal to Demo­crats that their sup­port is un­con­di­tion­al — and that greens can be taken for gran­ted.

“We don’t want to be in a situ­ation where one party feels like we’re be­hold­en to them. That’s how we get taken ad­vant­age of,” said Ben Schreiber, a spokes­man for Friends of the Earth Ac­tion, the polit­ic­al fun­drais­ing arm of Friends of the Earth. “Can­did­ates need to know that there are con­sequences to the way they vote.”

Landrieu was nev­er go­ing to be a darling of the en­vir­on­ment­al move­ment. She rep­res­ents a state dot­ted with oil wells and re­finer­ies, and sides with the fossil fuel in­dustry more of­ten than not. She also backs the Key­stone XL pipeline at a time when op­pos­i­tion to the oil sands pro­ject has be­come the green move­ment’s call to arms.

The Louisi­ana Demo­crat also holds con­sid­er­able sway over en­ergy policy. She’s the chair of the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee, and if an­oth­er bi­par­tis­an en­ergy bill comes out of Con­gress un­der Landrieu’s watch, it would be covered in her fin­ger­prints.

“Landrieu puts the en­vir­on­ment­al com­munity in a dif­fi­cult situ­ation,” Schreiber said. “She’s been aw­ful on cli­mate change and she’s quite re­spons­ive to the oil and gas in­dustry. And she’s chair of the En­ergy Com­mit­tee. That makes things com­plic­ated.”

En­vir­on­ment­al groups have been will­ing to for­give oth­er mod­er­ates for their fossil-fuel em­brace as part of a broad­er cam­paign to keep their pre­ferred party in power.

NRDC Ac­tion Fund, the polit­ic­al fun­drais­ing arm of the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil, is already sup­port­ing Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina and Mark Be­gich of Alaska, two vul­ner­able Sen­ate Demo­crats who, like Landrieu, say the pipeline should be built.

“It’s not real­ist­ic to ask people to be with you 100 per­cent of the time. A pur­ity test doesn’t work in polit­ics,” Heath­er Taylor-Miesle, the fund’s dir­ect­or, said. “We look for people we can work with on a num­ber of is­sues. They don’t have to have a per­fect re­cord.”

So why has Landrieu been left out in the cold?

The real deal-break­er is the sen­at­or’s stance on cli­mate. Landrieu’s not a cli­mate change den­ier, but she sidesteps the is­sue every chance she gets. Be­gich and Hagan, on the oth­er hand, have been out­spoken in their calls to ac­tion on glob­al warm­ing. Landrieu also op­poses En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency reg­u­la­tions to curb power-plant emis­sions, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s primary av­en­ue to counter cli­mate change and a key part of the pres­id­ent’s second-term cli­mate agenda. In the pre­vi­ous ses­sion of Con­gress, Landrieu voted in sup­port of a meas­ure to pre­vent the agency from reg­u­lat­ing green­house gases. Be­gich and Hagan did not.

The elec­tion year is young, and the en­vir­on­ment­al lobby is not a mono­lith, so it’s pos­sible that more mod­er­ate groups will shell out for the sen­at­or. The En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund partnered with Landrieu on Gulf Coast res­tor­a­tion — as did the Na­tion­al Wild­life Fed­er­a­tion.

But where greens have with­held their fund­ing, the fossil fuel in­dustry has more than filled the void. 

The oil and gas in­dustry is the second-largest con­trib­ut­or to Landrieu’s cam­paign com­mit­tee and lead­er­ship PAC com­bined. The in­dustry has also done more to give the sen­at­or a boost than her Re­pub­lic­an chal­lenger. Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics, Landrieu’s cam­paign has so far raised close to $9.5 mil­lion with a cool $564,350 com­ing from the oil and gas in­dustry. Cas­sidy, in com­par­is­on, has raised just over $5.1 mil­lion and got­ten $180,750 from the in­dustry.

It’s un­clear wheth­er Landrieu would even want en­vir­on­ment­al­ists’ back­ing.

When Nex­t­Gen Cli­mate Ac­tion, an en­vir­on­ment­al group backed by bil­lion­aire Tom Stey­er, raised the pos­sib­il­ity last month of tar­get­ing the sen­at­or through an anti-Key­stone XL ad cam­paign, Landrieu said Stey­er’s ad buy would likely boost her pop­ular­ity in Louisi­ana.

The Si­erra Club’s stamp of ap­prov­al isn’t ex­actly a badge of hon­or in an oil state. “That’s something an op­pon­ent could seize and run with,” said Frank O’Don­nell, pres­id­ent of Clean Air Watch, an en­vir­on­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tion that does not take part in elect­or­al polit­ics. “Nobody wants to waste money do­ing something that could back­fire.”

What We're Following See More »
SANS PROOF
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
2 days ago
UPDATE
NEW TRAVEL BAN COMING SOON
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
2 days ago
UPDATE
“WE’RE CHANGING IT”
Trump Rails On Obamacare
2 days ago
UPDATE

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

FAKE NEWS
Trump Goes After The Media
2 days ago
UPDATE

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login